search for: arbiter3

After force the add-brick gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 force volume add-brick: success pve01:~# gluster volume info Volume Name: VMS Type: Distributed-Replicate Volume ID: e1a4f787-3f62-441e-a7ce-c0ae6b111ebf Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 3 x (2 + 1) = 9 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1: gluster1:/disco2TB-0/vms Brick2: gluster...

...volume structure right now? Best Regards, Strahil Nikolov On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 18:24, Gilberto Ferreira<gilberto.nunes32 at gmail.com> wrote: So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the command if you want to override this behavior. ? pve01:~#...

But if I change replica 2 arbiter 1 to replica 3 arbiter 1 gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 I got thir error: volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant configuration. Use 'force' at the end of the command if you want to override this beh...

...have a small disk like 480G in size. And I created 3 partitions formatted with XFS using imaxpct=75, as suggested in previous emails. And than in the gluster nodes, I tried to add the brick gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3/arbiter3 But to my surprise (or not!) I got this message: volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the...

So I went ahead and do the force (is with you!) gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co nfiguration. Use 'force' at the end of the command if you want to override this behavior. pve01:~# gl...

.... > And I created 3 partitions?formatted?with XFS using?imaxpct=75, as > suggested in previous emails. > > And than in the gluster nodes, I tried to add the brick > gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 > arbiter:/arbiter1/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2/arbiter2 > arbiter:/arbiter3/arbiter3 > > But to my surprise (or not!) I got this message: > volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are > present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should > be on different nodes to have best fault tolerant co > nfiguration. Use ...

...maxpct=75, > > > as suggested in previous emails. > > > > > > And than in the gluster nodes, I tried to add the brick > > > gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 > > > arbiter:/arbiter1/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2/arbiter2 > > > arbiter:/arbiter3/arbiter3 > > > > > > But to my surprise (or not!) I got this message: > > > volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume > > > are present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks > > > should be on different nodes to hav...

...n size. > And I created 3 partitions formatted with XFS using imaxpct=75, as > suggested in previous emails. > > And than in the gluster nodes, I tried to add the brick > gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1/arbiter1 > arbiter:/arbiter2/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3/arbiter3 > > But to my surprise (or not!) I got this message: > volume add-brick: failed: Multiple bricks of a replicate volume are > present on the same server. This setup is not optimal. Bricks should be on > different nodes to have best fault tolerant co > nfiguration. Use '...

...ck: failed: Operation failed > pve01:~# gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 > gluster1:/disco2TB-0/vms gluster2:/disco2TB-0/vms gluster1:/disco1TB-0/vms > gluster2:/disco1TB-0/vms gluster1:/disco1TB-1/vms gluster2: > /disco1TB-1/vms arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 > arbiter:/arbiter4 > volume add-brick: failed: Operation failed > > --- > > > Gilberto Nunes Ferreira > > > > > > > > Em ter., 5 de nov. de 2024 ?s 13:39, Andreas Schwibbe <a.schwibbe at gmx.net> > escreveu: > > > If you create a volum...

...r1.home.local Connected 99ed1f1e-7169-4da8-b630-a712a5b71ccd gluster2 Connected 4718ead7-aebd-4b8b-a401-f9e8b0acfeb1 localhost Connected But when I do this: pve01:~# gluster volume add-brick VMS replica 2 arbiter 1 arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 I got this error: For arbiter configuration, replica count must be 3 and arbiter count must be 1. The 3rd brick of the replica will be the arbiter Usage: volume add-brick <VOLNAME> [<replica> <COUNT> [arbiter <COUNT>]] <NEW-BRICK> ... [force] gluster vol info pve01:...

...ation failed >> pve01:~# gluster vol add-brick VMS replica 3 arbiter 1 >> gluster1:/disco2TB-0/vms gluster2:/disco2TB-0/vms gluster1:/disco1TB-0/vms >> gluster2:/disco1TB-0/vms gluster1:/disco1TB-1/vms gluster2: >> /disco1TB-1/vms arbiter:/arbiter1 arbiter:/arbiter2 arbiter:/arbiter3 >> arbiter:/arbiter4 >> volume add-brick: failed: Operation failed >> >> --- >> >> >> Gilberto Nunes Ferreira >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Em ter., 5 de nov. de 2024 ?s 13:39, Andreas Schwibbe <a.schwibbe at gmx...

Right now you have 3 "sets" of replica 2 on 2 hosts.In your case you don't need so much space for arbiters (10-15GB with 95 maxpct is enough for each "set") and you need a 3rd system or when the node that holds the data brick + arbiter brick fails (2 node scenario) - that "set" will be unavailable. If you do have a 3rd host, I think the command would be:gluster