search for: ashishcseitbhu

...la at gmail.com> wrote: > If you are getting a parse error it is very likely a different bug. In > that bug the issue is that we don't parse the function bodies to find > if some inline in them defines (or uses) a given symbol. > > On 26 March 2015 at 13:30, Ashish Saxena <ashishcseitbhu at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks for response Francois . Do you have any pointers on what can be > the > > issue here or something I can try out. I saw similar active bug in llvm > > database > > > > https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 > > > > T...

...he issue here or something I can try out. I saw similar active bug in llvm database https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5623 Thanks Ashish On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:52 PM, Francois Pichet <pichet2000 at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Ashish Saxena <ashishcseitbhu at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi , >> I am trying to enable link time optimization for my projects. Few of >> them has inline assembly which works perfectly with clang/llvm but on >> enabling LTO I get following error >> >> LLVM ERROR: Error parsing in...

Hi , I am trying to enable link time optimization for my projects. Few of them has inline assembly which works perfectly with clang/llvm but on enabling LTO I get following error LLVM ERROR: Error parsing inline asm <inline asm>:103:2 : error 0: unknown use of instruction mnemonic without a size suffix <inline asm>:104:16 : error 0: invalid operand for instruction <inline