Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "arm_aapcs_vfpcc".
2016 Dec 14
2
llvm.trap() from -O1 optimization
...through `opt' with the -O1
flag, replaces the call to foo() with a call to llvm.trap() followed
by an `unreachable' instruction.
=====================
target datalayout = "e-m:e-p:32:32-i64:64-v128:64:128-a:0:32-n32-S64"
target triple = "armv7-unknown-linux-gnu"
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @foo() {
entry:
ret void
}
define arm_aapcs_vfpcc void @bar() {
entry:
call void @foo()
ret void
}
=====================
If I drop the "arm_aapcs_vfpcc" for foo(), then the `unreachable'
instruction and the call to trap() are no longer introduced in the
code.
I am...
2015 Jan 28
3
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...y be
blank otherwise.
* Item 9 - undocumented calling conventions
The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in
the language references as of revision 223189:
intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc,
kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc,
msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func,
x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc
Lastly I'd just like to thank the LLVM developers for all the time and
hard work they've put into this project. I'd especially like to thank
you for providing a language specif...
2015 Jan 28
0
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...t;>
>>> The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in
>>> the language references as of revision 223189:
>>>
>>> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc,
>>> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc,
>>> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func,
>>> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc
>>>
>>>
>>> This is just bitrot.
>>
>> -- Sean Silva
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Lastly I'd just lik...
2015 Jan 28
4
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...lling conventions
>>
>> The following calling conventions are valid tokens but not described in
>> the language references as of revision 223189:
>>
>> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc,
>> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc,
>> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func,
>> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc
>>
>>
> This is just bitrot.
>
> -- Sean Silva
>
>
>>
>>
>> Lastly I'd just like to thank the LLVM developers for all the time a...
2014 Jun 23
4
[LLVMdev] Support for Windows Phone 8.1
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool <compnerd at compnerd.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:09 AM, Damanjit Singh <dsingh at adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Saleem,
>>
>> Though a simple app works great I am facing few issues trying to link a
>> slightly complex object file, generated via LLVM, with some libs generated
>> via
2015 Feb 02
2
[LLVMdev] Inconsistencies or intended behaviour of LLVM IR?
...>>>>>> in
>>>>>>> the language references as of revision 223189:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> intel_ocl_bicc, x86_stdcallcc, x86_fastcallcc, x86_thiscallcc,
>>>>>>> kw_x86_vectorcallcc, arm_apcscc, arm_aapcscc, arm_aapcs_vfpcc,
>>>>>>> msp430_intrcc, ptx_kernel, ptx_device, spir_kernel, spir_func,
>>>>>>> x86_64_sysvcc, x86_64_win64cc, kw_ghccc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is just bitrot.
>>>>>>&g...