search for: artyom

...hat seems like quite an assumption to make. Clearly, armv6 sub architectures that aren’t v6k will still be v6l in linux. (provided they’re little-endian). I’ve already made that change, and it would be included in any revised diff that I send out. Thanks, - Will > On Jan 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Artyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com> wrote: > > William, what revision of LLVM is your patch based on? > > The trunk hasn't had ARM_ARCH("armv6hl") since r252903 (Nov 12th) > > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Dillon [mailto:william at hous...

Hi I want to cross-compile llvm  for  arm board , running llvm on  Ububtu Server 11.04  x86_64  thank you -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20111017/178ae8fe/attachment.html>

...that aren’t v6k will still be v6l in linux. (provided they’re little-endian). >>> I’ve already made that change, and it would be included in any revised diff that I send out. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> - Will >>> >>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Artyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com <mailto:Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> William, what revision of LLVM is your patch based on? >>>> >>>> The trunk hasn't had ARM_ARCH("armv6hl") since r252903 (Nov 12th) >...

...declare that the community has accepted the proposal, and to update the docs? Or is there any formal deadline for objections to be raised? -----Original Message----- From: meinersbur at googlemail.com [mailto:meinersbur at googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Michael Kruse Sent: 17 October 2016 11:46 To: Artyom Skrobov Cc: LLVM Dev; nd Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Is GCC 4.7 still supported? There was a thread last week[1] when someone also noticed that LLVM doesn't compile with gcc 4.7 anymore. It turned out that it didn't for 3 months already, as there are no more buildbots testing compilation with...

Please include the mailing list on replies. It looks like you're running configure directly in the LLVM source directory(?) I'm not sure if that works for cross builds like this. Try a separate build directory and see if that helps. -Jim On Oct 19, 2011, at 10:57 AM, Artyom Baloyan wrote: > hi > thank you, but i have this problem > > artyom at splab:~/llvm/llvm-2.7$ sudo make > configure: error: Already configured in /home/artyom/llvm/llvm-2.7 > make[1]: Entering directory `/home/artyom/llvm/llvm-2.7/BuildTools' > make[1]: *** No targets spe...

...rInvocation(clang::CompilerInstance*) + 2848 18 clang 0x000000000068d932 cc1_main(char const**, char const**, char const*, void*) + 5650 19 clang 0x0000000000691dd5 main + 757 20 libc.so.6 0x00007f69210fc30d __libc_start_main + 237 21 clang 0x000000000068c25d Stack dump: 0. Program arguments: /home/artyom/llvm-3.0/build/bin/clang -cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -emit-obj -mrelax-all -disable-free -main-file-name sqlite3.c -mrelocation-model static -flattening -mdisable-fp-elim -masm-verbose -mconstructor-aliases -munwind-tables -target-cpu x86-64 -target-linker-version 2.21.53.20110810 -momit-...

...ws.llvm.org/D50314>, but then I was reminded that adding a new backend is not a small thing. So, at this point I require an advice, help or both on how to proceed, and since the patch is quite big I am not sure that a single person would willingly spend time reviewing it entirely. Kind regards, Artyom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180814/4c7338da/attachment.html>

> You assume triples make sense. That's the first mistake everyone does > when thinking about triples. :) I know they don't make sense in many corner cases, but I think discarding logic where it *does* exist is a mistake. > AFAIK, "ARMv7B" is only used by HighBank, which is no more. But that, > too, was "ARMv7A big endian". I believe it's what any

...signed it on puppet master. If somehow puppet agent''s hostname has been changed it will stop communication with puppet master. I would like to know if there is a way to be able to change hostname of puppet agent, without interruption of communication between master and agent. Thanks, Artyom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/59luyETIc-0J. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe fro...

