search for: arcus

On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via s...

...wine returns localhost address to you... Why ? I just tested Your testing code (just slightly modified to get it to compile) on both plain linux as well as in wine and in both cases it returns my real public IP. Isn't your Linux networking setup (/etc/hosts table) a bit wrong ? My one contains (arcus is my machine name) 127.0.0.1 localhost 195.39.17.7 arcus.sinus.cz arcus I have already seen broken setups containing things like 127.0.0.1 localhost arcus which is of course wrong. Regards, Pavel Troller

On 11/06/19 16:44, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> >>>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote:...

On 02/12/19 16:53, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/12/2019 16:24, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> </snip> > >>> You should have 'vfs objects = dfs_samba4 acl_xattr recycle' >> >> Thank you very much for this - now it is working. This lack of >> permissions inheritance issue has been plaguing me for months - it is >&gt...

On 21/08/17 13:39, Robert Wolf wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Sebastian Arcus wrote: > >> >> On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: >>> On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >>>> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or >>>> 993 over 143? or? >>> There is no concrete a...

On 02/12/19 15:44, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 02/12/2019 15:32, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 02/12/19 15:10, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> >> Thank you for the quick reply. I should have mentioned that these DC's >> are at at different sites. At each site there is only one Linux server >> - hence why the DC is also the...

On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> >> On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>> On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>>> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >>>> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the...

Check the kr5b.conf and confirm DNS is working On Fri, Mar 9, 2018 at 9:20 PM, Sebastian Arcus via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On 09/03/18 10:52, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > >> I am moving a Samba AD DC to a new server (I am merging two different >> hardware servers serving different functions). The new server has the same >> name as...

...to work when the user is in the X group. But it only works when I apply the filter with "Authenticated Users" (Default), when mute for user / group specific does not work. On windows with "gpresult / r" the gpo does not look as loaded. Regards Em 01-06-2017 08:05, Sebastian Arcus via samba escreveu: > On 31/05/17 22:26, Carlos A. P. Cunha wrote: >> Hello! >> >> Thanks. >> >> I'm trying but still unsuccessful ..... > > Is this a computer or a user GPO? > > >> >> >> Em 30-05-2017 16:05, Sebastian Arcus via sam...

Hello! Thanks. I'm trying but still unsuccessful ..... Regards Em 30-05-2017 16:05, Sebastian Arcus via samba escreveu: > > On 30/05/17 15:42, Carlos A. P. Cunha via samba wrote: >> Hello! >> >> My Configuration: >> >> lsb_release -a >> >> No LSB modules are available. >> Distributor ID: Ubuntu >> Description: Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS >&...

On 11/06/19 11:07, Rowland penny via samba wrote: > On 11/06/2019 10:34, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >> I've just upgraded a Samba AD server to 4.10.2 a few weeks ago from >> 4.x (I'm afraid I'm not sure the exact earlier version) - and since >> then I just haven't managed to pin down the file permissions and >> inheritance on the shares...

I've just bought an OpenVOX B200p ISDN card - and if I remember correctly from last time I used one of these - it is possible to use either DAHDI or mISDN with it. Are there any factors to consider when choosing which software to use? Is one better than the other - or does one have features which are not present in the other? I will be using it for a simple PBX, with 2 ISDN channels as

On 11/06/19 14:54, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > > On 11/06/19 13:29, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >> On 11/06/2019 13:13, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>> >>> On 11/06/19 11:49, Rowland penny via samba wrote: >>>> On 11/06/2019 11:38, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: >>&gt...

On 02/06/2020 12:16, Sebastian Arcus via samba wrote: > Does anybody have any idea what might be happening here? I've just > copied the configs and databases and Linux users to another machine > with Samba 4.6.7 - and classicupgrade does the same thing - it doesn't > import any users. I am guessing that maybe Sa...

I am moving a Samba AD DC to a new server (I am merging two different hardware servers serving different functions). The new server has the same name as the old one, and same IP addresses on the network interfaces. I have moved the following directories: /var/lib/samba /var/cache/samba /etc/samba/ /var/named/ Samba will start, Bind starts (I'm using the Bind backend), the dns tests from

On 12/05/17 09:10, Marc Muehlfeld wrote: > Hi Sebastian, > > Am 11.05.2017 um 19:39 schrieb Sebastian Arcus via samba: >> I can see in the docs that a domain rename is not >> recommended/supported by Samba for an already provisioned domain. >> However, what I can't work out is if this is not possible during the >> classicupgrade step either? > > > Theoretically i...

On 12/03/18 11:28, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 12 Mar 2018 11:11:44 +0000 > Sebastian Arcus via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> I have a Samba AD running Samba 4.7.5. Everything was working fine, >> when, seemingly out of the blue, the users started to be denied >> access to all shares. If I try from a Windows 7 or Windows 10 >> machine, logg...

On 21/08/17 10:37, Gedalya wrote: > On 08/21/2017 07:28 AM, voytek at sbt.net.au wrote: >> is there a 'preferred way'? should I tell users to use 143 over 993 ? or >> 993 over 143? or? > There is no concrete answer. There are various opinions and feelings about this. > The opinion againt 993/995 is that these are not standard ports, Out of curiosity, is there a

So by default to get STI, I would have something like: create_table :items do |t| t.column "type", :string t.column "title", :string end But if I want to store those type values in a separate table, such that I have ... create_table :items do |t| t.column "item_type_id", :string t.column "title", :string

I can see in the docs that a domain rename is not recommended/supported by Samba for an already provisioned domain. However, what I can't work out is if this is not possible during the classicupgrade step either? Does this make any difference, or would it present the same difficulties as renaming an already provisioned Samba AD? It case what I'm asking is not quite clear - I have a