Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "arm_arch".
2016 Jan 07
2
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
...ve already made that change, and it would be included in any revised diff that I send out.
Thanks,
- Will
> On Jan 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Artyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com> wrote:
>
> William, what revision of LLVM is your patch based on?
>
> The trunk hasn't had ARM_ARCH("armv6hl") since r252903 (Nov 12th)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Dillon [mailto:william at housedillon.com]
> Sent: 06 January 2016 17:55
> To: Renato Golin
> Cc: Tim Northover; LLVM Dev; nd; Artyom Skrobov; Daniel Sanders; Eric Christopher
>...
2016 Jan 06
2
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
Taking the suggestions of the group under consideration, I’ve generated a new diff. The thing to note is that armv6l is now treated identically to armv6hl. I’ve also added a unit test.
This seems to me to be the least invasive method, and holds to existing conventions as closely as possible.
Thoughts?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name:
2016 Jan 08
2
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
...;>
>>>> On Jan 6, 2016, at 10:02 AM, Artyom Skrobov <Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com <mailto:Artyom.Skrobov at arm.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> William, what revision of LLVM is your patch based on?
>>>>
>>>> The trunk hasn't had ARM_ARCH("armv6hl") since r252903 (Nov 12th)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: William Dillon [mailto:william at housedillon.com <mailto:william at housedillon.com>]
>>>> Sent: 06 January 2016 17:55
>>>...
2016 Jan 05
6
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
> You assume triples make sense. That's the first mistake everyone does
> when thinking about triples. :)
I know they don't make sense in many corner cases, but I think
discarding logic where it *does* exist is a mistake.
> AFAIK, "ARMv7B" is only used by HighBank, which is no more. But that,
> too, was "ARMv7A big endian".
I believe it's what any
2016 Jan 04
4
Diff to add ARMv6L to Target parser
>> Going back through SVN history, I cannot find any evidence that ARMv6L ever existed.
>
> Oh, my bad!! I was thinking of ARMv7l... :/
>
> Nevertheless, I'll leave you guys to review this one, as I lost touch with the parser a while ago.
Ah, I see: ARMv7L is now an alias for ARMv7A.
So, if William has to add support for ARMv6L, I'd suggest he adds it as an alias, and