search for: articulate

Hello to everyone. I was reading a articule for do that , but this articule is old, so I think some things been changed now, I was reading this one http://www.paulmcnett.com/vfp/wine/vfp-wine-whitepaper.pdf, in a part of it the author says that we have to use a file called "vfpwinepatchwinsize" and we have to type in a terminal Code: cat vfpwinepatchwinsize | patch -p0 and include in

I have a friend who is preparing to set up a small Postfix/Dovecot mail system. There are only approximately 25 users. He wants to use Berkeley DB in a similar fashion to the way Postfix does. I told him I do not believe Dovecot supports that. I could not find any documentation relating to it. 1) Does Dovecot support Berkeley DB? 2) Are their any plans to incorporate that feature into Dovecot?

...1 2 1 [3,] 2 1 4 Where element i,j is the number of items in b that id[i] and id[j] share... So for example, in element [1,3] of the result matrix, I want to see 2. That is, id's 1 and 3 share two common elements in b, namely "a" and "b". This is hard to articulate, so sorry for the terrible description here. The way I have solved it is to do a double loop, looping over every member of the id column and comparing it to every other member of id to see how many elements of b they share. This takes forever. Thanks cn

I understand the concern of uncertain for TCP-over-TCP by BBR, as the BBR is natively designed to optimize TCP, instead of TCP-over-TCP, but could you articulate a bit more about the beneficial of “sending host when there is a UDP tinc tunnel” in the middle”? > On 30 Sep 2017, at 11:23 AM, Ryan Mounce <ryan at mounce.com.au> wrote: > > I'm not aware that BBR claims nor attempts to resolve any of the > inherent issues with TCP-over-T...

...exagon target - the entry block is a loop header. Has someone seen this assert on other targets? What would be a preferable way to fix it: - extend BlockFrequency pass to handle this case, e.g. by inserting a dummy entry block, or - make this BlockFrequncy's assumption/requirement more clearly articulated and avoid creating this situation in a preceding pass (in the particular case, a machine-level loop rotation)? Thanks, Ivan

...e even > the current semantics might produce broken code with parallel stack > accesses. > > However, as this is such a major semantics change to the original one, I'd > like to hear more opinions on it. I suggest you create a (documentation) > patch where the new semantics is articulated and request comments for it at > the LLVM-commits list. I agree with both. I think the extension is very reasonable and I also do not see a reason why this interpretation should cause troubles. However, to get it right it would be good to get this throughly reviewed. Tobias

...what=list(count=1, cusip6="", idate=1, spread=1.1, vol252=1.1, vol1000=1.1, st_debt=1.1, lt_debt=1.1 , total_liab= 1.1, cr=1.1, shrout=1.1, prc=1.1, mkt_cap=1.1, rtng=1.1, sec=1.1, cr3m=1.1, cr5y=1.1, ust3m=1.1, ust5y=1.1), flush=TRUE, nlines=1,quiet=T) ... } The problem is how to articulate "while (the end of the table has not been reached)", or equivalently, how to signal the end of the table? Best Wishes Yuchen Luo [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Dear all, Question: How to merge two data frames such that new column are added in a particular way? I'm not actually sure how to best articulate my question to be honest, so i hope showing you what I want to achieve will communicate my question better. Lets say I have two data frames: > DF1 <- data.frame(cbind(Show=c('Firefly', 'Red Dwarf'), Measure=1:2, Datetime=c('08/26/2009 9:30 AM', '08/26/2009 9:30 A...

