Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "articularly".
Did you mean:
particularly
2007 Jul 15
1
Complex surveys, properly computed SEs and non-parametric analyses
Can someone direct me to an R function that properly computes standard errors of data obtained from a complex survery design, i.e. perform alnalyses similiar to those that can be performed with SUDAAN, particularly for a non-parametric one-way ANOVA, e.g. signed rank test?
Thanks,
John
John Sorkin M.D., Ph.D.
Chief, Biostatistics and Informatics
Baltimore VA Medical Center GRECC,
University of Maryland School of Medicine Claude D. Pepper OAIC,
University of Maryland Clinical Nutrition Research Unit, and
Balt...
2007 Jul 26
2
Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities
This is a public thank you, to whoever wrote the Wiki's for adding 3rd
party repositories, ProtectBase and Priorities. Clear, excellent, step
by step instructions. I did this late last night and I missed the thing
that Priorities is the recommended plugin, so I will change to that,
from ProtectBase. :-) Lanny
2007 Jul 27
0
Re: CentOS] Thank you: Wiki data for adding 3rd party repository, ProtectBase and Priorities
On 26 July 2007, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>The CentOS team is great.
That's an understatement. They are truly putting super effort into this
distribution.
> See who contributed to that articular >article:
>http://wiki.centos.org/Repositories?action=info
The revision history is interesting!
2008 Jul 12
2
[Bug 1487] New: Race condition between monitor and unprivileged child in sshd
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1487
Summary: Race condition between monitor and unprivileged child
in sshd
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.0p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
2009 Apr 23
1
reference counting problem in .Primitive's?
I think the following rather wierd expressions show a problem in how
some of the .Primitive functions evaluate their arguments. I haven't
yet thought of a way that a nonabusive user might run into this problem.
In each case the first argument, x, is modified in the course of
evaluating the second argument and then modified x gets used
as the first argument:
> x<-as.integer(1:5); y
2017 Jun 23
0
Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
> On Jun 23, 2017, at 5:53 AM, Jay Zola <jayjay.1988 at hotmail.nl> wrote:
>
> Dear sir/madame,
>
>
> I am currently writing a meta-analysis on the complication and reoperation rates of 5 different treatment modalities after a distal radius fracture. I was able to pool the rates of the 5 different rates using R. Now I have to compare the pooled rates of the 4 treatment
2017 Jun 23
5
Comparing pooled proportions(complication and reoperation rates) of different treatment modalities
Dear sir/madame,
I am currently writing a meta-analysis on the complication and reoperation rates of 5 different treatment modalities after a distal radius fracture. I was able to pool the rates of the 5 different rates using R. Now I have to compare the pooled rates of the 4 treatment modalities with the golden standard separately. I though the chi squared test would be the best method. How do