search for: arm_aapcs_vfpcc

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "arm_aapcs_vfpcc".

2016 Dec 14
2
llvm.trap() from -O1 optimization
...through `opt' with the -O1 flag, replaces the call to foo() with a call to llvm.trap() followed by an `unreachable' instruction. ===================== target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64" target triple = "armv7-unknown-linux-gnu" define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @foo() { entry: ret void } define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @bar() { entry: call void @foo() ret void } ===================== If I drop the "arm_aapcs_vfpcc" for foo(), then the `unreachable' instruction and the call to trap() are no longer introduced in the code. I am...
2015 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...y be blank otherwise. * Item 9 - undocumented calling conventions The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in the language references as of revision 223189: intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc, kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc, msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func, x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc Lastly I'd just like to thank the LLVM developers for all the time and hard work they've put into this project. I'd especially like to thank you for providing a language specif...
2015 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...t;> >>> The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in >>> the language references as of revision 223189: >>> >>> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc, >>> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc, >>> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func, >>> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc >>> >>> >>> This is just bitrot. >> >> -- Sean Silva >> >> >> >>> >>> Lastly I'd just lik...
2015 Jan 28
4
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...lling conventions >> >> The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in >> the language references as of revision 223189: >> >> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc, >> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc, >> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func, >> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc >> >> > This is just bitrot. > > -- Sean Silva > > >> >> >> Lastly I'd just like to thank the LLVM developers for all the time a...
2014 Jun 23
4
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com> wrote: > >> Hi Saleem, >> >> Though a simple app works great I am facing few issues trying to link a >> slightly complex object file, generated via LLVM, with some libs generated >> via
2015 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the language references as of revision 223189: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc, >>>>>>> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc, >>>>>>> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func, >>>>>>> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is just bitrot. >>>>>>&g...