search for: argno

..."key.h" +#include "kex.h" +#include "compat.h" +#include "myproposal.h" +#include "packet.h" +#include "dispatch.h" #include "buffer.h" #include "bufaux.h" #include "log.h" @@ -25,8 +31,20 @@ static int argno = 1; /* Number of argument currently being parsed */ -int family = AF_UNSPEC; /* IPv4, IPv6 or both */ +/* Flag indicating whether IPv4 or IPv6. This can be set on the command line. + Default value is AF_UNSPEC means both IPv4 and IPv6. */ +#ifdef IPV4_DEFAULT +int IPv4or6 = AF_INET; +#else...

...tenlohner <peb at mppmu.mpg.de> -------------- next part -------------- diff -ur openssh-2.9p1.orig/ssh-keyscan.c openssh-2.9p1/ssh-keyscan.c --- openssh-2.9p1.orig/ssh-keyscan.c Wed Mar 14 19:37:13 2001 +++ openssh-2.9p1/ssh-keyscan.c Sun May 13 01:39:43 2001 @@ -30,7 +30,11 @@ static int argno = 1; /* Number of argument currently being parsed */ +#ifdef IPV4_DEFAULT +int family = AF_INET; /* IPv4 */ +#else int family = AF_UNSPEC; /* IPv4, IPv6 or both */ +#endif #define MAXMAXFD 256

In IntrinsicEmitter::EmitTypeGenerate, called from IntrinsicEmitter::EmitGenerator, here for (unsigned j = 0; j != N; ++j) { OS << " ArgTys.push_back("; EmitTypeGenerate(OS, ParamTys[j], ArgNo); OS << ");\n"; } I'm hitting this assertion: if (ArgType->isSubClassOf("LLVMMatchType")) { unsigned Number = ArgType->getValueAsInt("Number"); assert(Number < ArgNo && "Invalid matching number!"); Where both Numb...

....... On Apr 15, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > In IntrinsicEmitter::EmitTypeGenerate, called from > IntrinsicEmitter::EmitGenerator, here > for (unsigned j = 0; j != N; ++j) { > OS << " ArgTys.push_back("; > EmitTypeGenerate(OS, ParamTys[j], ArgNo); > OS << ");\n"; > } > I'm hitting this assertion: > if (ArgType->isSubClassOf("LLVMMatchType")) { > unsigned Number = ArgType->getValueAsInt("Number"); > assert(Number < ArgNo && "Invalid matching number...

...at 10:16 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > >> In IntrinsicEmitter::EmitTypeGenerate, called from >> IntrinsicEmitter::EmitGenerator, here >> for (unsigned j = 0; j != N; ++j) { >> OS << " ArgTys.push_back("; >> EmitTypeGenerate(OS, ParamTys[j], ArgNo); >> OS << ");\n"; >> } >> I'm hitting this assertion: >> if (ArgType->isSubClassOf("LLVMMatchType")) { >> unsigned Number = ArgType->getValueAsInt("Number"); >> assert(Number < ArgNo && "Inv...

On Sep 28, 2007, at 11:36 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same. > If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem > expanding it to i8. > Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all > instructions? > Or there is a more general thing that I

Hello, I have been using the USE class to access the use-def chains of different values. However, what I have noticed is that the set of users of a particular value is limited for the appearance of that variable in the current function. How can I get the interprocedural use of a particular value? For example, if a variable *a* is used as an argument in a function call *foo*, the USE analysis

I have this intrinsic definition for llvm. def int_opencl_math_fdistance_fast : Intrinsic<[llvm_float_ty], [llvm_anyfloat_ty, LLVMMatchType<0>]>; Can someone explain what LLVMMatchType does and how to specify it to match the first argument and not the return value? I've tried LLVMMatchType<1> but it fails in IntrinsicEmitter.cpp

On Apr 15, 2009, at 9:29 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > I have this intrinsic definition for llvm. > def int_opencl_math_fdistance_fast : Intrinsic<[llvm_float_ty], > [llvm_anyfloat_ty, LLVMMatchType<0>]>; > > > Can someone explain what LLVMMatchType does and how to specify it > to match the first argument and not the return value?

I moved my code to 2.1 but still the same. If I make ADD i16 legal, then it goes through, but it has problem expanding it to i8. Should I go ahead and customize it and do the same for all instructions? Or there is a more general thing that I can do? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent:

...nst Function* Fn = DAG.getMachineFunction().getFunction(); std::cout<<Op.Val->getNumValues(); std::cout<<"----------------- "<<__FUNCTION__<<" handling FORMAL_ARGUMENTS of"<<Fn->getName()<<std::endl;std::cout.flush(); for (unsigned ArgNo = 0, e = Op.Val->getNumValues()-1; ArgNo != e; ++ArgNo) { MVT::ValueType ObjectVT = Op.getValue(ArgNo).getValueType(); switch (ObjectVT){ default: assert(0 && "Unhandled argument type!"); case MVT::i32: cout<<"------------ i32"<<s...

