search for: arx

I have obtained from transfer functions, the state space matrices for the following state space model. x* = Ax + Bu y = Cx + Du I have A, B, C, and D, now I would like to take the exogenous inputs and simulate the data using the state space model. I know there is a simulate function in the package dse1, but I am unsure as to what type of TSmodel to create to put into it. Could anyone give me

Dear all, I just have a short question regarding the forecasting of ARIMA models with external regressors. I tried to program a ARX(1) model arx.mod <- arima(reihe.lern, order = c(1, 0, 0), seasonal = list(order = c(0, 0, 0), period = 52), xreg = lern.design, include.mean = TRUE) for which I need to estimate the next (105th) value. Xreg=lern.design is - at this time - 104 rows long. I tried to use the following function: p...

...vwv[ 9]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[10]= 0 (0x0) smb_vwv[11]= 0 (0x0) smb_bcc=512 [...] Doing a grep for "read_file" I can see the following: [...] read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 818688, size = 512, returned 512 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arx.adf): pos = 137216, size = 512, returned 512 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 831488, size = 512, returned 512 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arc.adf): pos = 830976, size = 512, returned 512 read_file (daten/covers/dhm_offset/o1000c/arx.adf): pos = 135168,...

...th no response, figured I will ask here too. I have been using openvpn for quite a while, no major problems encountered. Now I need to allow the server to access the lan of the client, and I can not figure out the routing. This is what I have after the tunnel is brought up: SERVER (A.A.A.A) Arx:~# ip addr ... 3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000 link/ether 00:04:e2:09:6c:ea brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.13.1/24 brd 192.168.13.255 scope global eth1 ... 5: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST,NOARP,UP,10000> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fa...

...running 2.2.3a. Any thoughts? TIA. smbd/service.c:make_connection(651) forman (192.168.100.14) connect to service cad as user rich (uid=506, gid=100) (pid 17884) smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(631) open_mode_check: exlusive oplock left by process 17884 after break ! For fileDRV/periscope/PScope15.arx, dev = 801, inode = 1193703. Deleting it to continue... smbd/open.c:open_mode_check(635) open_mode_check: Existent process 17884 left active oplock. locking/locking.c:share_modes_identical(560) PANIC: share_modes_identical: share_mode missmatch (e1 = 32, e2 = 32800). Logic error. lib/util.c:smb_p...

...now several that would like to ha linux at work but cant since it cant run AutoCad. --- Matts <kivik@firstlinux.net> wrote: >Great, it sounds as if it can be working seriously sooon. > >Is there any way a non wine developer can help with point 3 in the HOWTO ? = >(ie finding why ARX apps hang). Solving that will solve a lot of the other = >points and it will be closer to wider usage. > >3) Open SYSTEM.REG file in ~/.wine and remove ALL lines with >LOADCTRLS=3D....... and save it. >Don't ask why, I dunno but this prevents loading of an ARX >app that hangs...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I am trying to use rsync to backup a filesystem to another computer on a local network, but when I use rsync -arx / some.host:backup rsync still tries to copy everything from all mounted filesystems. Is there a bug, or is there a better way to do what I want than this? Thanks. - -- Clarke's Corollary: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced. Thomas Stivers e-mail: stivers_t@t...

Has anyone tested AutoCad 2000 with any recent wine ? Once upon a time I got Autocad R13 to work, only toolbars and screenrefresh was not working to 100%, then it broke completely, and 10 months ago when I tested with AutoCad 2000 it was still broken. Has anyone done any testing recently ? AutoCad and Quark express are two very important pieces of software for wine, since they both lack

Hi, trying to build syslinux on Linux. Please help. bash-2.05b$ uname -a Linux bongo 2.4.32-ARXc3 COHERENT #4-ARX (Build 2660) Sun May 21 15:35:22 CEST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux bash-2.05b$ BUILD/syslinux-3.11/opt/nasm-0.98.38-2/bin/nasm -version NASM version 0.98.38 compiled on Jun 26 2006 But failed with: + make NASM=/home/axel/p/rpm/BUILD/syslinux-3.11/opt/nasm/bin /nasm /home/axel/p...

...stomInserter(). How does this look? It's a big patch, but it basically does this: - Adds ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP and ATOMIC_SWAP nodes, and ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD_I{32,64}, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_I{32,64} and ATOMIC_SWAP_I{32,64} pseudo-instructions with custom inserters. - Replaces L[WD]ARX and ST[WD]CX pseudo-instructions with the actual PPC instructions they represent. - Removes CMP_UNRESERVE nodes and CMP_UNRES[wd]{,i} pseudo- instructions. Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/ -------------- next part -------------- Index: lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCISelLowering.h ============...

