search for: arithmetics

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

I am trying to compile R-2.4.1 in 64-bit on Solaris 10 running on AMD hardware. I am trying to do this with Sun Studio 11. My config.site looks like this: #! /bin/sh AR="/usr/ccs/bin/ar" TEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/tex" LATEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/latex" PDFTEX="/usr/local/teTeX/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.10/pdftex"

Full_Name: Brendan McMahon Version: 1.3 OS: SunOS Submission from: (NULL) (12.42.50.51) Probably just a configuration problem but ... fails to compile. configure completed without a problem. Any help appreciated!! SunOS flexdev1 5.7 Generic_106541-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 `Makedeps' is up to date. gcc -I. -I../../src/include -I../../src/include -I/usr/local/include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H

Guys, I'm having some problems trying to compile Samba-2.2.7a --with-pam. The ./configure works fine but the compile fails. I have no problems --without-pam. Any help would be greately appreciated. Linux SuSE SLES7 on S390, Kernel 2.4.19, Samba 2.2.7a, gcc-2.95.3-62, pam-0.74-34, pam-devel-0.74-34 ./configure \ --prefix=/usr \ --sysconfdir=/etc/samba \ --localstatedir=/var/log/samba \

Hi, i use mandrake 8.2 and i have this error when i run the following command (for pam use). I also have the same error on older mandrake's. Is this related to mandrake or what ? Someone has a solution plz ? make nsswitch/pam_winbind.so Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fPIC nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:65: parse error before `*' nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `converse':

Greetings, ***Warning: New to compiling and use RPMs whenever I can :-)*** When trying to compile I get the above error. It is preceded by: ======= . . . Compiling nsswitch/pam_winbind.c with -fPIC nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:60: parse error before `*' nsswitch/pam_winbind.c: In function `converse': nsswitch/pam_winbind.c:67: `pamh' undeclared (first use in this function)

I am trying to install R-1.4.1 on the Solaris 2.7 OS by compiling the source code. Unfortunately, I obtain a fatal error during make (apparently while using gcc to compile arithmetic.c). The configure command seemed to work acceptably (end of output follows). --(snip)-- R is now configured for sparc-sun-solaris2.7 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C

Hi, We have recently published a paper on floating point accuracy analysis through Monte Carlo Arithmetic. We also released the open-source tool Verificarlo (https://github.com/verificarlo/verificarlo) that relies on LLVM for instrumenting floating point operations. Could you please add our paper to http://llvm.org/pubs/ ? Verificarlo: checking floating point accuracy through Monte Carlo

I haven't been able to build yesterday's R-devel (or, as a test, R-devel_2005-03-11) on Windows XP. The error message I'm getting is to do with 'arithmetic.c', as shown below. Current R-patched seems to build fine, and I've built previous R-devels from source fairly often in the past-- though I have no understanding whatsoever of what's going on. FWIW the only changes

Problem compiling R. version: 0.64.2 machine: SGI O2 OS: IRIX6.5 CC cc FC f77 MAKE GNU make 3.75 Here is part of the the output for make. make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/people/faculty/math/mgass/stage/R/R-0.64.2/src/include' make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/people/faculty/math/mgass/stage/R/R-0.64.2/src/appl' cc -g -OPT:IEEE_NaN_inf=ON -I../include

tree/branch: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master branch HEAD: 4118d9533ff3a5d16efb476a0d00afceecd92cf5 Add linux-next specific files for 20240411 Error/Warning reports: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404120101.dAQBAzh3-lkp at intel.com Error/Warning: (recently discovered and may have been fixed) huge_memory.c:(.text+0x1778): undefined reference

Hi Shile, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v5.8-rc5 next-20200716] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url:

To the R development team: First of all, thank you so much for maintaining wonderful R software. Perhaps, Dr. Ahn has just reported an error on the wilcox.test() function, and suggesting that an error may arise from abs() and rank(). I just had a quick check that the problem may come from the precision of the results of arithmetic functions. 87.7-89.1+1.4 # > 87.7-89.1+1.4 # [1]

This is a Request For Comment, also BCCed to 390 package maintainers of reverse dependencies of the Matrix package. Most users and package authors working with our 'Matrix' package will be using it for numerical computations, and so will be using "dMatrix" (d : double precision) matrix objects M, and indirectly, e.g., for M >= c will also use "lMatrix" (l:

Dear All,   is there a function in R that would help me convert a covariance matrix built based on arithmetic returns to a covariance matrix from log-returns?   As an example of the means and covariance from arithmetic:   mu <-c(0.094,0.006,1.337,1.046,0.263) sigma

Dear R users, I've been trying to build R from sources (in Windows) using Dr. Goto's BLAS, unsuccessfully! I've followed the instructions in Section 3.1.2-3.1.3 of "R Installation and Administration" manual (but maybe I did something wrong), but I keep receiving the following error: -- initially I get -- make: ./Rpwd.exe: Command not found make[1]: ./Rpwd.exe: Command not

On Tue, 2004-01-20 at 23:44, Josh Coalson wrote: > Miroslav did some experiments with searching for optimum blocksize. > from what I remember it made at best a couple percent difference. > there was a thread about it here a while back. > Did his changes make it in? I can think of a coupla ways to approach this and I'd like to hear about what he tried. A couple of % doesnt seem

Hi, I have been compiling R from source code with regularity (both R-patched and R-devel) for several months now. About two/three weeks ago I noticed a compilation error in R-devel (see below). I thought that the error will go away in "due course" so I did not investigate it further. Then I left on vacation. I just downloaded both versions of R sources (i.e., 2.2.0 patched and