search for: arm9e

Hello, I?m using the Linux Bridge on an Atmel Arm9 Plattform with the kernel 2.6.11rc3. The configuration is the following: LAN<--Arm9(Ethernet)--Bridge--Arm9(USB-Device)-->Notebook (USB-Host) or LAN<--Arm9(Ethernet)--Bridge--Arm9(USB-Host)-->Notebook (USB-Host) (with a Trust USB2.0 Host to Host cable) When I try to ping my Notebook from LAN and reverse, everything seems to be

ACE issued following PR: http://www.ace.nl/news/aces-cosy-compiler-framework-outperforms-llvm-arm9-processor Weird that they don't give any number and use ARM 9, do they mean cortex-a9 ?

Hi llandre, I think it's worth trying the float version on your CPU. However, I wouldn't be surprised if the fixed-point was still faster than float. BTW, you can use --enable-arm5-asm instead of --enable-arm4-asm. While both are currently almost the same, eventually it would be possible to get better performance using the ARM5E DSP-like instructions. Jean-Marc > This processor

Hi Jean-Marc, >I think it's worth trying the float version on your CPU. However, I >wouldn't be surprised if the fixed-point was still faster than float. ok, I'll try both configurations. >BTW, you can use --enable-arm5-asm instead of --enable-arm4-asm. While >both are currently almost the same, eventually it would be possible to >get better performance using the

On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:00:01 +0100, <speex-dev-request at xiph.org> wrote: > Thank you for your product Speex. We want to use it in > microcontroller AT91SAM7S256 (48 MHz). I'd strongly advice to use a higher performance micro. Let's consider that you'd succeed in getting it working right after optimizations. The time you want to add other speex features or other

Hi there, I've just started to work with the great speex encoder on ARM9-based embedded platform. This is my configuration: CPU: Cirrus Logic EP9315 @ 200 MHz (ARM920T) o.s.: Linux 2.6.9-rc2-ep93xx GCC: gcc version 3.3.3 (DENX ELDK 3.1 3.3.3-10) without MaverickCrunch support ogg library: 1.0 speex command line configuration: ./configure --enable-fixed-point --enable-arm4-asm The code is

Hello, I would like to run nut 2.6.1 on an embeeded machine ( arm9 ) running linux and uclibc. A working gcc tool chain came with the board. How can I compile and build nut using the cross compiler tool chain ? I know that this is not a very specific question. I have however little experience with cross compiling, and I wonder where to start. A logical point would be the configure script. It

Hi; I meet some problem when porting openssh.Please help me The following content is wrong info: # strace ssh execve("/usr/bin/ssh", ["ssh"], [/* 16 vars */]) = 0 mmap2(NULL, 20, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x40005000 stat("/etc/ld.so.cache", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=1796, ...}) = 0 open("/etc/ld.so.cache",

hi, i have searched through the archives but did not manage to find benchmarks of encoding/decoding speex on ARM processor. esp interested in ARM9E. understand that ARM5E has some dsp-like instructions, wonder whether they are compatible with those in ARM9E. thanks in advance. tk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/speex-dev/attachments/20051015/3fb7b018/attachment.h...

Hi, I have read the decoding side performance on ARM7 or ARM9. Your comment is very useful for us on evaluating the possible usage of Speex on our ARM system. How about the encoding performance? In your article, you mentioned "optimization". What is it? Is it included the 1.1.6 release source codes? thanks, Jay -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Well, all ARM9E cores use the v5TE architecture, which means Thumb and DSP-friendly instructions. Ettore Benedetti THALES COMMUNICATIONS B.V. Bestevaer 46, 1271 ZA Huizen The Netherlands Unclassified >>> tk <tunkeat@gmail.com> 10/15/05 7:15:20 AM >>> hi, i have searched through the...

Hi, 1 I got message "The specified network name is no longer = available" show on PC/Win2000 when copy large files to ARM9 base = NAS(with SAMBA 2.2.8 + Linux Kennel 2.4.18) file size is correct but content appended with all "0" in = ARM9 NAS HDD. 2. At the console of ARM9 NAS show : ..... root@sword:/var# . smbd[170]: PAM

I was trying to using llvm to targeting ARMv5TE -- 此致 礼 罗勇刚 Yours sincerely, Yonggang Luo -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180314/b9dadc37/attachment.html>

Hi, I have one question: Will Speex run in realtime (both encode / decode probably simulateusly) on Nokia 6600 --- basicaly ARM9 104MHz with Symbian 7s after porting to its C++ or Java? I am thinking mostly about the worst quality encoding (optionally duplex). Can this processor make it? Oh 6600 has something about 6mb memory if I remember good. Plase cc kangur@polcom.net in replies.

Good day, I have looked around for this information, but I have not been able to gain a clear understanding: what is the status of the LLVM ARM backend? That is, do the following work: 1. Generating Thumb code: I saw a video online where they describe an issue with using the ARM Thumb back-end 2. Generating code for ARM9 (ARMv5?) or ARM7 (ARMv4): again, the same presentation

Evan, > I'm the code owner of LLVM codegen and targets. I'm also the one of main developers on the original ARM target. That means, I would make the decisions on major development on ARM target if there are decisions to be made. > > But my role is very different from what people are looking for in this thread. To properly qualify a target like ARM which are supported on many

I haven't tried using -Os/z on any ARM device for the last 3 years, and back then, -Os would break many things. People normally care about code size on Cortex-R/M and ARM9 or older, and in there, not many LLVM users. --renato On 27 February 2013 00:38, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > I've not run any on non-iOS devices, and haven't looked at GCC since >

Hello all, I'm a hardware person who has recently found himself thrust into a software role. So, please forgive any ignorance in the following questions. I've tried to do my homework reading the relevant manual pages and investigating the Doxygen documentation. :-) We're investigating acoustic echo cancellation solutions for a speech application. Our hardware will be a TI C64x+

On 22 June 2011 11:49, Damjan Marion <damjan.marion at gmail.com> wrote: > # /opt/llvm/bin/clang -S -ccc-host-triple arm-unknown-freebsd -mcpu=arm926ej-s -mfloat-abi=soft -v -o rrx.S rrx.c Even though you specified cpu as arm9, it's probably generating generic ARM IR (use -emit-llvm -S and see), which defaults to ARM instructions. If you want thumb, use triple =

On Jul 27, 2012, at 9:36 AM, Sebastien DELDON-GNB wrote: > ACE issued following PR: > http://www.ace.nl/news/aces-cosy-compiler-framework-outperforms-llvm-arm9-processor > Weird that they don't give any number and use ARM 9, do they mean cortex-a9 ? It's impossible to say. This sort of marketing statement is impossible to refute, because there are no details. Who knows whether