search for: argval

I'm trying to turn some GenericValues into Constants in the interpreter using code like this, in a switch statement: case Type::IntTyID: SI = ConstantSInt::get(FB->getType(), ArgVals[i].IntVal); params.push_back(UI); UI->dump(); //for testing break; FB is a Function::ArgumentListType::iterator ArgVals is a std::vector<GenericValue> the switch is on FB->getType()->getTypeID() so basically what I am doing is iterating through the formal arg...

...ere both domain and range are matrices. My erroneous attempts are below. Can you suggest corrections? library(fda) domain<-matrix(c(1,1.1,1.2,2,2.1,2.1,3,3.1,3.2,4,4.1,4.2,5,5.1,5.2), nrow = 5, ncol=3, byrow=TRUE) range<-sin(domain)+matrix(rnorm(15,sd=0.1),nrow=5, ncol=3) myfd<-Data2fd(argvals=domain, y=range) #Error in create.bspline.basis(argvals) : # rangeval is not a vector; class(rangeval) = matrix mybasis<-create.bspline.basis(rangeval=c(0.5,5.2), nbasis=6) myfd<-Data2fd(argvals=domain, y=range,basisobj=mybasis) #Error in smooth.basis(argvals, y, fdP, wtvec = w, fdnames...

...quot;a") the internal C subroutine behind switch is do_switch located in R/src/main/builtin.c For convenience I reproduce it below. ***************************************************************************** SEXP attribute_hidden do_switch(SEXP call, SEXP op, SEXP args, SEXP rho) { int argval; SEXP x, y, w; x = eval(CAR(args), rho); if (!isVector(x) || length(x) != 1) error(_("switch: EXPR must return a length 1 vector")); PROTECT(w = switchList(CDR(args), rho)); if (isString(x)) { for (y = w; y != R_NilValue; y = CDR(y)) if (TAG(y) != R_Nil...

Hi, The poolalloc library fails in TransformFunctionBody.cpp, line 746 --- Value *ArgVal = ConstantAggregateZero::get(PoolAllocate::PoolDescPtrTy); --- opt -load /path_to_lib/libpoolalloc.dylib -poolalloc constaggr.bc -o opt.bc -f triggers the problem (bc file attached). Assertion failed: ((isa<StructType>(Ty) || isa<ArrayType>(Ty) || isa<VectorType>(Ty)) &&a...

...function 'featureNames' and signature 'object = "missing"' > > > Am I expecting the wrong thing or is this broken? I think it's broken. The line that looks broken is in .helpForCall, where it has methods::"elNamed<-"(sigClasses, arg, class(argVal)) Looking at the elNamed<- function, I think this is supposed to be equivalent to sigClasses[[arg]] <- class(argVal) but it is not making any assignment. I don't understand the point of doing the assignment that way, or why it's not working, so I'll leave this for someone e...

...sed at the end of this email. Can you help on this ? Thanks, David %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% R SCRIPT for Data2fd with NAs %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% > library(fda) > y=runif(10) > x=Data2fd(1:10,y) # creates functional object in B-spline basis Warning message: In smooth.basis(argvals, y, fdP, wtvec = w, fdnames = fdnames) : The number of basis functions = 12 exceeds 10 = the number of points to be smoothed. With no smoothing (lambda = 0), this will produce a perfect fit to data that typically has wild excursions between data points. > x$coefs # here it works because no N...

...+ if (memcmp(hdr.e_ident, ELFMAG, SELFMAG) == 0) + load = map_elf; + else + load = load_bzimage; + + devices.max_infd = -1; + devices.dev = NULL; + FD_ZERO(&devices.infds); + + devdescs = map_pages(mem, 1); + arg = 3; + while (argv[arg] && argv[arg][0] == '-') { + const char *argval; + + if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "--sharenet=")) != NULL) + setup_net_file(argval, devdescs, &devices); + else if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "--tunnet=")) != NULL) + setup_tun_net(argval, devdescs, &devices); + else if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "-...

...+ if (memcmp(hdr.e_ident, ELFMAG, SELFMAG) == 0) + load = map_elf; + else + load = load_bzimage; + + devices.max_infd = -1; + devices.dev = NULL; + FD_ZERO(&devices.infds); + + devdescs = map_pages(mem, 1); + arg = 3; + while (argv[arg] && argv[arg][0] == '-') { + const char *argval; + + if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "--sharenet=")) != NULL) + setup_net_file(argval, devdescs, &devices); + else if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "--tunnet=")) != NULL) + setup_tun_net(argval, devdescs, &devices); + else if ((argval = get_arg(argv[arg], "-...

My first patch was a little premature, please use this one. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 17:19, Reid Spencer wrote: > Vyacheslav, > > This is the same problem that I had with Cygwin .. nearly identical. > The issue was documented in PR492 if you want some background. I'm > currently trying to dig up what I did to fix this in December for Cygwin > and see if I can apply the same

...offer any suggestions? isi - vector of argument values - i.e. the independent variable of the curves rlz - data array TMSfdPar - functional data parameter. > TMSfdPar = fdPar(TMSbasis, 4, 0.01) > TMSfdsmooth = smooth.basis(isi, rlz, TMSfdPar) Error in smooth.basis(isi, rlz, TMSfdPar) : 'argvals' is not numeric. I don't understand why the error message keeps popping up. I've tried playing around with Jim Ramsay's datasets and I think my data is organised in a similar manner to his, so can't understand what's going on.... oh, the frustration! Thanks in advance, B...

...re is what I try: >X <-c(0.4541139, 0.4802537, 0.5091228, 0.3894931, 2.1512258, >7.9301281, 62.3876109, 54.1168247, 67.8769904, 91.0670615, 20.0682440) >basis <- create.bspline.basis(c(-100, 100), 7, 5) >MDA.fdPar <- fdPar(basis, 2, 0.01) >MDA.fda.joint <- smooth.pos(argvals=seq(from=-100, to=100, length=11), >y=X, WfdParobj=MDA.fdPar) Iter. PENSSE Grad Length 0 1780.78 -1780.78 1 1753.525 14.318 2 1749.296 15.0611 3 1747.625 15.3031 4 1739.389 16.6266 5 1737.713 16.8989 6 1729.524...

Vyacheslav, This is the same problem that I had with Cygwin .. nearly identical. The issue was documented in PR492 if you want some background. I'm currently trying to dig up what I did to fix this in December for Cygwin and see if I can apply the same change for mingw. Reid. On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 16:39, Vyacheslav Akhmechet wrote: > Ok, I got home so I have more details. Here's the

...s null: llvm::Function *calleeMethod = llvm::dyn_cast<llvm::Function>(builder->CreateLoad(calleeMethodPtr)); So if I then try to execute the following builder->CreateCall function I end up with a segmentation fault since calleeMethod is null: builder->CreateCall(calleeMethod, argVals); Under what circumstances would builder->CreateLoad return null? Is the global vTable's memory not allocated correctly? Or have I been approaching this incorrectly - is there another method in the C++ API that I should be using for indirect function calls? I’d really appreciate any ass...

Hi everyone, I found that LLVM generates redundant code when calling functions with constant parameters, with optimizations disabled. Consider the following C code snippet: int foo(int x, int y); void bar() { foo(1, 2); foo(3, 4); } Clang/LLVM 6.0 generates the following assembly code: _bar: subl $32, %esp movl $1, %eax movl $2, %ecx movl $1, (%esp) movl $2, 4(%esp) movl %eax, 28(%esp) movl