search for: asci_purple

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 29 matches for "asci_purple".

2012 Nov 13
0
[LLVMdev] Help turn the vectorizer bot green
The vectorizer buildbot currently shows 4 miscompiles: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-x86_64-darwin10-nt-O3-vectorize/builds/1727/steps/lnt.nightly-test/logs/tests.FAIL MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc.execution_time MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.execution_time MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset.execution_time MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/power/power.execution_time I had looked at the first one (oggenc) a couple of weeks ago, and because there is only one significant source file, it was straigh...
2012 Jun 20
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
...llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.30=3> 2.37% 2.0844 > 2.1339 0.0010 3.22% 0.0010 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.162=3> 2.35% 0.4337 > 0.4439 0.0002 1.79% 0.0002 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.310=3> 2.32% 2.7068 > 2.7695 0.0071 1.48% 0.0071 > MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.243=3> 2.28% 0.9968 > 1.0195 0.0005 2.89% 0.00...
2011 Apr 30
2
[LLVMdev] Greedy register allocation
...tput/bigfib -3.4% External/SPEC/CFP2000/183.equake/Output/183.equake -3.2% MultiSource/Applications/hbd/Output/hbd -3.1% MultiSource/Applications/minisat/Output/minisat -3.0% MultiSource/Benchmarks/tramp3d-v4/Output/tramp3d-v4 -2.9% External/skidmarks10/Output/skidmarks -2.9% MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/Output/smg2000 -2.8% External/SPEC/CINT95/132.ijpeg/Output/132.ijpeg -2.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/Output/telecomm-gsm -2.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/Output/toast -2.7% External/SPEC/CINT95/134.perl/Output/134.perl -2.6% MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediaben...
2012 Jun 25
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
...ault/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.30=3> 2.37% 2.0844 >> 2.1339 0.0010 3.22% 0.0010 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.162=3> 2.35% 0.4337 >> 0.4439 0.0002 1.79% 0.0002 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.310=3> 2.32% 2.7068 >> 2.7695 0.0071 1.48% 0.0071 >> MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.243=3> 2.28% 0.9968 >> 1.01...
2012 Jul 05
2
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
...ph?test.30=3> 2.37% 2.0844 >>> 2.1339 0.0010 3.22% 0.0010 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.162=3> 2.35% 0.4337 >>> 0.4439 0.0002 1.79% 0.0002 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.310=3> 2.32% 2.7068 >>> 2.7695 0.0071 1.48% 0.0071 >>> MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.243=3> 2.28% 0.99...
2011 Jul 24
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 > 1.8199 0.0047 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314 > 0.0251 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856 > 4.8764 0.0186 > MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd.compile 6.34% 1.7050 1.8131 0.0110 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.c...
2012 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] Exception handling slowdown?
...7% 2.0844 >>>> 2.1339 0.0010 3.22% 0.0010 >>>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.162=3> 2.35% 0.4337 >>>> 0.4439 0.0002 1.79% 0.0002 >>>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.310=3> 2.32% 2.7068 >>>> 2.7695 0.0071 1.48% 0.0071 >>>> MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.243=...
2013 Sep 14
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
...ctionCombiningPass". The top 5 benchmarks are listed as follows: SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue-38.46% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-19.30% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa-12.94% MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes-12.68% MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000-10.68% Unfortunately, there are also two serious execution-time performance regressions: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding204.19% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polybench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog44.58% By looking into the simple_types_constant_fo...
2009 Mar 09
2
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] cfarm-x86-64 x86_64 nightly tester results
...ks/Shootout/hash: -25.67% (9.70 => 12.19) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Shootout/methcall: 23.51% (7.74 => 5.92) > multisource/Applications/lambda-0.1.3/lambda: 18.80% (8.67 => 7.04) > multisource/Applications/minisat/minisat: 13.07% (24.25 => 21.08) > multisource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000: -7.93% (10.84 => 11.70) > JIT: > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll: -7.34% (14.30 => 15.35) > singlesource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding: 36.05% (25.05 => 16.02) > singlesource/Benchmarks/CoyoteBench/fftbench: -381.65% (1.09...
2011 Jul 24
0
[LLVMdev] [llvm-testresults] bwilson__llvm-gcc_PROD__i386 nightly tester results
...hmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 >> 1.8199 0.0047 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314 >> 0.0251 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856 >> 4.8764 0.0186 >> MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd.compile 6.34% 1.7050 1.8131 0.0110 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberW...
