search for: artisans

...iles and says the installation cannot continue. Can anyone help me to solve this. Cheers, Kim Details about my system are as follows: Wine Version:1.2-RC Distribution: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala Kernel Version: 2.6.31-21 Generic Application: Artisan Studio 7.1 UNO Application Website: http://www.artisansoftwaretools.com/ Application Description: Artisan Studio UNO is a free single user CASE tool. Web Address of App Download: http://www.artisansoftwaretools.com/download-center/products/ **Note: Requires Free Account Sign-up and Log-In** Output in log.txt: fixme:advapi:LookupAccountNameW (null) L&...

Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing significant performance degradation problems (from 100Mb/s down to 1Mb/s in the worst case) and I'm not sure how to fix this. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, iperf reports ~100Mb/s and rsync reports ~1Mb/s: $ iperf -c 91.224.149.132

Hello, Here's an example that renders correctly using Rd2txt / Rd2latex / R CMD Rd2pdf, but has problems under Rd2HTML: \name{foo} \title{foo} \section{foo}{ This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph This should be on a separate paragraph \Sexpr[stage=render,results=rd]{ paste( rep('Sexpr: This should be on a separate

I''d love to be able to server zvols out as SCSI or FC targets. Are there any plans to add this to ZFS? That would be amazingly awesome. -brian -- "Perl can be fast and elegant as much as J2EE can be fast and elegant. In the hands of a skilled artisan, it can and does happen; it''s just that most of the shit out there is built by people who''d be better suited to

I am afraid a search does not get much on this subject, hence this post. Is there a plan for a Nevada build to include zfs root/boot on Sparc architecture? When? This message posted from opensolaris.org

Hi, This is my first post in this list. I joined it for a little bit special reason that I'll explain. for begginning I'll briefly present myself, I'm french and most implicated in free software promotion in France, I'm working as freelance in free software system administration. No the reason why I joined vorbis-dev, I'm a member of [1]April, an association that promote

On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 09:35 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > Once a thing becomes reliable, it stops being technology. Oh No. Just because something works well it does not stop being "technology" unless the USA people, who have decimated my language (English), have a new definition for "technology". Warren are you serious that things that do not work well are

[Disclaimer : I'm not a network engineer] Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing MTU problems and I'm not sure how to fix them. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, communication hang. And using "tcpdump -i there" displays lines such as : 18:54:00.345666 IP

Phelps, Matthew wrote: > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 11:52 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: >> Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >>> Le 28/02/2019 ? 04:12, Jobst Schmalenbach a ?crit : >>>> I want to lock in the SDA/SDB/SDC for my drives >>> >>> In short : use UUIDs or labels instead of hardcoding /dev/sdX. >>> >>>

Hi, ok I know zfs-fuse is still incomplete and performance has not been considered, but still, before I''m going to use it for my /home I wanted a rough estimate. Another benchmark already asserted that zfs by itself, on Solaris, is a very fast beast (http://cmynhier.blogspot.com/2006/05/zfs-benchmarking.html), faster than ext3 on Linux and also faster than UFS. Interestingly UFS seems

Back in October/November 2007 when I asked about Sparc zfs boot and root capabilities, I got a reply indicating late December 2007 for a possible release. I was wondering what is the status right now, will this feature make it into build 79? This message posted from opensolaris.org

I''m playing around with ZFS and want to figure out the best use of my 6x 300GB SATA drives. The purpose of the drives is to store all of my data at home (video, photos, music, etc). I''m debating between: 6x 300GB disks in a single raidz2 pool --or-- 2x (3x 300GB disks in a pool) mirrored I''ve read up a lot on ZFS, but I can''t really figure out which is

Joris, With the large caveat that I am not Duncan, and thus am not speaking for him, I can see an argument for his claim that I think is, more or less, true. roxygen2 (as far as I know as someone who uses it at least some of the time) maps to only a subset of Rd. It is the most commonly used subset, and so you can do most common things with it, but I think a pretty good case can be made for the

Dear All: stepping in late, but @Joris, if you would like to take 'from a single file' literally, have a look at: https://github.com/bpfaff/lp4rp (lp4rp: literate programming for R packages); Cheers, Bernhard ps: incidentally, within the noweb-file roxygen is employed. -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: R-devel [mailto:r-devel-bounces at r-project.org] Im Auftrag von Joris

Hi. I''m all set for doing performance comparsion between Solaris/ZFS and FreeBSD/ZFS. I spend last few weeks on FreeBSD/ZFS optimizations and I think I''m ready. The machine is 1xQuad-core DELL PowerEdge 1950, 2GB RAM, 15 x 74GB-FC-10K accesses via 2x2Gbit FC links. Unfortunately the links to disks are the bottleneck, so I''m going to use not more than 4 disks, probably.

Is it true that Solaris 10 u4 does not have any of the nice ZIL controls that exist in the various recent Open Solaris flavors? I would like to move my ZIL to solid state storage, but I fear I can''t do it until I have another update. Heck, I would be happy to just be able to turn the ZIL off to see how my NFS on ZFS performance is effected before spending the $''s. Anyone

Hello, i have an 8 port sata-controller and i don''t want to spend the money for 8 x 750 GB Sata Disks right now. I''m thinking about an optimal way of building a growing raidz-pool without loosing any data. As far as i know there are two ways to achieve this: - Adding 750 GB Disks from time to time. But this would lead to multiple groups with multiple redundancy/parity disks. I

The following is a message to be sent to the President of the United States of America. Although we may not be able to do a great deal from where we are, but for the people of America just knowing we care and feel their sadness will help. Please put your name on the following list and send it to all you know and who care. If you are the 100th name and every 100th there on could you please also

I''m putting together a NexentaOS (b65)-based server that has 4 500 GB drives on it. Currently it has two, set up as a ZFS mirror. I''m able to boot Nexenta from it, and it seems to work ok. But, as I''ve learned, the mirror is not properly redundant, and so I can''t just have a drive fail (when I pull one, the OS ends up hanging, and even if I replace it, I have to

Hello, I''m quite interested in ZFS, like everybody else I suppose, and am about to install FBSD with ZFS. On that note, i have a different first question to start with. I personally am a Linux fanboy, and would love to see/use ZFS on linux. I assume that I can use those ZFS disks later with any os that can work/recognizes ZFS correct? e.g. I can install/setup ZFS in FBSD, and later use