search for: architecure

Dear all, I've recently installed Asterisk and am trying to understand where exactly Asterisk 'fits' in my VOIP architecture. Can/does Asterisk work as a proxy. I am specifically interested in SIP. Could anyone perhaps point me out to a diagram with SIP users and Asterisk to better understand how I should set up my network? Thank you

...Chris Bishop's book "Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition". Although the book gave me good theoretical foundation about NN, I'm now looking for something more practical regarding architecture selection strategies. Is there any good reference about "best practices" for architecure selection? (ii) Which R package provides a good implementation of NN? Many thanks in advance for your help! Lars. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

There are following functions in bitreader.c: FLAC__bool FLAC__bitreader_read_unary_unsigned(FLAC__BitReader *br, unsigned *val); FLAC__bool FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed(FLAC__BitReader *br, int *val, unsigned parameter); FLAC__bool FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed_block(FLAC__BitReader *br, int vals[], unsigned nvals, unsigned parameter); * function FLAC__bitreader_read_rice_signed():

...package, and also when built from scratch using the most recent version of samba (downloaded yesterday). If I change the share path to a directory on a UFS partition, all is well. I can not get a stack trace, as even with symbols enabled, the log tells me that it cannot make a core dump for this architecure. I can however get a "log level = 10" paste later today if needed. Is this a bug or a limitation in samba? Thanks -- Best Regards Edd http://students.dec.bmth.ac.uk/ebarrett

Hi, I am new to llvm with a particular interested in the optimization area, specially on SLP. While working through the tutorial, I ran this example [1] with the hope to see SLP vectorization in action but for some reason, I do not see it on the LLVM assembly as seen below. Is there anything I am missing? I am using Clearlinux as build machine and this has clang version 9.0.0.

In the long list of globals that are now in the TargetOptions struct, I noticed this one was misspelled. llvm::LessPrecideFPMAD() And now that I look it over w/ spellcheck: ARM Architecural Reference pre-unfied returns_twice fo functions

lvqcl wrote: > Is it Ok to pass FLAC__int32* in a function that expects int* ? Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/ architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are the same. As for pointers, all pointers are the same until you try an increment them. If you have some type, lets call it sometype_t, and a pointer to types of sometype_t : sometype_t * ptr = 0 ; and you then increment it using...

Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: > Well FLAC__int32 is just a 32 bit integer and on all the platforms/ > architecures/compilers that FLAC supports FLAC__int32 and int are > the same. > > Personally I think the FLAC__xxxx stuff should go, to be replaced with > C standard int32_t, uint32_t, int16_t etc, at least for internal code. > I am slowly doing that when I touch code. > > I don't thin...

...thout-system-zlib It gets as far as "Checking for xmkmf ..no" configure: WARNING: I could not determine CPICFLAGS and then just says error, consult the docs for answers. I'm using the HP compilers, with modern implementations of gcc there is no fortran compiler for the Itanium/HPUX architecure, is this a problem? I have the config.log if anyone is interested. Thanks in advance, Dan Jackson Sr. UNIX Systems Administrator dejackso at mdanderson.org office 713.745.0836 cell 832.277.6110 pager 7134041920 at archwireless.net

Hi, I'm trying to compile (windows) cpp-sources on a Sun Fire X2100 using wineg++. I have managed that all sources are compiled without complain, but finally ld aborts with an error message about i386 and x86-64 architecures. Any idea, what I should do? thx, teb $wineg++ *.cpp ld: Relocatable linking with relocations from format elf32-i386 (/usr/lib/wine/libwinecrt0.a(exe_entry.o)) to format elf64-x86-64 (a.EjEWYl.o) is not supported winebuild: ld -r failed with status 256 winegcc: winebuild failed.

Hi all, Currently in the llvm middle-end, we disable some optimizations because we worry about the register pressure, (e.g. GVNHoist and ArgumentPromotion). However, in the architecture that are register-rich, e.g. FPGAs, we do not need to worry about the register pressure at all. For these architecures, we may want to optimization the LLVM IR without worrying about the register pressure. I suggest that we introduce a hook in the TargetTransformInfo to tell if the current target architecture is register-rich or not. With this hook, we can enable the optimizations that increase register pressure...

