Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "architekt".
Did you mean:
architect
2004 Dec 15
4
Re-2: Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
...be the Problem.
Now I've checked that on a machine with SP1 - and the jobs
from the same printqueue are removed correctly there!
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ? (14-Dez-2004 19:13)
From: novosirj@umdnj.edu
To: t.pompe@architekt-prinz.at
> Refer to some older messages -- there's a printing patch. HOWEVER, I am
> also told that this is related to an XP SP2 bug. Do you have SP2?
>
> ---- _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
> |Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | | Ryan Novosielski - User Support Spec. III
> |$&| |__|...
2004 Dec 22
0
Re-4: Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
...d since these
are production machines, I can't play around with the
configurations too much!
Regards
Thomas
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: Re-2: [Samba] Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ? (22-Dez-2004 13:51)
From: KCollins@nesbittengineering.com
To: t.pompe@architekt-prinz.at
> Can you be a little more specific about the "access rights" you changed?
> Were they CUPS rights or Samba rights? What did you change them to?
>
> No one here (except for myself) ever accesses the web front-end for CUPS,
> we
> simply use the Windows print...
2004 Dec 14
4
Samba 3.0.9 doesn't remove printjobs ?
Hello!
I'm using samba with CUPS printing (with raw passthru)
for a long time now and it worked very well.
But after upgrading my samba installation from 3.0.2 to 3.0.9,
the printjobs (sent from XP Workstations) aren't
removed from the joblist anymore.
Means: the job is printed correctly, but opening the
printqueue on the XP machine still contains the job
(not only mine, but jobs from