search for: askar

hi list, I'm just curious if someone succesfully done dovecot authentication of Active directory and I will appreciage any link in this regards Thanks Askar

Ok, thanks. I removed --inplace and --append-verify and kept --link-dest and --partial. And now the script works exactly as I want: hard-links are not updated, the script is still robust and can copy large files over unstable links etc, etc. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...;, and then renames this to (for example) 2014-12-01-000000. So, if rsync interrupts, then at the next run the script will end "in-progress" (all partial files will be done) and then will rename this dir to 2014-12-01-000000. So, there never will be partial files in finished snapshots. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...e. So, rsync will never write new file directly into old one (without unlinking). If there already is old file and it needs updating, then rsync will write into something like .file-He4gw, and then it will rename this file to its right name. This new file will not have any hardlinks to old files == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

This is OK for me. I care about file contents, not metadata. == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...incomplete or corrupt copies on the target. Okey, so, I should remove --inplace and --append-verify? But then copying large file over unstable inet will not work, right? Is there any way to keep --link-dest working right and simultaneously have possibility to copy large file over unstable inet? == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...ad of --link-dest >so that the target dir starts out completely populated. You mean making "cp -al" on the remote and then start rsync to newly created dir with --partial and without --link-dest, --inplace, --append-verify? What is benefits? Even metadata will not leak to old files? == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

"dovecot-auth: ldap(branch): No password in reply" Is this Freebsd error , or active directory is not configured correctly or dovecot bug? regards Askar

hi thanks for your reply heh "Example: ip del rule pref 32742" is syntically wrong :) and when i tried "ip rule del 32742" it gives me error # ip rule del 32742 Error: argument "32742" is wrong: Failed to parse rule type so how to get get of these extra rules? 0: from all lookup local 32742: from all fwmark 0x2 lookup squid.out 32743: from all fwmark 0x2

...r needed. Okey, I will stick with --link-dest, thanks a lot. >So, maybe I >have extra copies of some php, html, and jpg files but I know how they >were at the time they were backed up. You can still do "cp -al" and backup "ls -lR" or "find -ls" output. :) == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...And this was wrong. So, what to do? I. e. how to fix the script? Or maybe this is a bug in rsync? I. e. "--link-dest --inplace doesn't unlink"? Some quick fix will be good. Maybe I should remove --inplace and leave --partial? But will the script still be such robust in this case? == Askar Safin http://vk.com/safinaskar Kazan, Russia

...a, This error is fine. The buildbot has tested the worker version. 0.8.x apparently does not have that method. The error gets handled gracefully on the server side. At least it seems so so far. That should not prevent your bot from connecting. Thanks Galina On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 2:11 PM Paula Askar <paulatoth at google.com> wrote: > Hey Andrzej, > > What are you seeing in your buildbot logs? Is it this error? > `twisted.spread.flavors.NoSuchMethod: No such method: > remote_getWorkerInfo` > > If so, you might want to try updating your buildbot worker. > I updated...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Are you specifying --partial-dir? Seems like that would be needed or else you will end up would end up with an incomplete copy in the previous target? On 12/26/2014 06:50 PM, Askar Safin wrote: > Ok, thanks. I removed --inplace and --append-verify and kept > --link-dest and --partial. And now the script works exactly as I > want: hard-links are not updated, the script is still robust and > can copy large files over unstable links etc, etc. == Askar Safin > htt...

...etc. If a link exists in the target and needs a metadata change then rsync will do a chmod, chown, whatever which updates all the instances of the file. If there hadn't already been a link there rsync would have written out an entire new file to have the new metadata. On 12/26/2014 08:32 PM, Askar Safin wrote: > No. Now there is no --inplace. So, rsync will never write new file > directly into old one (without unlinking). If there already is old > file and it needs updating, then rsync will write into something > like .file-He4gw, and then it will rename this file to its right &g...

...size but zoom on and READ it... ... because I'm not able to input anything to it, please correct me if I'm wrong; maybe it is already possible, but I still don't know how to do that... I'm used gentoo overlay portage, xgl-coffe, to install compiz-20060416. Thanks in advance! -- Askar Bektassov (????? ????????)

...instances of that file rather than making a new one with the new metadata. I want my metadata to be correct on each backup so if one of my - --link-dest backups fails for some reason I delete the entire target and start over using the same link-dest and a new empty target. On 12/26/2014 08:24 AM, Askar Safin wrote: >> - --inplace and --append-verify are essentially irrelevant when - >> --link-dest is in play. With --link-dest in play the target >> system must write an entirely new file even for a change in >> permissions or timestamps so any potential benefit by these &gt...

...#39;t but I didn't change anything what did you guys do?!?!?" I need to be able to look in the backups and see if any permissions have changed. So, maybe I have extra copies of some php, html, and jpg files but I know how they were at the time they were backed up. On 12/26/2014 09:24 PM, Askar Safin wrote: >> BTW, if you want it to always have that behavior (it can save a >> lot of backup space) you can use the old cp -al method instead of >> --link-dest so that the target dir starts out completely >> populated. > You mean making "cp -al" on the remot...

...ay the target system must write an entirely new file even for a change in permissions or timestamps so any potential benefit by these options are out the window from the start. The only thing they can do is add the possibility of incomplete or corrupt copies on the target. On 12/25/2014 09:49 PM, Askar Safin wrote: > Hi. This is bug report and simultaneously urgent asking for help. I > am trying to write my rsync wrapper script, which will create > minutely snapshots of my data using --link-dest. I want this script > to be robust, it should work even if I do suspend/hibernate/reboot &...

...rules our 1mb link got chocked and we have to "route delete default gw xxx.xxx.xx (1mb). Now what I want may be "shapping" to route 70% traffic via 2Mb and 30 via 1Mb. Is this possible via iproute2? if yes I will greatly appreciate if someone helps newbie to iproute2 :) regards Askar _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

Our Flang-aarch64 buildbots just won't connect to the main Buildbot master anymore. I switched them to the staging buildbot master instead and it seems fine for now. Is there anything that we can/should tweak at our end? http://lab.llvm.org:8014/#/waterfall?tags=flang -Andrzej On 08/10/2020 00:31, Galina Kistanova via cfe-dev wrote: > They are online now -