search for: arrowdodg

On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:30 AM, arrowdodger wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: > LLVMC has been removed. I'm still working on removing the llvm-gcc dependencies out of the configure scripts. > > -eric > > > BTW, should this be mentioned in release no...

...ame > of structure and of it's instance at the same time. But it called implicitly > when the instance above is being instantiated. > As I mentioned before I already tried to include this header with no > success. I work in Linux, so it's really strange. > > > 2011/9/2 arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Semion Prihodko <semion.ababo at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> Hi, guys. >>> >>> Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project ( >>> https://github.com/ababo/AntOS). Cannot inst...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: >> Or to say it with other words: patches welcome. > > So, how should i proceed? Make CMake-generated config to be identical to > autotools one? That would be a good thing. Please note that some checks are a bit tricky. A function that on pl...

Okay, i've started slowly working. Who can i send patches for review, when they will be ready? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110106/88a7e893/attachment.html>

On Sep 21, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Jim Grosbach wrote: > On Sep 21, 2011, at 4:30 AM, arrowdodger wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at apple.com> wrote: >> LLVMC has been removed. I'm still working on removing the llvm-gcc dependencies out of the configure scripts. >> >> -eric >> >> >> BTW, shoul...

> > We may just not use those functions anymore - do you have a list of these? > Yes, i've started to make up a list of those functions, but it haven't finished yet. > This is more concerning - maybe it's a windows specific problem that came > along? > Not sure, i haven't look yet for CMake checking code itself. By the way, i'm using FreeBSD. Or to say it

Hello. I see many discrepancies in config.h file generated by CMake and autoheader. Most of them are following: In autofoo-generated config: > /* Define to 1 if you have the `<name>' function. */ > #define HAVE_<name> 1 > but in CMake-generated: > #undef HAVE_<name> > This happens because in config.h.cmake (config.h.in analog) these functions just are not

...ucture and of it's instance at the same time. But it called >> implicitly when the instance above is being instantiated. >> As  I mentioned before I already tried to include this header with no >> success. I work in Linux, so it's really strange. >> >> 2011/9/2 arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> >>> >>> On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Semion Prihodko <semion.ababo at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, guys. >>>> Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project >>>> (https://githu...

Hi, guys. Have a strange problem with LLVM in my project ( https://github.com/ababo/AntOS). Cannot instantiate JIT execution engine (NULL returns; message: Interpreter has not been linked in.). As you can see from the code I call InitializeNativeTarget. Also I tried to directly include the "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h" header, but with no success. I link with `llvm-config --ldflags

Whoops, phone rang and I forgot to cc to the list before I typed the message. ----- Forwarded Message ---- > From: Samuel Crow <samuraileumas at yahoo.com> > To: Ruben Van Boxem <vanboxem.ruben at gmail.com> > Sent: Wed, January 5, 2011 3:38:21 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] include/Config/config.h discrepancies between CMake and >autofoo builds > > > >

On Jan 4, 2011, at 7:45 AM, arrowdodger wrote: > Hello. I see many discrepancies in config.h file generated by CMake and autoheader. > > Most of them are following: > In autofoo-generated config: > /* Define to 1 if you have the `<name>' function. */ > #define HAVE_<name> 1 > but in CMake-generate...

Hello all, I wanna build a static linked executable using llvm. But I failed. My question is Can we use -static using llvm? Thanks for any response. Below is details ======== First I use $ clang++ test.cc `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs` I works as usual. But if I use $ clang++ test.cc `llvm-config --cxxflags --ldflags --libs` -static It yells lots of undefined reference, like

You are missing references for pthread. Try to add -pthread to build line. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20110108/90c573ca/attachment.html>

[cc-ing llvm-dev] arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > Hello. I've found that CMake-generated llvm-config contains -pedantic flag, > if LLVM_ENABLE_PEDANTIC was ON during cmake configuration. > This forces all llvm-config clients to build their sources with -pedantic, > which, i think, is kind...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Óscar Fuentes <ofv at wanadoo.es> wrote: > >> How do they build their frontend? >> > They are running llvm-config. And it gives -pedantic, if it was generated by > CMake build. If i build LLVM...

arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: >> Here is output of llvm-config built by CMake: > >> ~/.local/llvm/bin/llvm-config --cflags >> -I/usr/home/arr/.local/llvm/include -O3 -DNDEBUG -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS >> -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwr...

On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 19, 2011, at 8:05 PM, Yuri wrote: > > > On 02/19/2011 14:52, Yuri wrote: > >> Will MC path for JNI be included in 2.9? > >> > > > > Sorry. I meant: Will MC path for JIT be included in 2.9? > > While it would be nice, it doesn't seem like anyone is

[CCing llvm-dev] arrowdodger <6yearold at gmail.com> writes: > Hello. Suppose i'm writing a tool, which uses LLVM and i want it to be > buildable like clang - from tools/ subdir or standalone build. Since i'm not > very experinced with CMake, i've took your code from clang and tried to > adapt...

Hello. When i run llvm-config --libs jit bitreader bitwriter ipo linker engine i get: -lLLVMX86Disassembler -lLLVMX86AsmParser -lLLVMX86CodeGen -lLLVMSelectionDAG -lLLVMAsmPrinter -lLLVMMCParser -lLLVMX86AsmPrinter -lLLVMX86Utils -lLLVMX86Info -lLLVMLinker -lLLVMArchive -lLLVMipo -lLLVMBitWriter -lLLVMBitReader -lLLVMJIT -lLLVMExecutionEngine -lLLVMCodeGen -lLLVMScalarOpts -lLLVMInstCombine

Hello. I've built and `make chech-all` rc3 tarballs using CMake build on FreeBSD 8-STABLE system. Here are results: Failing Tests (10): Clang :: Index/crash-recovery-code-complete.c Clang :: Index/crash-recovery-reparse.c Clang :: Index/crash-recovery.c LLVM :: BugPoint/crash-narrowfunctiontest.ll LLVM :: BugPoint/metadata.ll LLVM :: BugPoint/remove_arguments_test.ll