search for: arphaman

On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > >> Hi everyone! >> >> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a >> report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in >> July: >> >&...

...yet it is an enormous task. Usually, the Fortran routines are used externally in other computation and I/O is done through other and more efficient layers. I hope your proposal will be accepted and I'm looking forward to seeing the result of your work. Cheers, Matthieu 2013/4/24 Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> > Hi again. > > I've though more about the full standard being too ambitious, and now I > fully agree with that. So I had a go at choosing the useful subset of > Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be viewed > at https://gist.git...

...into account during the development. I will take a look on how clang and various tools for it operate. 2013/4/22 Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dmitri Gribenko" <gribozavr at gmail.com> > > To: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:00:51 AM > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GSoC project questions. > > > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com>...

...g the useful subset of Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be viewed at https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 . Focusing on less should also improve my productivity and lead to a better summer of code project by drastically reducing the pressure :) 2013/4/22 Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> > Thanks for the responses! > > >> I might be wrong (I'd love to be wrong here!) but I think this is a bit >> too ambitious >> > You might be right about it being too ambitious, it would certainly be > wise to aim for less. A more polished, bu...

2013/4/24 Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> > You may want to check the later versions of the standard also to check if >> some of your proposal is not deprecated there. >> > I had a quick check with 2008 standard, and I'm pretty sure that all of > the stuff that I chose is there, although a lot of...

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > So I had a go at choosing the useful subset of > Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be viewed > at https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 . Are expression parsing and AST implemented? What about type representation? Dmitri -- main(i...

On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > >>Hi everyone! > >> > >>Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a > >>report describing what results I've achieved since my last > >>rep...

On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for your support. > I wrote my draft GSoC proposal, it can be viewed here - > https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 > Please read it and tell me what you think. Any criticisms or suggestions are > welcome! Hello Alex, > I plan to make flang a fully...

Hi everyone! Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html Thanks for this GSoC LLVM! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Matthieu Brucher" <matthieu.brucher at gmail.com> > To: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:55:44 PM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GSoC project questions. > > > > > > > > > 2013/4/24 Alex L < arphaman at gmail.com &gt...

On Sep 23, 2013, at 10:01 AM, C. Bergström <cbergstrom at pathscale.com> wrote: > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com <mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone! >>> >>> Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: >>> >>...

On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi everyone! > > Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a report describing what results I've achieved since my last report in July: > > http://flang-gsoc.blogspot.ie/2013/09/end-of-gsoc-report.html > > Thanks f...

...tory here: https://github.com/hyp/flang So far I've enjoyed working on flang, and I would like to apply to GSoC with it. I will start writing a proposal in the next couple of days. Should I send it to the mailing list first, or should I send it directly to GSoC? Thanks. 2013/4/13 Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> > No. I think that you might want to use Clang for inspiration on design, >> but you'd certainly not be bound to that. If you'd like to take a much more >> start-from-scratch approach, you can also look at the code that Bill put >> together: https://gi...

----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 12:01:46AM +0700, "C. Bergström" wrote: > > On 09/23/13 11:54 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > >On Sep 23, 2013, at 5:25 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com > > ><mailto:arphaman at gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > > >>Hi everyone! > > >> > > >>Today is the official "pencils down" day for GSoC and I wrote a > > >>report describing what results I've achieved...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dmitri Gribenko" <gribozavr at gmail.com> > To: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > Cc: "LLVM Developers Mailing List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Monday, April 22, 2013 9:00:51 AM > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] GSoC project questions. > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Thanks...

...utility functions. There was a lot of work for type representation as well, but there's still some stuff to do in that area, especially for records, arrays and various constraint checks. 2013/4/24 Dmitri Gribenko <gribozavr at gmail.com> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > So I had a go at choosing the useful subset of > > Fortran on which I would like to work on - my update proposal can be > viewed > > at https://gist.github.com/hyp/5434845 . > > Are expression parsing and AST implemented? What about type >...

On Apr 19, 2013, at 12:18 PM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> >> To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> >> Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing >> List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> &...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alex L" <arphaman at gmail.com> > To: "Hal Finkel" <hfinkel at anl.gov> > Cc: "Anton Korobeynikov" <anton at korobeynikov.info>, "Bill Wendling" <isanbard at gmail.com>, "LLVM Developers Mailing > List" <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > Sent: Fr...

...unusual YAML. Also, you're thinking of YAMLIO which is a layer on top of the YAML parser (YAMLParser.{h,cpp}). It might make sense to not use YAMLIO (it is good for some types of data, not for all) but still use the YAML parser. -- Sean Silva > On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> 2015-04-28 10:14 GMT-07:00 Quentin Colombet <qcolombet at apple.com>: >> >>> Hi Alex, >>> >>> Thanks for working on this. >>> >>> Personally I would rather not have to write YAML inputs...

...ttributes will be handled by the YAML parser automatically, and I might extend it to provide better/more specific error messages. And I think that it's possible to use the machine verifier to catch the other errors that you've mentioned. Alex > On Apr 28, 2015, at 9:56 AM, Alex L <arphaman at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > I would like to propose a text-based, human readable format that will be used to > > serialize the machine level IR. The major goal of this format is to allow LLVM > > to save the machine level IR after any code generation pass an...