Displaying 20 results from an estimated 22 matches for "arrari".
Did you mean:
arrary
2019 Nov 10
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
> I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
> nice improvement in behavior. While Herve's point is valid
> and I understand his frustration, I think staying within
> the matrix vs c(matrix, array) space is the right scope
> for this work in
2019 Nov 12
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
<polite mode>
> x %inherits% "data.frame"
IMHO, I think that user-defined binary operators are being over-used
within the R community.
I don't think that they're "cute" or stylish.
I think their use should be limited to cases, where they significantly
increase the readability of the code.
However, readability, is a (partly) subjective topic...
2019 Nov 12
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
On 11/12/19 12:21, Abby Spurdle wrote:
> <polite mode>
>
>> x %inherits% "data.frame"
>
> IMHO, I think that user-defined binary operators are being over-used
> within the R community.
>
> I don't think that they're "cute" or stylish.
> I think their use should be limited to cases, where they significantly
> increase the
2019 Nov 12
1
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
> You can have your own rant about "user-defined binary operators being
> over-used within the R community" without suggesting that my rant was
> rude.
I wasn't suggesting that you were rude.
I was questioning a trend.
2010 Sep 27
2
store matrix in an arrary
Dear All
I want to store matrix in an array
Suppose s<-array(0,4)
for(i in 1:4)
s[i] <- read_matrix(a,2,2)
But the error - number of items to replace is not a multiple of replacement
length.
Can you suggest me any alternative method for storing a matrix in an array.
Thanks In advance.
Kind Regards
Wesley C Mathew
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
2019 Nov 10
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
On 10/11/2019 9:17 a.m., Bryan Hanson wrote:
>
>
>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
>>
>>> I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
>>> nice improvement in
2019 Nov 14
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
On 11/14/19 05:47, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 2:37 AM Martin Maechler
> <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
>>
>> > I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
>> > nice improvement in
2019 Nov 25
1
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") -- and S3 dispatch
On 21 November 2019 at 17:57, Martin Maechler wrote:
| (if you use a version of R-devel, with svn rev >= 77446; which
| you may get as a binary for Windows in about one day; everyone
| else needs to compile for the sources .. or wait a bit, maybe
| also not much longer than one day, for a docker image) :
FYI: rocker/drd [1] and rocker/r-devel both have rev 77455 now (as they are
both on
2019 Nov 15
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
> > And indeed I think you are right on spot and this would mean
> > that indeed the implicit class
> > "matrix" should rather become c("matrix", "array").
>
> I've made up my mind (and not been contradicted by my fellow R
> corers) to try go there for R 4.0.0 next April.
I'm not enthusiastic about matrices extending arrays.
If a
2019 Nov 12
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
On 11/11/19 01:40, Martin Maechler wrote:
>>>>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>>>>> on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:48:26 -0500 writes:
>
> > On 10/11/2019 9:17 a.m., Bryan Hanson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
> >>>
>
2019 Nov 21
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") -- and S3 dispatch
TLDR: This is quite technical, still somewhat important:
1) R 4.0.0 will become a bit more coherent: a matrix is an array
2) Your package (or one you use) may be affected.
>>>>> Martin Maechler
>>>>> on Fri, 15 Nov 2019 17:31:15 +0100 writes:
>>>>> Pages, Herve
>>>>> on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:13:47 +0000 writes:
2019 Nov 11
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
>>>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>>>> on Sun, 10 Nov 2019 11:48:26 -0500 writes:
> On 10/11/2019 9:17 a.m., Bryan Hanson wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
2019 Nov 10
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
> On Nov 10, 2019, at 3:36 AM, Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
>
>> I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
>> nice improvement in behavior. While Herve's point is valid
>> and I understand his frustration,
2020 Jan 28
0
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") -- and S3 dispatch
>>>>> Pages, Herve
>>>>> on Tue, 21 Jan 2020 17:33:01 +0000 writes:
> Dear Martin,
> What's the ETA for _R_CLASS_MATRIX_ARRAY_=TRUE to become the new
> unconditional behavior in R devel? Thanks!
> H.
Thank you, Herv?, for asking / reminding.
It has been made so now, 3 days ago (svn r77714).
Martin
> On 11/21/19
2019 Nov 14
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 2:37 AM Martin Maechler
<maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>
> >>>>> Gabriel Becker
> >>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019 12:37:08 -0700 writes:
>
> > I agree that we can be careful and narrow and still see a
> > nice improvement in behavior. While Herve's point is valid
> > and I understand his
2006 Feb 17
2
creating 3-way tables for mantelhaen.test
Hi R users
I have serveral binary variables (e.g., X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X,6, and X7) and
one continuous variable (e.g., Y1).
I combined these variables using data.frame()
mydata <- data.frame(X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,Y1)
after that, I sorted this data.frame
rank.by.Y1<-order(mydata[,8])
sorted.mydata<-mydata[rank.by.Y1,]
after that, I replaced Y1's values with values ranging from 1
2019 Nov 15
5
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") [was "head.matrix ..."]
>>>>> Pages, Herve
>>>>> on Thu, 14 Nov 2019 19:13:47 +0000 writes:
> On 11/14/19 05:47, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 2:37 AM Martin Maechler
>> <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Gabriel Becker
>>>>>>>> on Sat, 2 Nov 2019
2020 Jan 21
2
class(<matrix>) |--> c("matrix", "arrary") -- and S3 dispatch
Dear Martin,
What's the ETA for _R_CLASS_MATRIX_ARRAY_=TRUE to become the new
unconditional behavior in R devel? Thanks!
H.
On 11/21/19 08:57, Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> TLDR: This is quite technical, still somewhat important:
> 1) R 4.0.0 will become a bit more coherent: a matrix is an array
> 2) Your package (or one you use) may be affected.
>
>
2011 May 18
0
XLSM Question
Hi,
I would like to ask you how to read an arrary from an *.xlsm file? I have tried different packages such as xlsReadWrite and RODBC. Everything is performed on the final versions of addons and R.
Additionally, when I tried the RODBC received the following error:
> library(RODBC)
> con = odbcConnectExcel("C:\\Temp.xlsm")
Warning messages:
1: In odbcDriverConnect(con,
2008 Feb 27
4
proliant ml370
hi all,
i just inherit a server:
Compaq ProLiant ML370 Generation 2 Server with Smart Array 5300
Controller with 6x18.2GB hard drives.
i want to install centos 5 on it with hardware raid 1. any idea how? it
also has a build-in and add-on ethernet cards. how do i know which one is
which to assign ip?
thanks.
t. hiep