search for: assuage

Dear All, discussing with a statistician of a pharmaceutical company I received this answer about the statistical package that I have planned to use: As R is not a validated software package, we would like to ask if it would rather be possible for you to use SAS, SPSS or another approved statistical software system. Could someone suggest me a 'polite' answer? TIA Giovanni -- dr.

Good morning/day/night to all! After moving all my infrastructure to Debian9, changed my ADDC from Win2K12 to Samba4 scanning my network I found the following: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- koratsuki at happyharry:~$ nmap --script smb-vuln-ms08-067.nse -p445 smb-addc.tld Starting Nmap 7.50 (

...g this all work and then throw it all away. * Release 0.23.3 with a couple of other important fixes plus a forward compatibility fix that solves this particular problem. This is kinda hackish, since why upgrade to 0.23.3 if you can just go all the way to 0.24.0? That being said, it might assuage some people''s concerns. What do people think should be done? -- Beware of all enterprises that require new clothes. -- Henry David Thoreau --------------------------------------------------------------------- Luke Kanies | http://reductivelabs.com | http://madstop.com

I hope that Marc doesn't mind, but I felt that part of his recent post was important enough to deserve it's own subject line rather then being lost in a 60-msg-long thread... On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:08 AM, Marc Schwartz <marc_schwartz at comcast.net> wrote: ... I strongly believe that the comments regarding R and the FDA are overly negative and pessimistic. The hurdles to

...sswd to allow the ordinary user to change their Samba password. Any suggestions? Michael Ruxton Hydrographic Systems Analyst (902) 426-4227 fax: (902) 426-1893 Canadian Hydrographic Service (Atlantic) 1 Challenger Drive PO Box 1006 Bedford Institute of Oceanography Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2 Once we assuage our conscience by calling something a "necessary evil," it begins to look more and more necessary and less and less evil. - Sydney J. Harris

...DCESRV_FAULT(DCERPC_FAULT_OP_RNG_ERROR); } As you can see from https://svn.nmap.org/nmap/scripts/smb-vuln-ms08-067.nse Any fault code is assumed to mean a vulnerable server, the RNG_ERROR (yet another way to say not implemented) included. Hopefully this is enough to assist you, if you need to assuage an auditor then I suggest submitting a patch implementing it. This won't be hard, the clue is in the implementation note: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc247297.aspx#Appendix_A_116 <116> Section 3.1.4.31: The server does a standard C string comparison on the canonicalized pat...

...es 0.2.2 did not reencode VBR mp3s. Are there any plans to include such support in future ices versions? If so, any ideas as to when such versions would become available? Thanks, -- "Shall life renew these bodies of a truth? Steve Chadsey All death will be annul, all tears assuage? <tyr@teiresias.net> Fill the void veins of life, again with youth. And wash with an immortal water, age." -- Anathema, "They Die" --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from th...

Hi, In http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2002-09/msg01155.html, I noted that the often-observed hangs of rsync under Cygwin were assuaged by a call to msleep(). After upgrading my Cygwin environment to rsync 2.5.6, I'm seeing these hangs again, not surprisingly given a CVS entry for main.c notes that this kludge was not harmless: Revision 1.162 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs] , Tue Jan 28 05:05:53 2003 UTC (4...

I just got a Diffusion notification about a change of mine being reverted by Fangrui, but I'm not sure that's actually what happened and am confused and concerned. My commit was "[DebugInfo] Allow spill slots in call site parameter descriptions", and it appears in the history under two hashes: 1ee84e and 67c416. The first commit contains the actual change. The second touches

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 8:47 PM, Rafael Espíndola < rafael.espindola at gmail.com> wrote: > > However, everyone seems to think I'm advocating we never move the CMake > > version forward. That isn't what I'm saying at all. What I am saying is > that > > moving the CMake version forward has a cost. Not a huge insurmountable > cost, > > but non-zero

Well, I see that my last email hasn''t generated any reaction from the Rails core team. It looks like all of them are the happy users of "plain text" (which, as we know by now, doesn''t exist, but still). I apologize in advance for the sore bitterness of this message but I see that the Rails-core STILL, despite all of the efforts, sees these issues as something

I've taken the liberty of starting a new thread to discuss the design of the Asterisk CDR mechanism. The discussion has been kindly initiated by murf putting together a proposal: http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/murf/RFCs. After reading the proposal I still don't think it's the right way to go. To my mind adding more channel variables increases the complexity in a situation

Fedora Core 7 has just updated their Ruby package (was 1.8.6.36-3.fc7, is now 1.8.6.110-3.fc7), and the upgrade broke my Puppet installation, and there was a similar report from someone else. Communications between the puppetmasterd and the puppetd running on the same host broke down with the message: Could not retrieve configuration: Certificates were not trusted: hostname not match with

Hi All I am really very interested in starting to use R within our company. I particularly like the open source nature of the product. My company is a medical research company which is part of the University of London. We conduct contract virology research for large pharma companies. My question is how do we validate this software? I wonder if anyone else has had the problem and might be able to

Suppose we have a method ''foo'' which internally uses another method ''bar''. Being good BDDers we mock out the ''bar'' method. After all, we only want to spec the ''foo'' method - actually running the ''bar'' method means slower, less maintainable and brittler specs. That''s why we <3 mocking,