search for: argments

I use dovecot-lda to deliver incoming email from Exim to Dovecot. After having some problems with email bounces with empty envelope sender not being delivered because of an empty -f argument, I discovered that Exim can pass email to Dovecot using dovecot-lda without using the -f argument at all. Would this have any adverse effects anywhere else? The docs don't even seem to specify if -f

The survival package makes significant use of the "specials" argument of terms(), before calling model.frame; it is part of nearly every modeling function. The reason is that strata argments simply have to be handled differently than other things on the right hand side. Likewise for tt() and cluster(), though those are much less frequent. I now get "bug reports" from the growing segment that believes one should put packagename:: in front of every single instance.?? For ins...

I would like to use the 'tryCatch' function but am having a hard time getting my head around it. In 'C' like languages try/catch/finally means try a block of statements and if any throw an error then do the statements in the catch block and then error or not always do the staements in the finally block. In 'R' as best as I can tell the block of staements in the try block is

...thank the R developers to permit it. >(in my opinion, it should even be mandatory). >(By the way, marking the end of lines with a unique symbol >makes also the job easier for the following treatment.) >And yes, I'm also a C programmer ;-) > > > {and I have another chain of argments why "<-" is so more > > expressive than "=" > >Why "<-" seems better than "=" is also quite mysterious for me. >There was a discussion about this point recently I think. >I believe in 99% of cases it's more for historical reason...

Dear everyone, I have looked all over the internet but I cannot find a way to solve my problem. In my data I want to sum a couple of variables. Some of these variables have NA values, and when I add them together, the result is NA dat <- data.frame( id = gl(5,1), var1 = rnorm(5, 10), var2 = rnorm(5, 7), var3 = rnorm(5, 6), var4 = rnorm(5, 3), var5 = rnorm(5, 8) ) dat[3,3] <- NA dat[4,5]

Hi. Does someone make update for `Multiple IP(or Host) listen in dovecot.conf'? I made trivial patch so. But this patch doesn't solve `Support listening in multiple sockets' in TODO. It appends only the capability as multiple listen in dovecot.conf. So, `login_processes_count' becomes ambiguous. In CASE1, login_processes_count = 2, forked imap-login processes are 8. -- samples

...orite was: * Static data member: s_<lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> * Non-static data members: _<lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> (This was allowed by the C++ standard I last read. It’s _<UpperCase> that is reserved) * Function argments: <lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase>_ * Function local variables: <lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> * Class/Struct identifiers: <UpperCaseLetterThenCamelCase> Even “smart” IDE’s can become confused – I’ve tried s...

This is what I have class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :image, :polymorphic => true acts_as_list :scope => image end class Place < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end I want to be able to reorder the images. What I need is for the position of the photos to be set

> On Feb 2, 2019, at 8:18 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 1, 2019, at 6:20 AM, Michael Platings via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As application of the naming rules are currently under discussion [1] this seems like a good time