search for: arulessequ

Package arulesSequences isn't on CRAN for automatic package install. I downloaded a *.tar.qz version because no *.zip for Windows offered. Why is this? I expanded *.tar.qz in ~R/R-2.11.0/library/arulesSequences I then assumed that R would list it in the packages list but it doesn't. What am I doing wrong ? Re...

Hi all, I'm new with R, recently I began to use the package "arulesSequences" but the algorithm cspade give me this error: Error en makebin(data, file) : 'sid' invalid when I did executed this script, x = read_baskets("transactions.basket",sep=",",info=c( "eventID", "sequenceID","SIZE")) s <- cspade...

Hi, I am trying to use the CSPADE function as part of the ArulesSequences package. When running with my own data I get a system invocation error, and also get the same when running the built in example with the zaki data: > example(cspade) And get the following error: preprocessing ...Error in cspade(zaki, parameter = list(support = 0.4), control = list(verbos...

Hi, I'm using the cspade function from the arulesSequences package on linux and keep getting the error: "Error in makebin(data, file) : 'sid' invalid" any information on how to solve this would be much appreciated. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/cspade-error-tp3774834p3774834.html Sent fr...

...accepted. It would seem that I need to ensure that my package works under both architectures (32 and 64 bit). 1) Would this be sufficient to get it accepted? 2) If so, does anyone have any documentation in performing this task, or can someone point me in the right direction? I was told that 'arulesSequences' is an example of a CRAN package while compiles executables. Was this package accepted because it worked under both architectures? or are there other reasons. thanks

I am in the process of creating a package in R which calls pre-compiled C code i.e. '.exe' files In reading the manual, I came across this: "A source package if possible should not contain binary executable files: they are not portable, and a security risk if they are of the appropriate architecture. R CMD check will warn about them2 unless they are listed (one filepath per line) in

I'm in the process of converting some S3 methods to S4 methods. I have this function : setGeneric("enrichmentCalc", function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...){standardGeneric("enrichmentCalc")}) setMethod("enrichmentCalc", c("GenomeDataList", "BSgenome"), function(rs, organism, seqLen, ...) { ... ... ... })

Hi, Current implementation: setequal <- function (x, y) { x <- as.vector(x) y <- as.vector(y) all(c(match(x, y, 0L) > 0L, match(y, x, 0L) > 0L)) } First what about replacing 'match(x, y, 0L) > 0L' and 'match(y, x, 0L) > 0L' with 'x %in% y' and 'y %in% x', respectively. They're strictly equivalent but the latter

...r, as well as the plankton. The package is intended for programs that sample approximately monthly at discrete stations. Updated packages ---------------- actuar (1.1-0), agricolae (1.0-9), AlgDesign (1.1-2), analogue (0.6-23), animation (1.1-0), aroma.affymetrix (1.5.0), aroma.core (1.5.0), arulesSequences (0.1-9), backtest (0.3-1), bayesclust (3.0), bcp (2.1.3), betareg (2.2-0), bio.infer (1.2-8), bipartite (1.07), BoolNet (1.4), BradleyTerry (0.8-8), CADStat (2.2-2), caGUI (0.1-4), caret (4.33), chemometrics (0.8), cocorresp (0.1-9), compHclust (1.0-1), conf.design (1.01), corpcor (1.5.6), cou...