search for: asiri

I was hoping to avoid the trouble of having to setup a master buildbot. But may be it's just easier to run Zorg as-is locally alongside the buildslave. I'll give that a go. Cheers, / Asiri On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 8:45 PM, Yaron Keren <yaron.keren at gmail.com> wrote: > You don't really need to use the llvm builders infrastructure, just setup > a local jenkins (or whatever) bot that triggers from the llvm svn, see > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/100...

Hi Asiri, You can use your local master for this or use silent master. Silent buildbot is currently copy of llvm buildbot, but does not sent any notifications. The both have the same set of builders and it's easy to switch a slave between them. To add slave/builder please add your slave and builder t...

On 11 July 2016 at 17:06, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > Ignore me please, noted that you said it's the identical configuration with > just the library re-ordering. > > Shall I revert the link ordering until we have time to investigate? I can't see anything wrong in reverting...

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Carsten Mattner <carstenmattner at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake > <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that...

I changed the library order in response to a review comment [1], but can't see how that's causing this failure. @Renato: can you check on that box if reverting the library order actually fixes the problem? Just to double check if that's indeed the cause. Thanks. / Asiri [1] http://reviews.llvm.org/D14293#inline-118681 On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Craig, Ben via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 7/11/2016 9:39 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > >> My suspicion is that the test is failing in the test block starting at >>> li...

Hi, I'm trying to generate some SPARCv8 assembly for a sparc target that doesn't have an FPU. I'm unable to get the flow to generate calls to a soft-float library. Since I wasn't able to find a definitive answer, I was hoping someone might be able to offer some pointers or shed some light. Running "clang -c -emit-llvm -msoft-float test.c -o test.bc" doesn't generate

On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that >> it doesn't try to use...

You don't really need to use the llvm builders infrastructure, just setup a local jenkins (or whatever) bot that triggers from the llvm svn, see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10014252/jenkins-ci-how-to-trigger-builds-on-svn-commit 2016-05-27 22:26 GMT+03:00 Asiri Rathnayake via cfe-dev < cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > Hi Galina, > > I would like to setup a silent buildslave for some experiments. > Essentially, I would like to receive build requests from the llvm master > buildbot, do my local builds but not publish results on the main b...

...n exception and you have disabled exceptions. You got me there! I think it's OK to be consistent across all the places and call abort(), this is what I've been doing in my current patch. I will double check this behavior with other compilers that provide similar functionality. Thanks. - Asiri

...pened I don't think all of those cases are exposed in the current tests, we need to weed-out these cases and add more tests. Does that sound like an OK plan? What do others think about supporting the no-exceptions libcxx variety long-term? Please let me know. Many thanks. - Asiri -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151029/43bbfc97/attachment.html>

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 1:37 PM, Asiri Rathnayake < asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 8:36 PM, Vedant Kumar via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> > On Apr 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Scott Smith <scott.smith at purestorage.com> >> w...

...https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/master/lib/Demangle/ItaniumDemangle.cpp [3] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/libcxx/blob/master/ include/__threading_support PS: Here's a particularly amusing bug of the current libcxxabi demangler: https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=31031 Cheers, / Asiri > > vedant > > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com> wrote: > > I thought the plan of record was (r280732): > > > > ''' > > Once the fast demangler in lldb can handle any names this > > implementatio...

...to receive build requests from the llvm master buildbot, do my local builds but not publish results on the main buildbot (or complain to users when the builds fail). Would such a setup be possible? I looked at the documentation [1] but that seems to describe a normal buildslave setup. Thanks. / Asiri [1] http://llvm.org/docs/HowToAddABuilder.html -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160527/0b19d1eb/attachment.html>

...libc++ (ninja cxx cxxabi). On the second stage, re-configure with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX and build the rest of the tools. We have a downstream builder that works this way to avoid a libstdc++ defect on the host platform. I can't remember the exact details, can dig them up if it helps. Cheers, / Asiri [1] http://libcxx.llvm.org/docs/UsingLibcxx.html > > Since building all of llvm required CXX and using libcxx with the same > version as the rest of llvm makes sense, I would certainly appreciate > an option to build the in-tree libcxx as a first step and use it in when > building...

...install libc++ you can easily work around this by running `ninja install-cxx install-cxxabi` before running any of the LLVM or Clang build targets. /Eric On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 3:38 PM, Asiri Rathnayake > <asiri.rathnayake at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Carsten Mattner via llvm-dev > > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> > >> When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that...

When I tried to build with -DLLVM_ENABLE_LIBCXX, I found out that it doesn't try to use the in-tree libcxx but looks for one built and installed in the system. Since building all of llvm required CXX and using libcxx with the same version as the rest of llvm makes sense, I would certainly appreciate an option to build the in-tree libcxx as a first step and use it in when building llvm, lld,

On 11 July 2016 at 15:30, Craig, Ben <ben.craig at codeaurora.org> wrote: > What C library is being used? Maybe newlocale with the empty string returns > NULL with that C library. (Ubuntu EGLIBC 2.19-0ubuntu6.3) This is the exact same machine in the exact same configuration that we were using for the old builder, just changed the master configuration. > My suspicion is that the

Hi, We set up a new mail server and moved users' "cur,new and tmp" folders only into new mail server from old server.In other words we did not copy and paste dovecot.index,dovecot-uidlist,etc into new server from old server because they were created automatically.After bringing the new server up,users(microsoft office outlook) complained their imap folders are missing.I investigated

well, top-of-branch lldb uses this code, that's how I found it. Do you mean libc++'s demangler? FYI when I said 14+% (and now it's 17%), I mean the overall performance of starting lldb, not just the demangler itself. It's probably several times faster now with this change (https://reviews.llvm.org/D32500) On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Vedant Kumar <vsk at apple.com>