search for: armchair

I really really do not like armchair lawyer discussions and this is just flamebait if I've ever seen it... --------------- #1 Is the submarine patent risk really that bad? (What's driving this) #2 Pragmatically have "you" even considered how to execute on this relicense plan? a. What if one of the copyright holders...

...any life experience. >> >> But you wont want to know anything of this, because, as I said, you >> know it all now :-D >> >> So, run along and do your homework, so that you do not get in trouble >> with your teachers. > It's the holidays. Get back to your armchair! > >> >> Rowland > To whomever moderates this list: OK, Who do I report this childish boor to ?? He needs to grow up, He is as bad as 'Steve' got to be at the end, so what are you going to do about him. Rowland

...ut you wont want to know anything of this, because, as I said, you >>>> know it all now :-D >>>> >>>> So, run along and do your homework, so that you do not get in >>>> trouble with your teachers. >>> It's the holidays. Get back to your armchair! >>> >>>> >>>> Rowland >>> >> >> To whomever moderates this list: >> >> OK, Who do I report this childish boor to ?? >> >> He needs to grow up, He is as bad as 'Steve' got to be at the end, so >> what are y...

On 05/04/15 16:11, buhorojo wrote: > On 05/04/15 17:03, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 05.04.2015 um 16:55 schrieb buhorojo: >>> We don't want best anything >> >> sad enough >> >>> We want what we have to work >> >> so do what you want - who cares >> >>> Linux: we configure it as we wish >> >> why

Is the Vorbis ACM codec still being maintained? Then I encode an avi with Vorbis audio, the sound gets out of sync after a while no matter what I try. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:45 AM, Alex Rosenberg <alexr at leftfield.org> wrote: > This it totally "armchair quarterbacking," but I am a little frustrated > that we've come to conflate flavors and targets. > > The original intent of flavors was to internally translate each flavor > into a neutral lld-native command line syntax. We now have baked in > assumptions of behavior based o...

...always great. I'd be very happy to collaborate on organizing such a BoF. Please let me know if any of you are interested in co-organizing such a BoF. Thanks! Kristof Op do 21 jun. 2018 om 17:19 schreef Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>: > I'm just an armchair critic with a lot of opinions on what other people > should do, and not enough willpower to pick one project and make it happen. > :) > > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:57 AM <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > >> So Reid, you'll be running a BoF on this at the October de...

...y "RHEL 5 Unleashed" by Tammy Fox, "The Definitive Guide to CentOS" by Peter Membrey, Tim Verhoeven and Ralph Angenendt and "Foundations of CentOS Linux" by Ryan Baclit. Can you suggest any good books about RHEL/CentOS 6.x and/or 7.x? I like being able to sit in an armchair when I do some RTFM. :o) Cheers from South France, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques 100% Linux et logiciels libres 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Web : http://www.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux.fr T?l. : 04 66 63 10 32

...cause I > hadn't had any life experience. > > But you wont want to know anything of this, because, as I said, you > know it all now :-D > > So, run along and do your homework, so that you do not get in trouble > with your teachers. It's the holidays. Get back to your armchair! > > Rowland

...;> >>> But you wont want to know anything of this, because, as I said, you >>> know it all now :-D >>> >>> So, run along and do your homework, so that you do not get in >>> trouble with your teachers. >> It's the holidays. Get back to your armchair! >> >>> >>> Rowland >> > > To whomever moderates this list: > > OK, Who do I report this childish boor to ?? > > He needs to grow up, He is as bad as 'Steve' got to be at the end, so > what are you going to do about him. > > Rowland...

...;> >>> But you wont want to know anything of this, because, as I said, you >>> know it all now :-D >>> >>> So, run along and do your homework, so that you do not get in >>> trouble with your teachers. >> It's the holidays. Get back to your armchair! >> >>> >>> Rowland >> > > To whomever moderates this list: > > OK, Who do I report this childish boor to ?? > > He needs to grow up, He is as bad as 'Steve' got to be at the end, so > what are you going to do about him. > > Rowland...

Hi, I installed a 2.4.18 kernel, with ext3 support and make a tune2fs -j /dev/sdxxx with all partitions, now I want to run a 2.2.20 kernel, I want to know if I can use the patch for 2.2.20 series (0.0.7a) without problems with my new ext3 partitions, or I must mount it as ext2 from 2.2.20, greetings and reply to admin@cideweb.com, I'm not subscribed to the list.

I will follow up with you offlist. -Chris > On Apr 29, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > >> On April 29, 2017 12:46:35 PM EDT, Chris Lattner <clattner at llvm.org> wrote: >> >>> On Apr 29, 2017, at 8:03 AM, Rafael Avila de Espindola via llvm-dev >> <llvm-dev at

On 10/7/2014 4:10 PM, Nick Kledzik wrote: > Shankar, > > Can you give provide a scenario where you want this? I’m not sure what you want here. a) LLVM could be built just for one target(LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD) b) With LTO this case might happen more often, where an user would have compiled LLVM just for one architecture and lld would support other architectures that LLVM would not

So Reid, you'll be running a BoF on this at the October dev meeting? ☺ --paulr From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2018 6:12 PM To: JVApen at gmail.com Cc: llvm-dev Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Bug-closing protocol Thanks for taking the time to report bugs! I think you are responsible for filing the most

On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 12:15 AM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Sanjoy Das > <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Daniel, >> >> On Fri, Dec 30, 2016 at 10:55 PM, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin.org> >> wrote: >> >> Right, but we are talking about

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2655 Bug ID: 2655 Summary: AuthorizedKeysCommand with large output can deadlock Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: 7.2p2 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: sshd Assignee: unassigned-bugs at

...taking a step back and looking at the > bigger picture now anyway, this could be an opportune moment to fix > the underlying issue with regards to undef. > > Having said that, since you're doing the work I'm more than happy to > let you make the call on this one. I have the armchair, but you have > the keyboard. :) > Your comments are of course very welcome (that goes without saying). Are you happy with me experimenting with something similar to what Danny proposed (a pre-solver computing the SCCs on the SSA graph?). At this point this is my favourite solution because w...

Rails instances themselves are almost always single-threaded, whereas Mongrel, and it''s acceptor, are multithreaded. In a situation with long-running Rails pages this presents a problem for mod_proxy_balancer. If num_processors is greater than 1 ( default: 950 ), then Mongrel will gladly accept incoming requests and queue them if its rails instance is currently busy. So even

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19356 Summary: DPMS does not turn off LCD backlight on NV34M [GeForce FX Go5200] Product: xorg Version: unspecified Platform: PowerPC OS/Version: Linux (All) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau