search for: archlinuxarm

> Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a > distribution like ArchLinuxArm? Yes, Ubuntu on ARM is softfp. But I already told Bill the platform I prepare to test and the testing day begins *tomorrow*, I prefer what it likes now. BTW, what if I use a cross compiler with hardfp enabled to compile LLVM first, then run it on Ubuntu/ARM? Does it achieve your goal, too? Rega...

...d > on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run > regression > test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see > if I > miss something? Thanks! > Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a distribution like ArchLinuxArm? > Here is the pandaboard configuration, > > --- > $ uname -a > Linux arm2 2.6.38-1208-omap4 #11-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT Fri Apr 15 16:34:35 > UTC 2011 armv7l armv7l armv7l GNU/Linux > $ gcc -v > gcc version 4.5.2 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.5.2-8ubuntu4) > $ ld -v > GNU ld (GNU Bi...

On Sun, Apr 15, 2012 at 2:02 AM, 陳韋任 <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> wrote: > > Ubuntu on ARM is softfp, right? How about testing hardfp with a > > distribution like ArchLinuxArm? > > Yes, Ubuntu on ARM is softfp. But I already told Bill the platform I > prepare > to test and the testing day begins *tomorrow*, I prefer what it likes now. > BTW, > what if I use a cross compiler with hardfp enabled to compile LLVM first, > then > run it on Ubuntu/ARM...

thanks - this has been fun. There is one other thing I have been having trouble with - and i've tried it on two archlinuxarm installs and gotten the same thing. i am not even sure if its important for me. but if i try to configure and make with neon support - it cant find the neon libraries. despite neon having been installed several different ways (i tried pacman, as well as compiling and installign neon from source...

Hi all, Since the 3.1 testing day is coming and be a ARM tester, I would like to make sure everything is O.K. so that we don't waste the precious time. As discussed on the ML before, I plan to cross compile LLVM/Clang first, then run regression test and test suite on the pandaboards. Could someone help me check to see if I miss something? Thanks! Here is the pandaboard configuration,

On Jun 12, 2015, at 10:33 AM, Greg Hersch <hersch.greg at gmail.com> wrote: > thanks - this has been fun. > > There is one other thing I have been having trouble with - and i've tried it on two archlinuxarm installs and gotten the same thing. i am not even sure if its important for me. but if i try to configure and make with neon support - it cant find the neon libraries. despite neon having been installed several different ways (i tried pacman, as well as compiling and installign neon from source) &g...

...nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: tristan-c.bastian at gmx.de QA Contact: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Created attachment 143512 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=143512&action=edit Output of dmesg Since I upgraded mesa to version 18.3.3 on ArchlinuxARM I'm only getting a black screen on bootup with my cursor on it.. I'm running kernel 4.20.4 I'm able to move my cursor and also see a different cursor if I move over the place where the password input field would normally be. If I downgrade mesa to version 18.3.2 I'm not seeing this...

Greg, I'm still not 100% on what is going on, but after comparing the call stack with a debug session here, I think I have at least identified why I wasn't seeing similar behavior. There are two ways that the driver can get information from the UPS: asking the UPS for a specific report (which returns one or more values), and checking the interrupt pipe (which the UPS can fill with