Hello, About a month ago, I submitted a set of patches for review on llvm-commit. The most controversial of the patches, http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/attachments/20150622/d104ea7 1/attachment-0009.obj deals with the fact that before ARMv8, the rGPR RegClass in Thumb encodings didn't include SP; but from ARMv8 onwards, it does include it. RegClass membership is

Taking the suggestions of the group under consideration, I’ve generated a new diff. The thing to note is that armv6l is now treated identically to armv6hl. I’ve also added a unit test. This seems to me to be the least invasive method, and holds to existing conventions as closely as possible. Thoughts? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:

.../reviews.llvm.org/D50856> https://reviews.llvm.org/D50858 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D50858> but the backend itself is still quite large. Anything more I can do to simplify reviewing? > On 15 Aug 2018, at 09:33, Anton Korobeynikov <anton at korobeynikov.info> wrote: > > Hi Artyom, > > I made a very brief run over the patch and indeed it is quite large :) > > Will it be possible to split it to enable better review? For example > I'm seeing you're having some generic codegenerator / TableGen > changes. Will it be possible to separate them out and p...

...I'd have asked the linux guys not to invent a new triple. It's in linux now, and `uname -a` is a very standard way of obtaining the host's triple. James On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 at 08:34 Tim Northover via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > On 4 January 2016 at 14:42, Artyom Skrobov via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A. > > The "armv7l" comes directly from the Linux kernel I believe: "armv7" + > "little-endian" (arch/arm/kernel/setup.c:638 ish). I'm...

...and padding field is not big enough, padding size doesn't get increased automaticly, so you receive an error about corrupted file (tried both with foobar2k and metaflac). But if you previously add more padding with "--add-padding=", everything goes smoothly. -- Best Regards. Karpenko Artyom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac/attachments/20060621/6315b285/attachment.html

thanks for these info. 2009/3/19 Artyom Mikhailov <artyom.mikhailov at gmail.com> > Hi there, > > Great project you have - NUT, thx for the development! > I just thought it might be usefull to let you know that APC SC1500I ups can > be found supported by NUT. > I used the following settings: > [sc1500i] >...

...it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <llvm.buildmaster at lab.llvm.org> Date: Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:16 PM Subject: buildbot failure in LLVM on sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap To: Adrian Prantl <aprantl at apple.com>, Ahmed Bougacha < ahmed.bougacha at gmail.com>, Artyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com>, Bob Wilson <bob.wilson at apple.com>, Bruno Cardoso Lopes <bruno.cardoso at gmail.com>, Chad Rosier <mcrosier at codeaurora.org>, Chris Bieneman <beanz at apple.com>, Daniel Jasper <djasper at google.com>, David Blaikie <db...

>> Going back through SVN history, I cannot find any evidence that ARMv6L ever existed. > > Oh, my bad!! I was thinking of ARMv7l... :/ > > Nevertheless, I'll leave you guys to review this one, as I lost touch with the parser a while ago. Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A. So, if William has to add support for ARMv6L, I'd suggest he adds it as an alias, and

Hello! Almost two years ago, Artyom Goncharov submitted an initial effort for a backend for the Motorola 68000 architecture [1] which was eventually not merged, unfortunately. I elaborated why I supported the idea of such a backend [2]. Recently, we started a fundraising campaign on the platform Bountysource.com to port the M68K bac...

Hello, http://llvm.org/docs/GettingStarted.html#software lists "GCC >=4.7.0" among requirements for building LLVM. However, my attempt of building LLVM+Clang with gcc 4.7.3 has failed with a multitude of errors, such as: lib/LTO/Caching.cpp:74:7: error: looser throw specifier for 'virtual llvm::lto::localCache(std::string, llvm::lto::AddFileFn)::<lambda(unsigned int,

Hi Artyom, please open a bugreport as suggested by clang: ... snipped ... > clang: note: diagnostic msg: Please submit a bug report to http://llvm.org/bugs/ > and include command line arguments and all diagnostic information. > clang: note: diagnostic msg: Preprocessed source(s) are located at: &gt...