search for: arch_binaries

Few improvements to the results of the inspection on some distros. Pino Toscano (5): inspect: factorize list of rolling distros inspect: detect Gentoo from os-release inspect: fully detect Arch Linux from os-release inspect: return osinfo short IDs for rolling distros inspect: correct osinfo ID for ALT Linux >= 8 daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml | 15 +++++++++------

...++++++++++---------- daemon/inspect_fs_windows.ml | 2 +- 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml b/daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml index 59e26a05e..3ad119306 100644 --- a/daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml +++ b/daemon/inspect_fs_unix.ml @@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ let arch_binaries = *) let rec parse_os_release release_file data = let chroot = Chroot.create ~name:"parse_os_release" () in - let lines = Chroot.f chroot (fun () -> read_small_file release_file) () in + let lines = Chroot.f chroot read_small_file release_file in match lines with | None...

...let re_openbsd = PCRE.compile "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)" let re_frugalware = PCRE.compile "Frugalware (\\d+)\\.(\\d+)" let re_pldlinux = PCRE.compile "(\\d+)\\.(\\d+) PLD Linux" +let re_neokylin_version = PCRE.compile "^V(\\d+)Update(\\d+)$" let arch_binaries = [ "/bin/bash"; "/bin/ls"; "/bin/echo"; "/bin/rm"; "/bin/sh" ] @@ -94,7 +95,7 @@ let rec parse_os_release release_file data = else if key = "PRETTY_NAME" then data.product_name <- Some value els...

...ot; +let re_minix = PCRE.compile "^(\\d+)\\.(\\d+)(\\.(\\d+))?" +let re_openbsd = PCRE.compile "^OpenBSD (\\d+|\\?)\\.(\\d+|\\?)" +let re_frugalware = PCRE.compile "Frugalware (\\d+)\\.(\\d+)" +let re_pldlinux = PCRE.compile "(\\d+)\\.(\\d+) PLD Linux" + +let arch_binaries = + [ "/bin/bash"; "/bin/ls"; "/bin/echo"; "/bin/rm"; "/bin/sh" ] + +(* Parse a os-release file. + * + * Only few fields are parsed, falling back to the usual detection if we + * cannot read all of them. + * + * For the format of os-release, see al...

...\([0-9]+\\)\\(\\.\\([0-9]+\\)\\)?" +let re_openbsd = Str.regexp "^OpenBSD \\([0-9]+\\|\\?\\)\\.\\([0-9]+\\|\\?\\)" +let re_frugalware = Str.regexp "Frugalware \\([0-9]+\\)\\.\\([0-9]+\\)" +let re_pldlinux = Str.regexp "\\([0-9]+\\)\\.\\([0-9]+\\) PLD Linux" + +let arch_binaries = + [ "/bin/bash"; "/bin/ls"; "/bin/echo"; "/bin/rm"; "/bin/sh" ] + +(* Parse a os-release file. + * + * Only few fields are parsed, falling back to the usual detection if we + * cannot read all of them. + * + * For the format of os-release, see al...

v9 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00139.html This depends on these three series (the first two being single minor patches): https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00207.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00209.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00215.html There is no substantive change. I

This depends on the patch series "[PATCH 00/27] Reimplement many daemon APIs in OCaml." (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00098.html) v8 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00274.html v9: - I split up the mega-patch into a more reviewable series of smaller, incremental patches. There are some other changes vs v8, but

This fixes almost everything. Note that it adds an extra commit which fixes the whole utf8/iconv business. It's probably better to list what isn't fixed: (1) I didn't leave the osinfo code around because I'm still haven't looked too closely at virt-builder-repository. Can't we just fetch this code from the git history when we need it? (2) I didn't change the way

v10: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-July/msg00245.html No actual change here, but I rebased and retested. Also this series now does not depend on any other patch series since everything else needed is upstream. Rich.

v6 was posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00103.html and this requires the utilities refactoring posted here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html Inspection is now complete[*], although not very well tested. I'm intending to compare the output of many guests using old & new virt-inspector to see if I can find any

v5: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00065.html Since v5, this now implements inspection almost completely for Linux and Windows guests. Rich.

v7 was: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00169.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00184.html I believe this addresses all comments received so far. Also it now passes a test where I compared about 100 disk images processed with old and new virt-inspector binaries. The output is identical in all cases except one which is caused by a bug in blkid