Hello, I am using eth0 as my xen management interface. There will no VM connected to the interface. I read a lot of articule about adding a interface and create a new bridge. Some add a ip address to the new interface some don't. Do I really need a IP on all interfaces ? Tx

Table articles has column: author,body,etc Table users has column: login_name,email,etc articles belongs_to user users has many articles foreign_key author references users(login_name) Therefore in Article.rb: belongs_to:article_user, :class_name=>"User", :foreign_key=>"author" and what''s going on? how the rails find the reference

Hi All: Can anyone give me a hint about how to find functions built in in R. based on the articule below it should be something called DIYhelp but I can't find it. Thanks Part of the Kickstarting R package is a little text searching facility called DIYHelp. The program is based upon a simple, brute-force search of the directory tree from the point that you specify. The concept is that you

...Wine installed concurrently? I maintain two apps in the AppDB and have suffered a regression in one of them. So it would be really nice if I could easily switch back and forth between versions of Wine, without uninstalling/reinstalling. Cheers! droid -- I know what I believe. I will continue to articulate what I believe and what I believe - I believe what I believe is right. --George W. Bush * Now that's articulate! *

Hi, Maybe this time somebody help. Thanks -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Problem with Outlook 2010 Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:20:56 +0100 From: pch0317 <pch0317 at gmail.com> To: Dovecot Mailing List <dovecot at dovecot.org> Hi, I use dovecot 2.0. I have problem with Outlook 2010. This application freezes for about 2 minutes when I move or delete messages. Other

...y for people who are creating mocks. I''m supposed to actually be telling them the best way to do it. In some cases we have code with like a bazillion mock(:x) statements and it''s kind of out of control. I have an idea how the specs should look but I don''t have it clearly articulated. I need a way to translate that vague sense for other people without guiding them through the code line by line. Earlier today I caught a spec that took 50 seconds to run, which was just nuts. -- Giles Bowkett Podcast: http://hollywoodgrit.blogspot.com Blog: http://gilesbowkett.blogspot.com Por...

Hi everyone, I've recently begun looking into ways of automating the monitoring of all my servers. Whilst most of the Linux/BSD stuff is sorted, I am having more difficulties gathing the details of the Windows Boxes. The main source of problems is how to retrieve the event log details from a remote machine. During my research I came across some old mailling list articules in 1999 regarding

...ustom client that logs and reports state against upsd. You could run upsmon across the network. However, the shutdown process assumes upsmon is local. However, there's a normal plan, and if what you are doing is even sort of normal, it's likely best to do the normal thing, unless you can articulate why you want something different. So: 0) Read some stuff on the web: https://xyproblem.info/ https://dontasktoask.com/ (not quite on point) 1) Tell us your situation and what you want to accomplish. 2) Tell us why, after having read the docs, you are heading towards a non...

Hi! I have problems with my cellphone. It does not seem to quote the strings to the login command. I can logon using ie SquirrelMail but if i try to login using AndroidMail it just says "autentication failed". If i try maualy i get similar results. Changing password for test to "password-" a login test password- a OK Logged in. Changing password for test to "password

...someone seen this assert on other targets? >> >> What would be a preferable way to fix it: >> - extend BlockFrequency pass to handle this case, e.g. by inserting a >> dummy entry block, or >> - make this BlockFrequncy's assumption/requirement more clearly >> articulated and avoid creating this situation in a preceding pass (in the >> particular case, a machine-level loop rotation)? > > This is unlikely to be a bug in BFI. BFI assumes that LoopInfo is > correct. This has come up before when a pass promised (but failed) to > preserve LoopInfo....

...sts.llvm.org>> wrote: > >   3. All comments by reviewers should be addressed by the patch > author. > It is generally expected that suggested changes will be incorporated > into the next revision of the patch unless the author and/or other > reviewers can articulate a good reason to do otherwise (and then the > reviewers must agree). > > I disagree on the high bar here. The author should acknowledge the > comments; however, addressing all of the comments in one shot has > similar problems as having commits that are too large (diffs between...

...h again in a timely fashion, please communicate that fact in the review.  3. All comments by reviewers should be addressed by the patch author. It is generally expected that suggested changes will be incorporated into the next revision of the patch unless the author and/or other reviewers can articulate a good reason to do otherwise (and then the reviewers must agree). If you suggest changes in a code review, but don't wish the suggestion to be interpreted this strongly, please state so explicitly.  4. Reviewers may request certain aspects of a patch to be broken out into separate patche...