...bit > above 15 might be even better, though this will of course depend on > the architecture, compiler, etc. > > Simon Urbaneck points out in reply to my message about speeding up > "sum" and "prod" that the effects of changes like this depend on the > machine architecure, compiler, etc. ?This is of course true. ?The > magnitude of variation in his results (not the absolute times, but the > relative times of different versions) is rather larger than one would > expect, though. ?Perhaps his time measurements were affected by random > factors like system l...

Dear All, My system has about 30,000 accounts and these accounts are created as unix system users. Each account has its own entry in /etc/passwd with different UID and home directory. We plan to deploy an Layer 4 switch as a load balancer. Proposed architecure is as the following: ---- internet ---- Layer 4 switch ---- mail server1 ---- NFS storage | | |--- mail server2 -----| Both mail servers will share the same storage which contains users...

..., it seems that a threshold a bit above 15 might be even better, though this will of course depend on the architecture, compiler, etc. Simon Urbaneck points out in reply to my message about speeding up "sum" and "prod" that the effects of changes like this depend on the machine architecure, compiler, etc. This is of course true. The magnitude of variation in his results (not the absolute times, but the relative times of different versions) is rather larger than one would expect, though. Perhaps his time measurements were affected by random factors like system load, or perhaps they...

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi Folks, > We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now > Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance > on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86 > platform, and is short of cross-architecture framework. Currently, we > have a proposal for KVM source layout to accommodate new

Zhang, Xiantao wrote: > Hi Folks, > We are working on enabling KVM support on IA64 platform, and now > Linux, Windows guests get stable run and achieve reasonable performance > on KVM with Open GFW. But you know, the current KVM only considers x86 > platform, and is short of cross-architecture framework. Currently, we > have a proposal for KVM source layout to accommodate new

...k: /:path/:basename/index.html --- -Amazon AMI information here +CentOS Amazon AMI images =========================== -Basic info on Amazon images here +Here is the list of current/up2date AMI images IDs that we made public. + +So far we build/update/maintain the following CentOS variants and architecures: + + * CentOS Linux 8 (x86_64 and aarch64) + * CentOS Linux 7 (x86_64 and aarch64) + +You can search for architecture or region through search bar. + +Please note that you can also directly use then the "Deploy Link" function to deploy in specific region, one click away. <input ty...

...\ + -p /path/to/diskimage-builder/elements \ + --ramdisk \ + --name ramdisk \ + ubuntu deploy-ironic + +This builds a ramdisk for the Ironic OpenStack component based +on the Ubuntu distribution. + +=head1 OPTIONS + +=over 4 + +=item B<--help> + +Display help. + +=item B<--arch> ARCHITECURE + +Use the specified architecture for the output image. The default +value is the same as the host running virt-dib. + +Notes: right now it does nothing more than setting the C<ARCH> +environment variable for the elements. + +=item B<-B> PATH + +Set the path to the library directory of...

...+and F</usr/share/diskimage-builder/lib> when installed in F</usr>. + +This parameter is B<mandatory>, as virt-dib needs to provide it for +the elements (as some of them might use scripts in it). +Virt-dib itself does not make use of the library directory. + +=item B<--arch> ARCHITECURE + +Use the specified architecture for the output image. The default +value is the same as the host running virt-dib. + +Right now this option does nothing more than setting the C<ARCH> +environment variable for the elements, and it's up to them to +produce an image for the requested arch...

...\ + -p /path/to/diskimage-builder/elements \ + --ramdisk \ + --name ramdisk \ + ubuntu deploy-ironic + +This builds a ramdisk for the Ironic OpenStack component based +on the Ubuntu distribution. + +=head1 OPTIONS + +=over 4 + +=item B<--help> + +Display help. + +=item B<--arch> ARCHITECURE + +Use the specified architecture for the output image. The default +value is the same as the host running virt-dib. + +Notes: right now it does nothing more than setting the C<ARCH> +environment variable for the elements. + +=item B<--blacklist> SCRIPT + +Blacklist the use of any elem...