search for: arava

I noticed that after the lastest yum update on CentOS 5.6 we get Postfix 2.3.3, but the status of the postfix service (chkconfig --list postfix) changes to off. So after a reboot, it doesn't start automatically. I don't recall this ever happening before. Is this by design? A packaging error? Thanks, Micha

Dear All, Trying to port an application to linux using wine. The program seems to have got struck with some kind of socket issues. Here is the last few lines of the log generated . Anything thats going wrong . ClientPlugHandler.dll, ClientPlug.dll and Dispatcher.dll are dlls within the application folder .I registered these dlls. Any help would be appreciated.

> > What are the Windoze versions of both the DCs and the workstations? - > it''s important. NT4 DCs with any clients have a very different set of > rules for what''s needed for browsing to work properly than > Win2K/2K3 DCs > with Win2K/XP clients.... Hello Greg: One older server is an NT DC, and the two others (including the WINS server with Active Directory,

From the WIki features page, ( http://wiki.dovecot.org/moin.cgi/CoreFeatures ) it's not clear to me if the dovecot-stable release supports multiple authentications mechanisms (like in 1.0-testxx). I need both virtual domains and system users. Can I use the stable release for this? Thanks, --Micha

I'm redesigning our mail server which holds several hundred mailboxes - most are local system users and some are virtual domains that we host. I understand that the 1.0x stable release allows for multiple auth mechinisms, so that I could use both PAM for local users and a passwd-file for the virtuals. If I want to stick with 0.99x can I mix and match in a single passwd-file the

Can''t figure this one out: I''ve been running shorewall 1.4.10 for many months now on a Fedora Core 1 machine. Just finished setting up a new machine (Fedora Core 2) with shorewall 2.0.9. In the new installation, I editted the shorewall config files, copying over my rules, masq entries, policies, etc to each new file. Shorewall startup goes thru fine. Today I switched between

> > The best thing to do is add this to /etc/selinux/config > > SELINUX=disabled > > And then get on with the real jobs.... > Listening to all the pros and cons of SELinux. I'd like to improve the security of our regional web server using SELinux. We have a main regional web site and several virtual domains, kept up by private users, all on the same server. Some of

Today I updated several servers running CentOS 4.3, and got the new 2.6.9-42 kernel. One of the machines serves as our firewall. After rebooting I lost all forwarding thru the machine. I reverted back to the 2.6.9-34 kernel and connectivity returned. During the few minutes that the new kernel was running I checked that the routing table looked OK, and with tcpdump I saw that indeed no traffic