search for: assosiations

hello all, I need any framework that generate models using the database structure.... Anyone knows if have this framework???? Thank''s -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

--On Monday, October 05, 2015 10:46 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > So, is there any convenient way to construct an IPTables rule to block > all IPs associated with a given Domain Name server? IPs have the reversed lookup "assosiated" with a NS. What do you mean with "associated"? Do mean all IPs that this DNS server

Hi, I am using the NLSY79 data (longitudinal data from the Bureau of labour stats in the US). The extractor exctracts this data in a "wide" format and I need to reshape it into a long format. What I am doing right now is to do it in chuncks for each and evry variable that is varying and then I merge the data together. This is taking a long time. my question is: How do I specify that

Hi, I am very new to Asterisk. I wanted to know how to retrive the Voicemails. I could see some voicemails assosiated with some extensions. Any ideas?? --------------------------------- How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos. Get Yahoo! Photos -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Good Day! My name is Anna Sakharova. I live in Russia, Yaroslavl sity. I'm 20 years old. I study Computer Security at Yaroslavl state University named after Demidov(Matematic Department, 4 course). I'm interested in mathematic and coding. I would like to write programs assosiated with my profession. My favorite language is c++ builder. My experience: 1). Program that provide deterministic

On 10/6/2015 6:34 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > --On Monday, October 05, 2015 10:46 AM -0400 "James B. Byrne"<byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> wrote: > >> >So, is there any convenient way to construct an IPTables rule to block >> >all IPs associated with a given Domain Name server? > IPs have the reversed lookup "assosiated" with a NS. > > What do

Hit reply instead of reply all. This is for the list. -------------------------- Original Message -------------------------- Subject: Re: [CentOS] Can one construct an IPTables rule to block on NS records? From: "James B. Byrne" <byrnejb at harte-lyne.ca> Date: Wed, October 7, 2015 08:52 To: "John R Pierce" <pierce at hogranch.com>

Hi *, I''m looking at typo authentication, and was asking myself if it''s correct to put in a session variable a user object which has_many posts ... Just because I''m rolling my own authentication system and want to know what''s the best way to handle this issue (other than using a generator or a plugin, which I''d prefer not to use). -- Nicholas

I am using rsync to try and keep the development environment on 4 machines consistant. I am using Rsync version 2.6.4 under Debian Sarge I am trying to sync between real servers and vmware ones so the time stamps could be an issue but I have set the vmware machines to update time via ntp on a regular basis and made the --modify-window=2010 so I thought I should be fine. The problems I have

I have two models, Stop and Station, they relate one station to many stops. Stop has_one :station Station belongs_to :stop So I can do @station.stops, but I cant do @stop.station, is this right? For example in the view I have: <% for @stop in @stops %> <tr> <td><%= @stop.station.name %></td> <td><%= @stop.time.hour.to_s + '':''

Well, I put it here. All the experience gained in about-half-an-year-management of Samba-PDC + numerous NT4 workstations is included. Also, I'd be glad to hear from you what did I miss! 1) when NT4-workstations are organised into "domain", there's some action assosiated to this: "to log into domain". samba ain such case acts as PDC (primary domain controller),

This is the same origin that I reported on earlier. Apparently asking for an explanation of why they were probing our sites only encouraged them to make additional attempts. sshd: Authentication Failures: unknown (ip-173-201-178-18.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-196-33.ip.secureserver.net): 2 Time(s) unknown (ip-97-74-202-95.ip.secureserver.net): 2

The handling of permissions in rsync (2.5.2) is nasty or broken. (tested platforms: Linux 2.4.x and Solaris 7) We have a directory which should only accessible to a group of users (test) : [sn@noname test]$ ls -lda /home/test drwxrws--- 2 root test 4096 Feb 13 15:44 /home/test Every user has an umask of 007 and his/her own default group: [sn@noname sn]$ id uid=500(sn)

Can someone tell if there is a reason models shouldn''t access the session? Models could easily be made to access the session or some other shared persistant data store such as a file or a table. _This is the problem_, a model needs to know certain information eg. the id of the current user. But the model has no idea about anything outside of its self, because it can''t access

TEST 3 If you get a "connection refused" response then the smbd server may not be running. If you installed it in inetd.conf then you probably edited that file incorrectly. If you installed it as a daemon then check that it is running, and check that the netbios-ssn port is in a LISTEN state using "netstat -a". Note: You have xinetd not inetd on the redhat box. To avoid all

Is there another way of doing the bindings so that the Windows share doesn't run on TCP/IP but will still work with SAMBA? If so, where in the docs should I be looking, and if not - maybe this should be something discussed by the SAMBA dev people.. Regards, Marc. Return-Path: <twunder@iwmail.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from femail14.sdc1.sfba.home.com