Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "asmsyntax".
2012 Aug 06
0
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] MS-style inline assembly
...ted are worth it.
> 4. How do we distinguish the assembly dialect at the IR level?
>
I also agree about adding a new attribute to the IR. I'm not familiar with
how IR metadata works, but instead of having specific syntax attributes (
iasyntaxatt), it would be cleaner to have a generic asmsyntax attribute
that could take att/intel values.
5. How should the inline asm be represented in the AST?
>
> This is largely an open question and I'm still in the process of
> familiarize
> myself with the frontend. Doing this in a sane way is going to be
> critical for
> provid...
2012 Aug 06
3
[LLVMdev] [RFC] MS-style inline assembly
All,
The purpose of this email is to open a discussion on the design and
implementation of support for Microsoft-style inline assembly in clang. The
majority of the work will be done in clang, but I'm CC'ing both dev lists to get
the most exposure possible. There are _many_ open questions and the
forthcoming description is likely to be obscure in many place (at times this
is on purpose,
2012 Aug 06
2
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] [RFC] MS-style inline assembly
...e.
>
>
> 4. How do we distinguish the assembly dialect at the IR level?
>
> I also agree about adding a new attribute to the IR. I'm not familiar with how IR metadata works, but instead of having specific syntax attributes (iasyntaxatt), it would be cleaner to have a generic asmsyntax attribute that could take att/intel values.
I don't think metadata would be the right approach as it would be rather heavy handed considering were only storing a bit or two of information. An attribute is the right way to go, so this is really a discussion about syntax. I think I prefer your...