search for: arrayidx98

...coming from this code in llvm::MachineBasicBlock::computeRegisterLiveness 1163 MachineOperandIteratorBase::PhysRegInfo Analysis = 1164 ConstMIOperands(I).analyzePhysReg(Reg, TRI); The instruction I being analyzed is: %BX<def> = MOV16rm %EDI, 2, %ECX, 0, %noreg; mem:LD2[%arrayidx98](tbaa=!18) and the Reg being passed in is 21, which is EBX. The result I get back for is: Analysis: {Clobbers = true, Defines = true, Reads = false, ReadsOverlap = false, DefinesDead = false, Kills = false} It seems based on the comment in the definition of PhysRegInfo.Defines, that Defines s...

...k::computeRegisterLiveness >> 1163 MachineOperandIteratorBase::PhysRegInfo Analysis = >> 1164 ConstMIOperands(I).analyzePhysReg(Reg, TRI); >> >> The instruction I being analyzed is: >> %BX<def> = MOV16rm %EDI, 2, %ECX, 0, %noreg; >mem:LD2[%arrayidx98](tbaa=!18) >> >> and the Reg being passed in is 21, which is EBX. The result I get back for >is: >> >> Analysis: {Clobbers = true, Defines = true, Reads = false, ReadsOverlap = >false, >> DefinesDead = false, Kills = false} >> >> It seems based on t...

...MachineOperandIteratorBase::PhysRegInfo Analysis = >>>> 1164 ConstMIOperands(I).analyzePhysReg(Reg, TRI); >>>> >>>> The instruction I being analyzed is: >>>> %BX<def> = MOV16rm %EDI, 2, %ECX, 0, %noreg; >>> mem:LD2[%arrayidx98](tbaa=!18) >>>> >>>> and the Reg being passed in is 21, which is EBX. The result I get back for >>> is: >>>> >>>> Analysis: {Clobbers = true, Defines = true, Reads = false, ReadsOverlap = >>> false, >>>> DefinesDead =...

...ness >> >> 1163 MachineOperandIteratorBase::PhysRegInfo Analysis = >> 1164 ConstMIOperands(I).analyzePhysReg(Reg, TRI); >> >> The instruction I being analyzed is: >> %BX<def> = MOV16rm %EDI, 2, %ECX, 0, %noreg; >> >> mem:LD2[%arrayidx98](tbaa=!18) >> >> >> and the Reg being passed in is 21, which is EBX. The result I get back for >> >> is: >> >> >> Analysis: {Clobbers = true, Defines = true, Reads = false, ReadsOverlap = >> >> false, >> >> DefinesDead = false...