search for: arning

Hi, I added the "tests" subdirectory and a test file (say "myTest.R") to our "systemfit" package. Up to now I create the "myTest.Rout.save" file with > R CMD BATCH --vanilla myTest.R myTest.Rout.save However, "R CMD check" reports two differences between myTest.Rout.save and the output of myTest.R: a) myTest.Rout.save contains following

Hello, I'd like to use DBI to store lm objects in a database. I've to analyze many of linear models and I cannot store them in a single R-session (not enough memory). Also it'd be nice to have them persistent. Maybe it's possible to create a compact binary representation of the object (the kind of format created created by "save"), so that one doesn't need to write

Hi, I'm using maxlik with functions specified (L, his gradient & hessian). Now I would like determine some robust standard errors of my estimators. So I 'm try to use vcovHC, or hccm or robcov for example but in use one of them with my result of maxlik, I've a the following error message : Erreur dans terms.default(object) : no terms component Is there some attributes

Hi Saurav! On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 6:06 PM, Pathak, Saurav<s.pathak08 at imperial.ac.uk> wrote: > I am new to R, I have to do a 2 step Heckman model, my selection equation is > below which I was successful in running but I am unable to proceed further, > > > > I have so far used the following command > > glm(formula = s ~ age + gender + gemedu + gemhinc + es_gdppc +

Might this be related to the Linux version? I'm testing on one of our university servers, and they tend to be deprived of regular updates sometimes... (Dirk, sorry for sending you this twice.) > Sys.info() sysname "Linux" release

Hi Dirk! It would be great if you could upload a (Debian) package "r-cran-matrix" that includes the latest version of the R package "Matrix" to http://cran.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/intrepid/ "r-recommended" depends on "r-cran-matrix", but only the (outdated) version that shipped with intrepid (0.999375-10-1) is currently available. Note:

Hi there. Is it possible to have different sip users have the same CallerId number in sip.conf. I need this because we got multiple companies on this Asterisk box. Company A's internal numbers: CID: User: 1000 - User 1 2000 - User 2 3000 - User 3 4000 - User 4 Company B's internal numbers: CID: User: 1000 - User 5 2000 - User 6 3000 - User 7 4000 - User 8 Is this allowed? Regards

We have finished a beta version of the feature. A webrev for it can be found here: http://cr.illumos.org/~webrev/sensille/fits-send/ It adds a command ''zfs fits-send''. The resulting streams can currently only be received on btrfs, but more receivers will follow. It would be great if anyone interested could give it some testing and/or review. If there are no objections,

Dear all I am happy that summary.default() no longer rounds since R 3.4.0. However, in R 3.4.0, in a few cases, print.summaryDefault() rounds the mean value (and the median value) differently on my GNU/Linux machine and on my colleague's MS-Windows machine. Here is a small (simplified) reproducible example: R> a <- 1234568.01 + c(0:1) R> summary(a) Output on MS-Windows (expected

Hi All, I''m using Shorewall 3.0.4 and I''m wondering if it is possible to do traffic shapping on only one interface from a bridge. The firewall has got 3 NIC, eth0, eth1, eth2. eth0 and eth2 are bridged, but if I''m right, when you specify a traffic rate for a link, you do it for the interface. In my case, eth0 and eth2 do not appear in the interface file, but it is

...our function "predict.systemfit" has more arguments. However, the function "predict.lm" has also more arguments and they are almost the same as in "predict.systemfit". Thus, I think that our way to specify "predict.systemfit" might be OK in spite of this warning. What should I do? Can I ignore this warning? What will Kurt answer when we submit it ;-) ? Best wishes, Arne -- Arne Henningsen Department of Agricultural Economics University of Kiel Olshausenstr. 40 D-24098 Kiel (Germany) Tel: +49-431-880 4445 Fax: +49-431-880 1397 ahenningsen at agric-econ...

Hello, I've a very long character array (>500k characters) that need to split by '\n' resulting in an array of about 60k numbers. The help on strsplit says to use perl=TRUE to get better formance, but still it takes several minutes to split this string. The massive string is the return value of a call to xmlElementsByTagName from the XML library and looks like this: ... 12345

Is there a package in R that handles general linear (in-)equality + box constrained optimization? If it is not there, could anyone advise me which way to go? And/or point me to packages that solve these problems partially? best, ingmar -- Ingmar Visser Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam Roetersstraat 15, 1018 WB Amsterdam The Netherlands http://users.fmg.uva.nl/ivisser/ tel:

Hi, I have a dataframe (say myData) and want to get a list (say myList) that contains a matrix for each row of the dataframe myData. These matrices are calculated based on the corresponding row of myData. Using a for()-loop to do this is very slow. Thus, I tried to use apply(). However, afaik apply() does only return a list if the matrices have different dimensions, while my matrices have

On Thu, 10 Jun 1999, Friedrich Leisch wrote: > Yes, if I understood AIX workings correct you have to have a text file > of to-be-exported symbols at the time of linking a shared library, > i.e. the linker is called like (this is pasted from a mail by Arne) > > $(F77) -o module.so -bM:SRE -bE:module.exp -bnoentry $(OBJECTS) $(LIBDIR) $(LIBS) > > where module.exp is a text

Hello, I've a data frame with 15 colums and 6000 rows, and I need the data in a single vector of size 90000 for ttest. Is there such a conversion function in R, or would I have to write my own loop over the colums? thanks for your help + kind regards Arne

Hi All, I've the following data frame with 54 rows and 4 colums: > x Ratio Dose Time Batch R.010mM.04h.NEW 0.02 010mM 04h NEW R.010mM.04h.NEW.1 0.07 010mM 04h NEW ... R.010mM.24h.NEW.2 0.06 010mM 24h NEW R.010mM.04h.OLD 0.19 010mM 04h OLD ... R.010mM.04h.OLD.1 0.49 010mM 04h OLD R.100mM.24h.OLD 0.40 100mM 24h OLD I'd

On 4/5/20 7:14 PM, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 05/04/2020 17:47, Arne Zachlod via samba wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm currently in the process of updating our Samba environment from >> 4.3 to 4.11. Looks like I did something wrong. Some pointers would be >> much appreciated. >> >> Since I wanted to migrate from Ubuntu to Debian anyway, I

Hello, I'm wondering what's the best way to analyse an unbalanced design with a low number of replicates. I'm not a statistician, and I'm looking for some direction for this problem. I've a 2 factor design: Factor batch with 3 levels, and factor dose within each batch with 5 levels. Dose level 1 in batch one is replicated 4 times, level 3 is replicated only 2 times. all

Hello, I've come across the following situation in R-1.8.1 (compile + running under RedHat 7.1): > phyper(24, 514, 5961-514, 53, lower.tail=T) [1] 1 > phyper(24, 514, 5961-514, 53, lower.tail=F) [1] -1.037310e-11 I'd expect the later to be 0 or some very small positive number. Is this a number under-flow of the calculation? Do you think I'm safe if I just set the result to 0