Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "arcpcm".
Did you mean:
arcp
2005 Nov 14
2
Ambisonics und OggPCM
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:44:43AM +1100, Jean-Marc Valin wrote:
>
> Sorry, but that fork took over now. As I mentioned in the last email,
> your version needs to be renamed ArcPCM to reflect the fact that it's a
> mix of Pulse Code Modulation with your ego.
No. I started OggPCM, since it was never proposed to Xiph.org it remains my
trademark until which time it is accepted by Xiph and by myself for release.
It would be similar to me releasing Speex v2.0 - it is n...
2005 Nov 14
3
Ambisonics und OggPCM
On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 03:10:22AM +1100, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> That spec is being superceded by:
>
> http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2
The project has been forked, not superceded.
Work on OggPCM is continuing, the team working on OggPCM2 is free to submit
their own draft but some are not welcome to continue work on OggPCM due to
their recent social conduct.
I'm
2005 Nov 13
0
OggPCM madness
...nored my comments when I disapproved.
Now, I'm not sure where to go from here, but we need to find a format
that everyone (more or less) agrees on and not a format where every
trivial detail needs to be debated for hours until Arc "approves" it
(Arc, you're free to call your spec ArcPCM if you like).
Jean-Marc
2005 Nov 14
0
Ambisonics und OggPCM
...00, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> > That spec is being superceded by:
> >
> > http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/OggPCM2
>
> The project has been forked, not superceded.
Sorry, but that fork took over now. As I mentioned in the last email,
your version needs to be renamed ArcPCM to reflect the fact that it's a
mix of Pulse Code Modulation with your ego.
> Work on OggPCM is continuing, the team working on OggPCM2 is free to submit
> their own draft but some are not welcome to continue work on OggPCM due to
> their recent social conduct.
First don't worr...