Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "aspl".
Did you mean:
arpl
2007 May 10
0
FW: Load balancing using connmark
...only in where packets are marked and which packets are
marked. Routing is the same.
For a detailed discussion on the first approach, you can refer to this
thread.
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q2/018964.html
-----Original Message-----
From: Francis Brosnan Blazquez [mailto:francis@aspl.es]
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2007 5:07 PM
To: Salim S I
Cc: lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl
Subject: RE: [LARTC] Load balancing using connmark
El jue, 10-05-2007 a las 16:01 +0800, Salim S I escribió:
Hi Salim,
Thanks for your reply,
> On closer look, I am wrong about shorewall. It seems to be a differ...
2007 Feb 08
0
Configuring several route tables for the same network interface
...d by the linux box using the same
router, avoiding to always use the "Provider Router 1" which is the
default via installed in the "main" route table?
Thanks for your attention!
[1] http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
--
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.
2007 May 09
10
Load balancing using connmark
...dy find that some packages doesn''t get properly routed
according to the mark with the first solution? What you do think about
the second solution?
Cheers!
[1] http://mailman.ds9a.nl/pipermail/lartc/2006q2/018964.html
[2] http://www.shorewall.net
--
Francis Brosnan Blazquez <francis@aspl.es>
Advanced Software Production Line, S.L.