search for: assetkey

Hello zfs-discuss, http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6604198-1 Is there a patch for S10? I thought it''s been fixed. -- Best regards, Robert mailto:rmilkowski at task.gda.pl http://milek.blogspot.com

...r Sep 16 12:05:04 svrt12 fctl: [ID 517869 kern.warning] WARNING: fp(0)::PLOGI to 11dd6 failed. state=c reason=1. Sep 16 12:05:04 svrt12 fp: [ID 517869 kern.info] NOTICE: fp(1): PLOGI to 11dd6 failed state=Timeout, reason=Hardware Error Could be related to http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-57773-1 ?? Gino This message posted from opensolaris.org

I want to configure my zfs like this : concatination_stripe_pool : concatination lun0_controller0 lun1_controller0 concatination lun2_controller1 lun3_controller1 1. There is any option to implement it in ZFS? 2. there is other why to get the same configuration? thanks This message posted from opensolaris.org

...bm.com/aix/efixes/security/ssh_advisory.asc http://support.avaya.com/elmodocs2/security/ASA-2008-205.htm http://www.globus.org/mail_archive/security-announce/2008/04/msg00000.html http://support.attachmate.com/techdocs/2374.html#Security_Updates_in_7.0_SP1 http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-237444-1 CVE : CVE-2008-1483 BID : 28444 Medium OpenSSH CBC Mode Information Disclosure Vulnerability Risk: Medium Application: ssh Port: 22 Protocol: tcp ScriptID: 100153 Overview: The host is installed with OpenSSH and is prone to information disclosure vulnerability. Vulnerability Insight:...

On Wed, Jan 17, 2007 at 10:18:42AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote: > Hi all, > > I just read > > http://www.sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102760-1 > > Will the freebsd fundation release new jdk binaries ? There are new binaries planned. They are built even. Just being held up by lack of testing time. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : h...

I have a Solaris 10 U5 system massively patched so that it supports ZFS pool version 15 (similar to U8, kernel Generic_141445-09), live upgrade components have been updated to Solaris 10 U8 versions from the DVD, and GRUB has been updated to support redundant menus across the UFS boot environments. I have studied the Solaris 10 Live Upgrade manual (821-0438) and am unable to find any

Since the j4500 doesn''t have a internal SAS controller, would it be safe to say that ZFS cache flushes would be handled by the host''s SAS hba? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org

After having massive problems with a supermicro X7DBE box using AOC-SAT2-MV8 Marvell controllers and opensolaris snv79 (same as described here: http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-66-233341-1) we just start over using new hardware and opensolaris 2008.05 upgraded to snv94. We used again a supermicro X7DBE but now with two LSI SAS3081E SAS controllers. And guess what? Now we get these error-messages in /var/adm/messages: Aug 11 18:20:52 thumper2 scsi: [ID 107833 kern.warni...

Folks; During a jumpstart (2nd boot) of a Sun Fire 240 with Solaris 10 Update 3 (11/06), I noticed the following message; Jun 27 11:43:33 first fbt: NOTICE: cannot instrument return of fd_intr at 7b7d6278: non-canonical return instruction Kernel level was Generic_118833-33. Jumpstart was conducted using the standard JET modules. What gives? The jumpstart worked though. Solaris 10 installed

Hi, in preparation to try zfs boot on sparc I installed all recent patches incl. feature patches comming from s10s_u3wos_10 and after reboot finally 137137-09 (still having everything on UFS). Now it doesn''t boot at anymore: ############################### Sun Fire V240, No Keyboard Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved. OpenBoot 4.22.23, 2048 MB memory installed,

Hi Folks, I''m in the very unsettling position of fearing that I''ve lost all of my data via a zfs send/receive operation, despite ZFS''s legendary integrity. The error that I''m getting on restore is: receiving full stream of faith/home at 09-08-08 into Z/faith/home at 09-08-08 cannot receive: invalid stream (checksum mismatch) Background: I was running snv_91,