Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "arminfo".
Did you mean:
arinfo
2010 Jul 26
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Dependency Graph
...=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
BitReader [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
AsmPrinter [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
AsmParser [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
Archive [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
Analysis [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
ARMInfo [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
ARMCodeGen [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
ARMAsmPrinter [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
ARMAsmParser [shape=box,style=filled,color=olivedrab1];
subgraph clusterARM { ARMAsmParser; ARMAsmPrinter; ARMInfo; ARMCodeGen; }
subgraph clust...
2013 Apr 09
0
[LLVMdev] Please document the layers
On Apr 8, 2013, at 2:55 PM, "Robinson, Paul" <Paul_Robinson at playstation.sony.com> wrote:
I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists.
> While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing,
> there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers.
> Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and
2013 Apr 08
2
[LLVMdev] Please document the layers
I keep seeing "this is a layering violation" comments on the lists.
While there are a few llvm.org pages that mention layers in passing,
there is nothing (that I've found) actually specifying the layers.
Trying to infer the layering from the code is tedious and error-prone
(or we wouldn't see so many violations in code reviews, eh?).
Now, I understand that Google has some sort