...eudo instructions > are only used in three places, so it shouldn't be a huge change. > I need to generate labels in PPCTargetLowering::LowerAtomicCMP_SWAP > however: how do I do that? FWIW the code it needs to emit is: > > ; inputs: ptr, oldval, newval > loop: > lwarx $tmp, 0, $ptr > cmpw $oldval, $tmp > bne- exit > stwcx. $newval, 0, $ptr > bne- loop > exit: > ... > > > Cheers, > Gary > > -- > http://gbenson.net/ > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers...

...he lowering if possible; the pseudo instructions are only used in three places, so it shouldn't be a huge change. I need to generate labels in PPCTargetLowering::LowerAtomicCMP_SWAP however: how do I do that? FWIW the code it needs to emit is: ; inputs: ptr, oldval, newval loop: lwarx $tmp, 0, $ptr cmpw $oldval, $tmp bne- exit stwcx. $newval, 0, $ptr bne- loop exit: ... Cheers, Gary -- http://gbenson.net/

...moves the register into the FPSCR. MTFSF, + /// ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP - These + /// correspond to the llvm.atomic.load.add, llvm.atomic.cmp.swap + /// and llvm.atomic.swap intrinsics. + ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP, + /// LARX = This corresponds to PPC l{w|d}arx instrcution: load and /// reserve indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. LARX, @@ -160,10 +165,6 @@ /// indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. STCX, - /// CMP_UNRESERVE = Test for equality and &quot...

PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter has a reference to the current MachineFunction for other purposes. Can you use MachineFunction::getRegInfo instead? Dan On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Gary Benson wrote: > Would it be acceptable to change MachineInstr::getRegInfo from private > to public so I can use it from > PPCTargetLowering::EmitInstrWithCustomInserter? > >

...moves the register into the FPSCR. MTFSF, + /// ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP - These + /// correspond to the llvm.atomic.load.add, llvm.atomic.cmp.swap + /// and llvm.atomic.swap intrinsics. + ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP, + /// LARX = This corresponds to PPC l{w|d}arx instrcution: load and /// reserve indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. LARX, @@ -160,10 +165,6 @@ /// indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. STCX, - /// CMP_UNRESERVE = Test for equality and &quot...

Hi Gary, This does not patch cleanly for me (PPCISelLowering.cpp). Can you prepare a updated patch? Thanks, Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Cool, that worked. New patch attached... > > Cheers, > Gary > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. >> >> Evan >> >> On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36

Just cast both values to const TargetRegisterClass*. Evan On Jul 10, 2008, at 7:36 AM, Gary Benson wrote: > Evan Cheng wrote: >> How about? >> >> const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : >> &PPC:G8RCRegClass; >> unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); > > I tried something like that yesterday: > > const

Evan Cheng wrote: > How about? > > const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64Bit ? &PPC:GPRCRegClass : > &PPC:G8RCRegClass; > unsigned TmpReg = RegInfo.createVirtualRegister(RC); I tried something like that yesterday: const TargetRegisterClass *RC = is64bit ? &PPC::GPRCRegClass : &PPC::G8RCRegClass; but I kept getting this error no matter how I arranged it:

...moves the register into the FPSCR. MTFSF, + /// ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP - These + /// correspond to the llvm.atomic.load.add, llvm.atomic.cmp.swap + /// and llvm.atomic.swap intrinsics. + ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD, ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP, ATOMIC_SWAP, + /// LARX = This corresponds to PPC l{w|d}arx instrcution: load and /// reserve indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. LARX, @@ -160,10 +165,6 @@ /// indexed. This is used to implement atomic operations. STCX, - /// CMP_UNRESERVE = Test for equality and &quot...

...+ let Uses = [R0] in > >> + def ATOMIC_LOAD_ADD_I32 : Pseudo< > >> > >> The "let Uses = [R0]" is not needed. The pseudo instruction will be > >> expanded like this later: > >> > >> + BuildMI(BB, TII->get(is64bit ? PPC::LDARX : PPC::LWARX), dest) > >> + .addReg(ptrA).addReg(ptrB); > >> + BuildMI(BB, TII->get(is64bit ? PPC::ADD4 : PPC::ADD8), PPC::R0) > >> + .addReg(incr).addReg(dest); > >> + BuildMI(BB, TII->get(is64bit ? PPC::STDCX : PPC::STWCX)) > >> +...