2013 Sep 13
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
At 2013-09-09 13:07:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/09/2013 05:18 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Also, I wonder if your runs include the dependence analysis. If this is >>> the
2015 Feb 26
5
[LLVMdev] [RFC] AArch64: Should we disable GlobalMerge?
Hi all, I've started looking at the GlobalMerge pass, enabled by default on ARM and AArch64. I think we should reconsider that, at least for AArch64. As is, the pass just merges all globals together, in groups of 4KB (AArch64, 128B on ARM). At the time it was enabled, the general thinking was "it's almost free, it doesn't affect performance much, we might as well use it".
2013 Sep 17
4
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Compile-time and Execution-time analysis for the SCEV canonicalization
...ctionCombiningPass". The top 5 benchmarks are listed as follows: SingleSource/Regression/C++/2003-09-29-NonPODsByValue-38.46% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/flops-19.30% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/himenobmtxpa-12.94% MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/ecbdes/ecbdes-12.68% MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000-10.68% Unfortunately, there are also two serious execution-time performance regressions: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/simple_types_constant_folding204.19% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Polyb! ench/linear-algebra/solvers/dynprog/dynprog44.58% By looking into the simple_types_constant_...
2012 Feb 19
2
[LLVMdev] Problem While Running Test Suite
...MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/drop3/drop3 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uuencode/uuencode | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/BitBench/uudecode/uudecode | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-blowfish/security-blowfish | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/network-patricia/network-patricia | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/security-...
2013 Jul 28
0
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
...0.0638 0.31446540880501 Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/primes/primes 0.1916 0.1923 0.36534446764092 Benchmarks/TSVC/GlobalDataFlow-flt/GlobalDa 1.2514 1.2567 0.42352565127056 Benchmarks/Olden/power/power 0.7097 0.7129 0.45089474425813 Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 1.4904 1.4972 0.45625335480408 Applications/lemon/lemon 0.6774 0.6805 0.45763212282255 Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-FFT/telecomm-ff 0.0209 0.021 0.47846889952154 Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark 5.9521 5.9811...
2008 Feb 03
0
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
....00 0.00 * 0.62 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi | 0.0542 6944 0.0405 * 0.0393 | 21.15 38.19 19.29 * 19.40 | 0.55 1.10 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 | 3.4553 637348 4.8566 * 4.0849 | 10.71 12.59 10.20 * 14.23 | 0.85 1.05 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3.1/fhourstones3.1 | 0.0767 10752 0.0642 * 0...
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....00 0.00 * 0.67 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi | 0.0560 7044 0.0480 * 0.0440 | 22.23 37.97 23.59 * 23.68 | 0.59 0.94 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 | 4.5362 620828 7.2964 * 6.2523 | 22.45 29.95 23.41 * 31.07 | 0.75 0.96 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3.1/fhourstones3.1 | 0.0680 10208 0.0640 * 0...
2013 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] IR Passes and TargetTransformInfo: Straw Man
Andy and I briefly discussed this the other day, we have not yet got chance to list a detailed pass order for the pre- and post- IPO scalar optimizations. This is wish-list in our mind: pre-IPO: based on the ordering he propose, get rid of the inlining (or just inline tiny func), get rid of all loop xforms... post-IPO: get rid of inlining, or maybe we still need it, only
2008 Jan 24
6
[LLVMdev] 2.2 Prerelease available for testing
LLVMers, The 2.2 prerelease is now available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.2/ If anyone can help test this release, I ask that you do the following: 1) Build llvm and llvm-gcc (or use a binary). You may build release (default) or debug. You may pick llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, or both. 2) Run 'make check'. 3) In llvm-test, run 'make TEST=nightly report'. 4) When
2007 Sep 18
0
[LLVMdev] 2.1 Pre-Release Available (testers needed)
....00 0.00 * 0.63 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Applications/viterbi/viterbi | 0.0455 7084 0.0391 * 0.0384 | 14.87 22.99 18.32 * 18.38 | 0.65 0.81 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000 | 2.9651 620820 4.2171 * 3.6177 | 10.00 13.34 10.16 * 13.94 | 0.75 0.98 n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Fhourstones-3.1/fhourstones3.1 | 0.0694 10680 0.0606 * 0...