Hi Everyone, I asked a question on the dev list related to the topic to which John Criswell and Jeremy Lakeman kindly provided some valuable insight. I'm still stuck on the issue and i'm hoping i didn't phrase the question well enough. I have a *foo.c* file that is : *#include <stdio.h>* *int foo(int a, int b){* * return a+b;* *}* *int main() {* *int x=foo(3,1); *

Hi Folks, I ran into this assertion failure while compiling a function with a large number of arguments: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21609 I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed diff is attached to the bug. However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need to be udpated to reflect the new schema. One such eg: diff --git a/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug_info.ll b/test/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer/debug_i...

...at 10:16 AM, Villmow, Micah wrote: > >> In IntrinsicEmitter::EmitTypeGenerate, called from >> IntrinsicEmitter::EmitGenerator, here >> for (unsigned j = 0; j != N; ++j) { >> OS << " ArgTys.push_back("; >> EmitTypeGenerate(OS, ParamTys[j], ArgNo); >> OS << ");\n"; >> } >> I'm hitting this assertion: >> if (ArgType->isSubClassOf("LLVMMatchType")) { >> unsigned Number = ArgType->getValueAsInt("Number"); >> assert(Number < ArgNo && "Inv...

Hi I find various argument lowering functions that add registers to function live in do the following args_float[ArgNo] = AddLiveIn(MF, args_float[ArgNo], &Alpha::F4RCRegClass); Do these live in registers get used later during liveness analysis/register allocation ? How can I verify if it has indeed impacted the live intervals? thanks shrey

...n into this assertion failure while compiling a function with a >> large number of arguments: >> >> https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21609 >> >> I have coded up the fix as per David's suggestion (added a new header >> field for DIVariable to separate out ArgNo & LineNo). The proposed >> diff is attached to the bug. >> >> However, there are around 175 testcases across clang & llvm that need >> to be udpated to reflect the new schema. One such eg: > > > The debug info has changed substantially in the last few months...

...allSite and DICallSiteParam are defined and these are emitted by the Clang frontend. The metadata is associated to the call or invoke IR instruction. Here is an example: %call5 = call i32 @fed_em_strncmp(i8* %arraydecay, i8* %arraydecay1, i64 5), !dbg !114, !call_site !101 … !99 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 1, variable: !91, expr: !DIExpression()) !100 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 2, variable: !95, expr: !DIExpression()) !101 = !DICallSite(scope: !87, file: !3, parameters: !102, line: 40, calledSubprogram: !13) !102 = !{!99, !100, !103} !103 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 3, expr: !DIExpression(DW_OP_lit5) F...

...e to uses of the corresponding llvm::Argument > instance? Is there a reason why you're avoiding that? This won't > work for varargs, but that's a difficult problem anyway. > > Specifically, I'm saying: > > if (user is CallInst or InvokeInst) { > unsigned ArgNo = // Get argument no. of Use & > if (auto *F = getCallTargetIfPossible()) { > pushToWorklist(F->getArgument(ArgNo)->users()); // Or recurse > } > } > > -- Sanjoy > -- Dounia KHALDI Research Assistant Professor Institute for Advanced Computational S...

...ned and these are emitted by the Clang frontend. The metadata is associated to the call or invoke IR instruction. Here is an example: > > %call5 = call i32 @fed_em_strncmp(i8* %arraydecay, i8* %arraydecay1, i64 5), !dbg !114, !call_site !101 > … > !99 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 1, variable: !91, expr: !DIExpression()) > !100 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 2, variable: !95, expr: !DIExpression()) > !101 = !DICallSite(scope: !87, file: !3, parameters: !102, line: 40, calledSubprogram: !13) > !102 = !{!99, !100, !103} > !103 = !DICallSiteParam(argno:...

...metadata is associated to the call or invoke IR instruction. Here is > an example: > > > > %call5 = call i32 @fed_em_strncmp(i8* %arraydecay, i8* %arraydecay1, > i64 5), !dbg !114, !call_site !101 > > … > > !99 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 1, variable: !91, expr: > !DIExpression()) > > !100 = !DICallSiteParam(argno: 2, variable: !95, expr: > !DIExpression()) > > !101 = !DICallSite(scope: !87, file: !3, parameters: !102, line: 40, > calledSubprogram: !13) > > !102 = !{!99...