search for: assertive

llvm[4]: Compiling PoolAllocate.cpp for Release+Asserts build /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp: In member function ‘virtual bool llvm::PoolAllocate::runOnModule(llvm::Module&)’: /home/NIKHILREDDY/WORK/LLVM_SRC/projects/poolalloc/lib/PoolAllocate/PoolAllocate.cpp:403:16: error: ‘class llvm::Constant’ has no member named

I'm trying to write a script for checking whether the compiler recursed properly. rkotler at mipsswbrd002:~/slave/recurse3be/build$ find . -name "*.o" -exec cmp '{}' ../../recurse2be/build/'{}' \; |& tee foo.txt Is anyone else doing this? There 2 compilers, recurse 2 and recurse3 that in principle should be identical. Obviously if there is date and time

Hi, I'm trying to build llvm on a Solaris/Sparc machine. I get many undefined symbols during the link phase of opt. The link command being run is below. It is identical to the link command that gets run and works on an x86 host. Thanks, Tarun g++ -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/include -I/n/fs/scratch/tpondich/ParallelAssert/llvm-objects/tools/opt

Bugs item #11183, was opened at 2007-05-28 10:28 You can respond by visiting: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=218&aid=11183&group_id=35 Category: Incorrect behavior Group: current Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Submitted By: Patrick McDonnell (kc9ddi) Assigned to: Kevin Smith (qualitycode) Summary: GLib errors cause crash Initial Comment: Hi - I''m

It will be used for the OCaml unit tests. --- configure.ac | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index e0fb481..e360bbb 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -1120,6 +1120,7 @@ AS_IF([test "x$OCAMLC" != "xno"],[ ]) OCAML_PKG_gettext=no +OCAML_PKG_oUnit=no AS_IF([test "x$OCAMLC" != "xno"],[ #

Current llvm release 2.8 branch at r115409 is broken on x86_64-apple-darwin10. #!/bin/bash -ev export LD=`xcode-select -print-path`/usr/bin/ld xcode-select -print-path ulimit -s `ulimit -s` ulimit -s mv ../clang-2.8 ./tools/clang mkdir ../llvm_objdir cd ../llvm_objdir ../llvm-2.8/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw --mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/share/info --with-gmp=/sw

Hi Jack, I didn't get this error. Could you try again? Is it one of the release candidates in particular that's failing? -bw On Oct 2, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Current llvm release 2.8 branch at r115409 is broken on x86_64-apple-darwin10. > > #!/bin/bash -ev > export LD=`xcode-select -print-path`/usr/bin/ld > xcode-select -print-path > ulimit -s

Hi all, During discussions about assertions in the Flang project, we noticed that there are a lot of cases in LLVM that #ifndef NDEBUG is used as a guard for non-assert code that we want enabled in debug builds. This works fine on its own, however it affects the behaviour of LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS; since NDEBUG controls whether assertions are enabled or not, a lot of debug code gets enabled in

Covert common_utils_tests to use oUnit as testing framework, replacing the hand-made assert in favour of structured unit tests and better error reporting. common_utils_tests is now built only when the oUnit module has been found. --- mllib/Makefile.am | 17 ++++- mllib/common_utils_tests.ml | 155 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 64

Hi, The dovecot 2.3.0.1 Debian package currently fails to build on all big-endian architectures[1], due to murmurhash3 tests failing. The relevant output from e.g. s390x is: test-murmurhash3.c:22: Assert(#8) failed: memcmp(result, vectors[i].result, sizeof(result)) == 0 test-murmurhash3.c:22: Assert(#11) failed: memcmp(result, vectors[i].result, sizeof(result)) == 0 test-murmurhash3.c:22:

Hi all, After updating llvm+clang to r174701 by issuing make -j8 happiness The build fails with: ... make[2]: Entering directory `/local/csaba/LLVM/build-release/tools/llvm-diff' llvm[2]: Compiling DiffConsumer.cpp for Release+Asserts build llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable lli (without symbols) llvm[2]: Compiling CrashDebugger.cpp for Release+Asserts build

On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 04:13:16PM +0000, Wang, Wei W wrote: > On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > unsigned long bit; > > xb_preload(GFP_KERNEL); > > xb_set_bit(xb, 700); > > xb_preload_end(); > > bit = xb_find_set(xb, ULONG_MAX, 0); > > assert(bit == 700); > > This above test will result in "!node with bitmap

On 6/27/19 5:07 AM, Martin Kletzander wrote: > This just defines the namespace, its contexts and related constants and the only > supported one is currently base:allocation. The names of the constants are not > very future-proof, but shorter than LIBNBD_META_NS_CONTEXT_BASE_ALLOCATION or > similar. > > Currently the output looks like this: > > /* "base"

On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 9:59 AM Chris Tetreault via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > David, > > > > In my opinion, NDEBUG is one of those gross old C things that everybody > complains about. It’s called “Not Debug”, but really it means “Assert > Disabled”. I think one could be forgiven for actually using it as a > heuristic of whether or not a build

Currently LLVM releases, as downloaded from llvm.org, have assertions enabled. (I'm told Apple ships LLVM with assertions disabled, which is why I mention llvm.org here). What do people think of disabling assertions? The advantage of disabling assertions is that LLVM runs faster. I don't know how much faster. It also makes for fairer comparisons with gcc releases, which have all but

Indeed, removing that flag works fine, the only question is why this is added in tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile in the first place then and what to do about it: ifeq ($(HOST_OS), $(filter $(HOST_OS), Linux GNU GNU/kFreeBSD)) # Don't allow unresolved symbols. LLVMLibsOptions += -Wl,--no-undefined endif On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Alexander Potapenko <glider at

Actually it only link the shlib fine. Linking any executable against it fails: llvm[2]: Linking Release+Asserts executable llvm-lto (without symbols) /home/kfischer/julia/deps/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts/Release+Asserts/bin/clang++ -fsanitize=address -O3 -Wl,-R -Wl,'$ORIGIN/../lib' -L/home/kfischer/julia/deps/llvm-svn/build_Release+Asserts+Sanitize/Release+Asserts/lib

On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path. > > > > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be > > good to get the fundamental part in first, and

On Wednesday, December 20, 2017 8:26 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:34:36PM +0800, Wei Wang wrote: > > On 12/19/2017 10:05 PM, Tetsuo Handa wrote: > > > I think xb_find_set() has a bug in !node path. > > > > I think we can probably remove the "!node" path for now. It would be > > good to get the fundamental part in first, and

Hi, On Linux I observed [root at localhost poolalloc]# find . -name *.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/LLVMDataStructure.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/poolalloc.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/AssistDS.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_fl_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpoolalloc_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libpa_pre_rt.a ./Release+Asserts/lib/libcount.a On cygwin I observed kpawar at KPAWAR-LT