Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1221 matches for "arnolds".
Did you mean:
arnold
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
Hi all,
building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm
(Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following
message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a
bug?
/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/
arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/
2007 Sep 19
2
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
I now get:
/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/
arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/
Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/
bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/
i686-apple-darwin8/lib/ -isystem /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
On Sep 19, 2007, at 3:22 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> Hi all,
> building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT(Revision: 42128) with current llvm
> (Revision: 42128) on 8.10.1 Darwin (x86) fails with the following
> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a
> bug?
I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.
>
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
I think the build should work now, could you try? You need both
llvm and llvm-gcc.
There are still codegen issues, but I don't think they'll affect code
that
doesn't use long double.
On Sep 19, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> Okay dokey, thanks :)
> On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency
2007 Sep 19
4
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
Okay dokey, thanks :)
On 19 Sep 2007, at 16:52, Dale Johannesen wrote:
>> message. Is that a just a temporary inconsistency or should i file a
>> bug?
>
> I think I broke this with long double. I'll get it fixed shortly.
1998 Aug 18
1
PAM authentication failure?
Howdy:
Can anybody explain why /var/log/messages is filled with the
following?
Aug 18 09:37:53 rama PAM_pwdb[28483]: 1 authentication failure;
(uid=0) -> arnold for samba service
Aug 18 09:38:25 rama PAM_pwdb[28494]: (login) session opened for
user arnold by arnold(uid=0)
The first one happens every time I browse to rama from win95
Explorer; the second one is from a telnet login
2019 Jul 10
1
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Your report is most appreciated, though it lacked quite a lot of detail
that could've expedited the investigation why it happened. With the
further information we can hopefully figure out why you are experiencing
the problems you reported. There is no offense intended.
Aki
On 10.7.2019 14.01, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote:
> Hello Timo,
>
> I have scheduled some time to carry
2007 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Building current llvm-gcc-4.0 TOT fails on darwin x86
On Sep 19, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer wrote:
> I now get:
> /Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/xgcc -B/Users/
> arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/gcc/ -B/Users/arnold/
> Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/i686-apple-darwin8/
> bin/ -B/Users/arnold/Desktop/testing/vanilla-gcc-4.0/obj/../install/
> i686-apple-darwin8/lib/
2019 Jun 27
2
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hello Aki,
Thank you greatly for your advice, it is really valuable to know that
the key criteria for our desired application of Dovecot are
supported (our groupware stacks are running Dovecot 2.3.4.1) prior to
commencing operations to configure Dovecot and migrate enterprise data.
Thanks for the word of caution with regards to mbox format; that was a
slip of the tongue on my part, our groupware
2019 Jul 04
9
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Hi all,
The guidance provided so far has been really helpful, and has helped a
great deal to bringing down wasted energy on finding and executing a
viable path. I am now at the final due action to complete our Dovecot
application to our use-case, but am stuck on an issue that I cannot
find any easily accessible documentation on.
Generally this is what has been done:
1. Uploaded the enterprise
2019 Jul 08
1
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
Hi!
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<div>
Thank you for reporting these. We will look into them. In the mean time, can you see if any of these are fixed in 2.3.6?
</div>
<div>
<br>
</div>
2019 Jul 10
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Hello Timo,
I have scheduled some time to carry through the test requested by Aki.
I will add responding to you as part of that process.
Not sure if I have said or done anything to offend you, as your tone
appears quite abrasive, even where you do not have an actual response
to an observation.
It is my view that it is a privilege to provide an open source
platform, and therefore a
2019 Jun 27
3
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive.
Am 27.06.2019 um 07:35 schrieb Aki Tuomi via dovecot:
>
> On 26.6.2019 22.12, Arnold Opio Oree via dovecot wrote:
>> Hello to you all,
>>
>> I'd like to ask about my intended application of Dovecot to create a folder-hierarchy for storing our enterprise emails, which are treated as live data?rather than archives for compliance or occasional / reactive retrieval.
2007 Aug 22
5
Slow concurrent actions on the same LVM logical volume
Hi 2 all !
I have problems with concurrent filesystem actions on a ocfs2
filesystem which is mounted by 2 nodes. OS=RH5ES and OCFS2=1.2.6
F.e.: If I have a LV called testlv which is mounted on /mnt on both
servers and I do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.a bs=1024
count=1000000" on server 1 and do at the same time a du -hs
/mnt/test.a it takes about 5 seconds for du -hs to execute:
270M
1999 Jul 26
2
SAMBA digest 2177
At 16:58 23/07/99 +1000, you wrote:
> SAMBA Digest 2177
>
>For information on unsubscribing see http://samba.org/listproc/
>Topics covered in this issue include:
>
> 1) rookie needs help
> by "Page, Jon T" <Jon.Page@pnl.gov>
> 2) genrand.c
> by Mark_Noel@cch.com
> 3) Wincenter 3.1.13/Winframe 1.7 - ACLs:
> by Hanns-Peter Ermert
2013 Sep 27
2
[LLVMdev] Trip count and Loop Vectorizer
On Sep 27, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer <aschwaighofer at apple.com> wrote:
> so you could infer that n must be smaller than 8 (because you know the range of the other dimension). The question is how often does such an example occur, where this is possible, to make such an effort justifiable?
smaller equal, of course ;)
2008 Apr 24
2
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
Another round :)
I'll post the patch to llvm-commits cause i guess people might get
annoyed by my series of patches :).
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:34 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> wrote:
.
>> +PPCTargetLowering::IsEligibleForTailCallOptimization(SDOperand Call,
>> ...
> That's fine. Please break it into two parts and move the target
> independent part
2008 Apr 24
0
[LLVMdev] RFC: PowerPC tail call optimization patch
The patch is in
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20080421/061548.html
.
Okay to commit :)
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer
<arnold.schwaighofer at gmail.com> wrote:
> Another round :)
>
> I'll post the patch to llvm-commits cause i guess people might get
> annoyed by my series of patches :).
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at
2019 Jul 07
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Dovecot Team,
I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical.
System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systems
Dovecot Version(s): 2.3.4.1
doveadm-sync -1/general
1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location
doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination
directories are the same
2) The -n / -N flags do not work,
2019 Jul 07
0
Applying Dovecot for a large / deep folder-hierarchy archive - BUG REPORTS!
Dovecot Team,
I'd like to report a number of bugs, that are to my view all critical.
System: Replicated on multiple Debian 10 (Buster) systemsDovecot
Version(s): 2.3.4.1
doveadm-sync -1/general
1) If DIRNAMEs are not different between command line and mail_location
doveadm sync will fail, saying that the source and destination
directories are the same
2) The -n / -N flags do not work, and a