search for: as2.1

Hi, I installed AS2.1 kernel 2.4.9-e.16 and Emulex driver v4.21g to connect Fujitsu raid through FC(fiber channel) cable. I met the lock problem by the follwoing operations: fdisk /dev/sdbX e2mkfs -j /dev/sdbX mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/raid/X // run 16 sample programs for each mount point // pulled the FC cable and then some jobs abended. // 1 or 2 jobs were still running. // 'ps

We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS 1.0.12-2 for IA64 Redhat AS2.1 e.43 kernel. Due to Kernel ABI incompatibility between < e.43 and e.43, 1.0.12-1 does not load on e.43. It errors out with a list of missing symbols. The rpms can be downloaded from http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs/files/RedHat/RHAS2.1/ia64/ Click on 1.0.12-2. Other than a build with the newer kernel, there are

All, We are pleased to announce the release of OCFS 1.0.13-1. The list of changes are listed below. For the UnitedLinux/SuSe release, the i686 and IA64 rpms have been built with the latest kernel, SP3-241. For the Redhat AS2.1 IA64 release, the rpms have been built with the e.43 kernel. The module will not load on AS2.1 IA64 kernels < e.43. For Redhat i686 kernels, Redhat's kernel ABI

Specs: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 Shared Storage: Dell/EMC CX600 naviagentcli-6.19.0.4.14-1.noarch.rpm PowerPath 4.4 Post navisphere shuttingdown, The ocfs service attempts to stop Then I get errors: Ocfs:Unmounting drive on [privatenic] 7959 err: unable to sendmsg error: -101,

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

We had a situation over the weekend with our production database that we can't figure out, hoping someone can shed some light. Specifics: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 All database, redo, undo, and control files are on ocfs, archived logs are on ext3. We shut down the database for san

This Proliant (ml330 G3) has an HP CSB-6 (LSI/Megaraid) disk controller that isn't recognised by the installer. A quick search on Google reveals drivers from RH7 - AS2.1 but nothing for 3 or 4 unless anyone knows different!? If not I'll just have to disable it and install a supported RAID card. Anyone!? Nigel

Hello all, I am trying to setup a menu to boot into various windows/linux options and also local boot using pxe. The following is the menu I am using. I tested various options and all worked fine except the localboot. If I choose localboot option the menu leads to pxe of the second nic on the system and then hangs. Anyone has a clue what's happening. Any help would be appreciated

Hi, i have a problem with samba3 (with ldapsam). I've set up my samba3 beta2 (also tried beta3) as a pdc, but it seems that samba does not anounce it's DOMAIN correctly. I don't see my JOCHENGROUP Domain from any Windows-Workstation. I can search for the name of my PDC using the 'Search Computer' Function and Windows will find it. I can doubleclick the PDC and login using

Hi I've upgraded my OS from Redhat AS2.1 to Redhat AS4. The samba upgraded from samba-2.2.7-3.21as to samba-3.0.10-1.4E.9. I use this only to see the Linux filesystem as a drive on my PC. The problem is that I cannot rename a file. Put, Get and Copy works fine. The error I get (after about 30 sec) is any of the following (no specific pattern): "Cannot rename filename:

Full_Name: Gordon Lack Version: 2.4.0 OS: Redhat Linux AS2.1 Submission from: (NULL) (198.28.92.5) Not sure whether this is a configure issue or an R one. It's only a minor issue, so this is really just FYI. The code in configure checks for the version of makeinfo by splitting the version string into a major and minor component. The tests on these assume they are numeric. RHAS2.1 shipped

When I was trying to compile R-1.9.1 from source, I've got problems which seemed related to compiling the LAPACK package. The error message is as follows: gcc -shared -L/usr/local/lib -o libRlapack.so dlamc.lo dlapack0.lo dlapack1.lo dlapack2.lo dlapack3.lo cmplx.lo -lblas -L/usr/local/lib -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-redhat-linux/2.96 -L/usr/lib/gcc-lib/ia64-redhat-linux/2.96/../../.. -lg2c

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Skipped content of type multipart/alternative

Specs: Oracle 9.2.0.4 OS is Redhat AS2.1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-summit-1.0.12-1 ocfs-tools-1.0.10-1 ocfs-support-1.0.10-1 ocfs-2.4.9-e-enterprise-1.0.12-1 Shared Storage: Dell/EMC CX600 naviagentcli-6.19.0.4.14-1.noarch.rpm PowerPath 4.4 My system was originally installed by Dell. Since then I've upgraded the OCFS and a few other pkgs. But ever since the beginning the ocfs drives mounted on boot.

TEST: ===== SAMBA STRESS OVER GIGABIT NETWORK: This is a simple Read/Write/Compare/Delete kind of test over the network via Samba. Multiple clients with multiple threads try to read/write/compare/delete(in a loop) a finite sized file (64K block size) over samba for a prolonged period of time in an effort to stress test the server. SERVER SIDE CONFIG: =================== ARCH: x86 OS: RHL AS

Hi Bharat/Philip, I haven't tested it yet. My systems are running RHAS 2.1. I'll come back to let you now the outcome. Regards, Robert. -----Original Message----- From: Bharat_Sajnani@Dell.com To: robert.blok@logicacmg.com Sent: 3/10/2004 7:09 PM Subject: RE: [Ocfs-users] copy error + control file corruption in ocfs 1.10 Hi Robert, Have you had a chance to retest this issue with the

Another question. When my database is running, I do [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ cp --o_direct xdb01.dbf /tmp cp: cannot open `xdb01.dbf' for reading: Permission denied [oracle@LNCSTRTLDB03 LPTE3]$ When the database is shudown it works. Is this normal for ocfs because with any other filesystem I can just copy a file at any time (Its only a testing, I know I cant copy datafiles and have

Wim, Thanks for your prompt response on this. The tpmC figures look very impressive, and tpmC is read intensive. I had already read note 236679.1 "Comparing Performance Between RAW IO vs OCFS vs EXT2/3" which I guess is the article to which you are referring; it made me suspect that the poor performance was due to the lack of an OS IO cache but I wasn't sure. The database is