search for: arnamoy

Thanks for the reply. For the source code: int main() { int a = 0; int *p; p = &a; call_arnamoy(p); int *p1; p1 = p; return 1; } The bit code: %retval = alloca i32, align 4 %a = alloca i32, align 4 %p = alloca i32*, align 8 %p1 = alloca i32*, align 8 store i32 0, i32* %retval store i32 0, i32* %a, align 4 store i32* %a, i32** %p, align 8 %0 = load i32** %p, align 8 %call = call i32 @a...

...he source code downloaded from the website. Could you tell me what are the files that need to be modified to add a new token to parse my instruction from assembly text file (STEP 4) and add the grammar on how my instruction can be read and what it will construct as a result (STEP 5). Thanks; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 780-680-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120518/29f7d3ec/attachm...

...at I am doing wrong? Also what's the difference between declaring a pass as a struct vs declaring it as a class. In the "writing a pass" tutorial the "Hello" pass has been declared as a struct but most (if not all) the LLVM passes are written as classes. Thanks a lot; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120705/ff65500b/attachm...

....so in the llvm-src/Release+Asserts/lib directory) to solve the problem. Can anyone tell me what's the difference between writing a pass as a "struct" (as in the tutorial) and as a "class" (as most developers do)? Thanks again; ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Arnamoy Bhattacharyya <arnamoy at ualberta.ca> Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:34 AM Subject: "symbol lookup error" while running a Simple Loop Pass To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Hello; I wrote this simple loop pass to collect the number of instructions in each loop of the program. The code i...

...h "class" and then placing all members with "public:" visibility. From LLVM point of view, functionality of your pass is not going to change at all by using "class" or "struct" to define it. BR Carlos > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Arnamoy Bhattacharyya <arnamoy at ualberta.ca> > Date: Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 12:34 AM > Subject: "symbol lookup error" while running a Simple Loop Pass > To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu > > > Hello; > > I wrote this simple loop pass to collect the number of instructions in...

...ainst other instructions that use the same named pointer. But this is also not working because first the pointer is loaded into register and then the register is passed in the argument. Sorry if the question does not make sense. Any pointer or explanation will be appreciated. Thanks a lot!! -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073

Hi Arnamoy, > Any idea, why the output looks like - > Hello World > Hello World > val is 58 > > While the it should print 4 times? Both your loops are sharing the counter variable (%i1) without resetting it to 0 in between calls. I think that accounts for the behaviour. Cheers. Tim.

...ncomingValue(Idx, R); } for (auto& I : Replace) I->replaceUsesOfWith(V, R); } If this doesn't help, you could try showing us the actual IR you're running the transformation on. Just FMI, is it okay to post code on this mailing list? H. On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Arnamoy Bhattacharyya <arnamoy at ualberta.ca>wrote: > Hello all; > > So here is my goal: > > *** If there is a Call instruction to myFunction(int * val), I need to > identify all the instructions that uses val in the IR and replace the > uses with a newly created pointer. I wi...

...lvm::ArrayRef<llvm::Constant*>) Could anyone tell me how to give a value (lets say "hello world") to the Array Constant using currently available get method? Previously llvm::ConstantArray::get(getGlobalContext(), "hello world", true) should have worked. Thank you; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120905/1bfb4bec/attachm...

...nknown accesses Why do the " Pairwise dependence results:" and the "Statistics Collected" differ? Like first we get 11 "dependent"(must) accesses and later it says 11 "unknown" (may) accesses? Am I doing anything wrong or the code seems buggy? Thanks; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120620/2dc31fde/attachm...

...ow can I get the name of the bitcode file on which I am running the pass. I am making my pass as a loadable module. And if I run my pass like this - opt -S -loops -load /home/arnie/llvm-clang/llvm/Release+Asserts/lib/XYZ.so -xyz <b.bc> b1.bc I want to get b.bc in the pass. Thank you; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120906/5152ad42/attachm...

...r LLVM3.5 to LLVM10. There used to be a call instruction with the signature static CallInst * Create (Value *F, Value *Actual, const Twine &NameStr="", Instruction *InsertBefore=0) Can anyone please explain what it supposed to do? What was F and Actual? Thank you so much. -- Dr. Arnamoy Bhattacharyya R&D Compiler Engineer Huawei

...be just CallInst * Create (FunctionCallee Func, ArrayRef< Value *> Args...), where I push the "Actual" argument to the ArrayRef and then create the call? On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:15 AM Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 19 Nov 2020 at 14:24, Arnamoy Bhattacharyya via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > I am working on porting a tool written for LLVM3.5 to LLVM10. There > > used to be a call instruction with the signature > > static CallInst * Create (Value *F, Value *Actual, const Twine > > &amp...

...de/llvm/Instructions.h llvm/include/llvm/Support/InstVisitor.h llvm/lib/AsmParser/< necessary files> llvm/include/llvm/Bitcode/LLVMBitCodes.h llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp llvm/lib/VMCore/Instruction.cpp llvm/lib/VMCore/Instructions.cpp llvm/include/llvm-c/core.h Thank you; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 780-680-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120520/c12b74c3/attachm...

...i32, align 4 %i1 = alloca i32, align 4 store i32 0, i32* %retval store i32 2, i32* %num_iter, align 4 store i32 56, i32* %val, align 4 store i32 0, i32* %i1, align 4 br label %codeRepl codeRepl: ; preds = %entry call void @main_for.condarnamoy(i32* %i1, i32* %num_iter, i32* %val) call void @main_for.cond(i32* %i1, i32* %num_iter, i32* %val) br label %for.end for.end: ; preds = %codeRepl %0 = load i32* %val, align 4 %call3 = call i32 (i8*, ...)* @printf(i8* getelementptr inbounds ([11...

...39;. Stop. However, if I configure and build the whole LLVM again (with my pass), it is able to produce the shared library. Is it the only way to integrate my pass into LLVM? Because, every time I modify my pass, I have to rebuilt LLVM which takes close to half-an-hour to build? Thank you; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120704/f508dbe4/attachm...

...discussion went i the llvm mailing list about work on supporting OpenMP in Clang (llvm-gcc already supports that).( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-January/046640.html) I just want to know, anybody has made any progress in it? It would be really helpful for me. Thanks a lot; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120618/09c7fa0e/attachm...

> From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Arnamoy Bhattacharyya > Subject: [LLVMdev] Is Loop Dependence Analysis Printing Correct Stats? > for(i = 0; i < 4; i ++) > { > a[i] = a[i-1]+1; > } > Am I doing anything wrong or the code seems buggy? Your code is buggy. The first time through the loop, you're referencing a[-1...

...output: lli: hello.bc:1:1: error: expected top-level entity ELF@4( *clang:* clang -c hello.c -emit-llvm -o hello.bc lli hello.bc output: hello world hello.c: #include <stdio.h> int main() { printf("hello world\n"); return 0; } Any suggestions on how to do it in llvm-gcc? -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120616/75684e09/attachm...

...CI, load_count); BB->getInstList().insert((Instruction*)CI, call_print); }//end of if } return true; } }; } char bishe_insert::ID = 0; static RegisterPass<bishe_insert> X("bishe_insert", "insert print calls"); Thanks a lot; -- Arnamoy Bhattacharyya Athabasca Hall 143 Department of Computing Science - University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2E8 587-710-7073 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120822/b2095ec8/attachm...