search for: ashford

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91333 Bug ID: 91333 Summary: Connecting second of two monitors to a Lenovo W520 causes displays to go crazy Product: xorg Version: unspecified Hardware: Other OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium

...and it starts again from scratch. Hence all file ownership / ACLs on this samba server become invalid. Anyone else seen this? Why does it see fit to destroy this important file in such a casual manner?! It didn't even bother to make a backup copy. Thanks in advance for any help... Simon Ashford. ------------------------------------------------------------------- This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential and/or privileged material; it is for the intended addressee(s) only. If you are not a named addressee, you must not use, retain or disclose such information. NPL Manageme...

Misha Brukman wrote: >On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:35:02AM +1200, Peter Ashford wrote: > > >>Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for >>interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native compilation? You >>can't emit the one kind of output for either end target (interpretted >>bytecode or native compilation)?...

Reid Spencer wrote: >Yes, that's right! > >In fact, shortly the process of doing that will get easier with the >llvmc (compiler driver) tool that I'm working on. You write your >compiler to generate either bytecode or LLVM assembly and a > > Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native

On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 10:35:02AM +1200, Peter Ashford wrote: > Does that mean the front end must decide between emiting bytecode for > interpretting/JITing and LLVM assembly for native compilation? You > can't emit the one kind of output for either end target (interpretted > bytecode or native compilation)? Not at all, there's...

Hi There, I've just started reading about LLVM and I just wanted to make sure that it can do what I was hoping it could do. Am I correct in assuming that I could use LLVM as a backend for a compiler, emiting LLVM byte codes which could either be natively compiled (Sparc and x86) or byte code interpretted / JITed??

...of it (optimization, linking, codegen) can be done with existing LLVM tools. If you later want to include those features in your compiler, you can (via the C++ interface) and just reconfigure your compiler's configuration file. Welcome to LLVM, Peter! Reid. On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 15:13, Peter Ashford wrote: > Hi There, > > I've just started reading about LLVM and I just wanted to make sure that > it can do what I was hoping it could do. Am I correct in assuming that > I could use LLVM as a backend for a compiler, emiting LLVM byte codes > which could either be nativel...

Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason a0 on CPU 0. Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: You have some hardware problem, likely on the PCI bus. Nov 12 08:54:27 steerpike kernel: Dazed and confused, but trying to continue Would my Digium TDM410P cause an NMI, or is my computer failing? - Mike

Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805

Has anyone succeeded in building LLVM on windows?

Hi I'm currently using a windows image processing application that regularly writes the user's image adjustments out to a 'sidecar' file in the same directory as the original image. When the original file is on a local disk this works fine but when the original image is on Samba share, the sidecars are not created. The application reports the following in its log: 2012-07-14