search for: assembler_direct

Hi Sid, It seems Apple's assembler used to treat .align 0 differently: https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/developertools/Reference/Assembler/040-Assembler_Directives/asm_directives.html If this is still the case, than we should have an option for what to do in this case, maybe defaulting based on the triple? cheers, --renato On 28 October 2013 17:53, Sid Manning <sidneym at codeaurora.org> wrote: > > I have several assembly files in a tests...

...thing here. -Jim On Oct 28, 2013, at 11:54 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > Hi Sid, > > It seems Apple's assembler used to treat .align 0 differently: > > https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/developertools/Reference/Assembler/040-Assembler_Directives/asm_directives.html > > If this is still the case, than we should have an option for what to do in this case, maybe defaulting based on the triple? > > cheers, > --renato > > > On 28 October 2013 17:53, Sid Manning <sidneym at codeaurora.org> wrote: > >...

I have several assembly files in a testsuite that use, ".align 0". I found a reference to, ".align 0" in ARM's elf.h that says .align 0 is redundant and gas treats this as align 2. Should the llvm-mc follow this convention? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation

...ato.golin at linaro.org > <mailto:renato.golin at linaro.org>> wrote: > >> Hi Sid, >> >> It seems Apple's assembler used to treat .align 0 differently: >> >> https://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/developertools/Reference/Assembler/040-Assembler_Directives/asm_directives.html >> >> If this is still the case, than we should have an option for what to >> do in this case, maybe defaulting based on the triple? >> >> cheers, >> --renato >> >> >> On 28 October 2013 17:53, Sid Manning <sidneym at...