search for: arvind

...t). When I try to build llvm-2.1, the build freezes with the following output.. /scratchbox/compilers/arm-softfloat-linux-gcc-3.4.4-cs-2005q3-2-glibc-2.3.6/bin/sbox-arm-softfloat-linux-gnu-nm: 'libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx_s.o': No such file mv -f libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.visT libgcc/./_dvmd_lnx.vis /home/arvind/tools/llvm/llvm_build/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/arvind/tools/llvm/llvm_build/./gcc/ -B/opt/llvm//arm-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ -B/opt/llvm//arm-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem /opt/llvm//arm-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem /opt/llvm//arm-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -O2 -O2 -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -W -Wall...

.... I just wanted to know if there is any way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static functions when they are not being called anywhere inside the current module. Other compilers seem to generate intermediate code (lcc, for instance). Thanks for your reply..Olivier. Sincerely Arvind On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Olivier Meurant <meurant.olivier at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Arvind, > > you need to use it effectively : > > > static int add(int a, int b) { >         return a+b; > } > int use() { >         return add(4,5); > } > > ==&g...

Ah ok. Sorry. :) I think that argument "-femit-all-decls" will help you. Olivier. On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 9:18 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam < arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry for not being specific. I just wanted to know if there is any > way at all to force clang to generate intermediate code for static > functions when they are not being called anywhere inside the current...

Hi all, I had little success installing llvm inside scratchbox for an ARM build so have been trying to generate assembly code for arm using the llc utility. However, llc fails to generate code for arm. Output is as below... arvind at zeus:~/tools/llvm/del$ llc main.bc -o mainarm -filetype=asm -march=arm -f llc: ARMISelDAGToDAG.cpp:73: llvm::SDOperand LowerCALL(llvm::SDOperand, llvm::SelectionDAG&): Assertion `isVarArg == false && "VarArg not supported"' failed. llc[0x85335ac] [0xffffe420] [0xffffe4...

HI Arvind, I think you are using an old llc version. VarArg support was implemented a long time ago. Lauro 2008/1/28, Arvind Ayyangar <arvind.ayyangar at gmail.com>: > Hi all, > I had little success installing llvm inside scratchbox for an ARM > build so have been trying to generate as...

...of the functions are declared as static and clang ignores these functions: One of the functions is: static void innerloop(double a, const double* b, double* c, double beta) { *b = a*beta; return; } Is there any way to make clang generate llvm code for the static functions? Thanks Sincerely Arvind -- Arvind Sudarsanam Utah State University Phone: (435) 512-7769 E-mail: theonemorpheus at gmail.com Web-site: http://cc.usu.edu/~asudarsanam

Hi Arvind, you need to use it effectively : static int add(int a, int b) { return a+b; } int use() { return add(4,5); } ==> ; ModuleID = '<stdin>' target datalayout = "e-p:32:32:32-i1:8:8-i8:8:8-i16:16:16-i32:32:32-i64:32:64-f32:32:32-f64:32:64-v64:64:64-v128:128:12...

Hi Sorry for the late reply.. I managed to build the latest release of llvm. Now I get the following error when I try creating the bitcode file: llvm-gcc: --emit-llvm is not supported in this configuration. The configure options were : /home/arvind/llvm/llvm-gcc4.2-2.1.source/configure --prefix=/opt/llvm/ --enable-threads --disable-nls --disable-shared --enable-languages=c --enable-sjlj-exceptions --program-prefix=llvm- On Jan 28, 2008 8:18 PM, Lauro Ramos Venancio <lauro.venancio at gmail.com> wrote: > HI Arvind, > > I thi...

...I have searched the web and I am not able to fathom what the problem and its fix is. I have GCC 4.6.3 running on a Ubuntu 12.04 LTS x86-64. Please let me know what the fix is. I also tried installing the Debug+Asserts build from the svn. It generates an error while installing. Thanks in advance, Arvind -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20121108/0eaaa51d/attachment.html>

Forwarding to llvmdev. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: *Dmitri Gribenko* Date: Friday, November 9, 2012 Subject: [LLVMdev] MODULE_CODE_GLOBALVAR error To: Arvind Haran <arvi90 at gmail.com> On Friday, November 9, 2012, Arvind Haran wrote: > The last few lines of the build: It looks like you don't have enough RAM to link the debug binary. > > clang: error: unable to execute command: Killed > clang: error: linker command failed due...

...524544, metadata !9, metadata !"u", metadata !2, i32 3, metadata !6} ; [DW_TAG_auto_variable ] >From here, I am trying invain to access the variable name. Is there something wrong in my approach? I feel that I have not understood the method to access metadata in llvm. Thanks Regards Arvind On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Devang Patel <devang.patel at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam > <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I have the following source code: >> >> long f...

...Example: %arrayidx = getelementptr inbounds i32* getelementptr inbounds ([10 x i32]* @k, i32 0, i32 0), i32 %tmp2 ; <i32*> [#uses=1] I am unable to get a handle on the second "getelementptr" in this instruction. Can anyone plee let me know if I am missing something here? Thanks Arvind -- Arvind Sudarsanam Utah State University Phone: (435) 512-7769 E-mail: theonemorpheus at gmail.com Web-site: http://cc.usu.edu/~asudarsanam

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Arvind Sudarsanam <arvind.sudarsanam at aggiemail.usu.edu> wrote: > Hi Devang, > > Thanks for your reply. You mentioned > " First parameter is the compiler generated temp. and 3rd parameter > provides info about the variable, including its name 'u'." > > I did...

Hi, I am generating llvm IR code for C source code using clang as the front end. I am wondering if there is any way of mapping an llvm IR line number back to its C source code line number. Thanks Sincerely Arvind -- Arvind Sudarsanam Utah State University Phone: (435) 512-7769 E-mail: theonemorpheus at gmail.com Web-site: http://cc.usu.edu/~asudarsanam

...th LLVM and Open64 and has some qualitative comparisons between the two. Maybe, in terms of (a) Ease of developing new passes (2) Ease of debugging (3) Quality of results (4) Support for developers (5) Documentation (6) Ability to retarget towards multi core processors. Thanks in advance Sincerely Arvind CPU Technology Software Engineer

...data bss dec hex filename 2315 184 0 2499 9c3 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.o File size After adding 'const': text data bss dec hex filename 2347 152 0 2499 9c3 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.o Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c index 4e8e27d..012d5bc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm...

...data bss dec hex filename 2315 184 0 2499 9c3 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.o File size After adding 'const': text data bss dec hex filename 2347 152 0 2499 9c3 drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.o Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs at gmail.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm.c index 4e8e27d..012d5bc 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/virtio/virtgpu_ttm...

On 21/01/2008, Arvind Ayyangar <arvind.ayyangar at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > I am new to LLVM and have been trying to get it working on > scratchbox (ARM target). When I try to build llvm-2.1, the build > freezes with the following output.. > I have build llvm inside scratchbox sometime ago...

Hi Arvind, To use llvm inside scratchbox you must use a newer qemu. See http://setanta.wordpress.com/2007/11/20/qemu-arm-eabi-no-scratchbox/ (in Portuguese, but the important things are in bash :) ) I don't know if it is the problem in this case, but it should be the first attempt. Lauro 2008/1/21,...

Hi, Arvind Sudarsanam: I know some of Open64. Above all, Open64 is designed for a high performance compiler. It is now supported by AMD, HP, ICT Chinese Academy of Science, etc. and has been ported to X86, Itanium, Loongson CPU etc. And to your questions 1, Open64 already have some main optimization pha...