Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "armebv7".
Did you mean:
armeb
2016 Jan 05
2
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
On 5 January 2016 at 10:55, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:
> On 5 January 2016 at 10:28, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote:
>> That's rather a hack, given that the 'l' actually has semantic
>> meaning, but I suppose I could live with it.
>
> Not really.
I disagree. "armv7l" is created specifically by Linux
2016 Jan 05
6
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
...ARMv7A". The other strings map to ARMv7A because that's what they
> generally mean, in the wild, with regards to "architecture names". The
> hack is that the Driver/Triple/Tuple are using that to mean everything
> else.
Sure. In exactly the same way there's no "armebv7" in TargetParser.
There's principled(ish) parsing of the "eb" when deciding what the
triple actually means though.
>> What does RTLinux on an R-class CPU present itself as? My guess would
>> be "armv7l" too.
>
> Nope. GNU triples have a very specific...