search for: argment

I use dovecot-lda to deliver incoming email from Exim to Dovecot. After having some problems with email bounces with empty envelope sender not being delivered because of an empty -f argument, I discovered that Exim can pass email to Dovecot using dovecot-lda without using the -f argument at all. Would this have any adverse effects anywhere else? The docs don't even seem to specify if -f

I would like to use the 'tryCatch' function but am having a hard time getting my head around it. In 'C' like languages try/catch/finally means try a block of statements and if any throw an error then do the statements in the catch block and then error or not always do the staements in the finally block. In 'R' as best as I can tell the block of staements in the try block is

...thank the R developers to permit it. >(in my opinion, it should even be mandatory). >(By the way, marking the end of lines with a unique symbol >makes also the job easier for the following treatment.) >And yes, I'm also a C programmer ;-) > > > {and I have another chain of argments why "<-" is so more > > expressive than "=" > >Why "<-" seems better than "=" is also quite mysterious for me. >There was a discussion about this point recently I think. >I believe in 99% of cases it's more for historical reason...

Dear everyone, I have looked all over the internet but I cannot find a way to solve my problem. In my data I want to sum a couple of variables. Some of these variables have NA values, and when I add them together, the result is NA dat <- data.frame( id = gl(5,1), var1 = rnorm(5, 10), var2 = rnorm(5, 7), var3 = rnorm(5, 6), var4 = rnorm(5, 3), var5 = rnorm(5, 8) ) dat[3,3] <- NA dat[4,5]

..... } -- Update brief. src/master/ master-setting.h: listen_fd and related members changed to array_t. also name add (s). master-setting.c: few member initialization delete. main.c: handle multiple IP and port, fds as array_t. resolve_ip argment change. login-process.h: add listen_fd and ssl_listen_fd member to login_group structre. login-process.c: add login_groups_create function for mapping login process to each listen fd. change dup2 source fd in create_login_process. src/lib network.c: c...

...orite was: * Static data member: s_<lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> * Non-static data members: _<lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> (This was allowed by the C++ standard I last read. It’s _<UpperCase> that is reserved) * Function argments: <lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase>_ * Function local variables: <lowerCaseLetterThenCamelCase> * Class/Struct identifiers: <UpperCaseLetterThenCamelCase> Even “smart” IDE’s can become confused – I’ve tried...

This is what I have class Photo < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :image, :polymorphic => true acts_as_list :scope => image end class Place < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end class Child < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :photos, :as => :image end I want to be able to reorder the images. What I need is for the position of the photos to be set

> On Feb 2, 2019, at 8:18 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at nondot.org> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 1, 2019, at 6:20 AM, Michael Platings via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> As application of the naming rules are currently under discussion [1] this seems like a good time