Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "asan_handle_no_return".
Did you mean:
__asan_handle_no_return
2014 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
On 10 October 2014 15:30, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugenis at google.com> wrote:
> Could this be some kind of linker-generated compatibility magic?
I'm not sure. Searching for "____asan_handle_no_return_veneer" on
Google gets me this thread. :)
I'm tempted to disable that test on ARM+Linux, since we use EHABI
instead of SjLj... At least for now...
--renato
2014 Oct 10
2
[LLVMdev] Remaining Compiler-RT failures in ARM
On 10 October 2014 21:31, Jonathan Roelofs <jonathan at codesourcery.com> wrote:
> Sounds like an arm-thumb interworking veneer, generated by the linker... the
> real function should be called 'asan_handle_no_return' (with some number of '_'
> prefixing it. I don't remember how many get added).
It is a veneer which has just a jump and a word after it, which points
to a place in memory that had which I believe was the implementation
of the asan check.
I was wondering if the no_return on tha...