search for: aranger

Hello I've been looking at a debuginfo issue on an out-of-tree target which uses DWARF aranges. The problem is that aranges are generated for both data and code objects, and the debugger gets confused when program addresses overlap data addresses. The target is a Harvard Architecture CPU, so the appearance of overlapping address ranges is not in itself a bug as they reside in different

Hi, In the code below I create a small data.frame (dat) and then cut it into different groups using CutList. The lists in CutList allow to me choose whatever columns I want from dat and allow me to cut it into any number of groups by changing the lists. It seems to work OK but when I'm done I have a variable number of data frames what I need to do further operations on and I don't know

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 10:50 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > SCE tuning does turn on the .debug_aranges section. Our debugger team > really cares about startup cost. Turnaround time in general is huge for our > licensees, to the point where we support edit-and-continue (minimal > rebuild, live-patch the running process). > Ah, good to know! I'd

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 9:31 AM Robinson, Paul <paul.robinson at sony.com> wrote: > With AVR being affected, upstreaming a patch to put segment selectors into > .debug_aranges becomes completely reasonable. There would likely want to > be a target hook somewhere to return a value saying what size to use, with > the default implementation returning zero. > *nod* something

Hi, I just updated from r190763 to r191137 and started getting failures in generated assembly language when debug info is enabled. Here is the test case: // Compile and run for every target. // RUN: %ecc -g -o %t %s && %t // FAIL: %armecc -g -o %t %s && %armrun %t // FAIL: %armebecc -g -o %t %s && %armebrun %t // RUN: %i386ecc -g -o %t %s && %i386run %t // FAIL:

On Thu Mar 12, 2020 at 5:37 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 8:09 AM Luke Drummond > <luke.drummond at codeplay.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue Mar 10, 2020 at 7:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > > > If you only want code addresses, why not use the CU's > > > low_pc/high_pc/ranges > > > - those are guaranteed to be only code

I'm not across most of this debug info stuff but I'll stomp in here to confirm that AVR is a Harvard architecture, with separate addressing for the data and program buses via specialized instructions which will load from either one, or the other, but never both. It makes sense that this particular problem would also affect AVR - the backend does have some issues with debug info

I’ve encountered this kind of architecture before, a long time ago (academically). In a flat-address-space machine such as X64, there is still an instruction/data distinction, but usually only down at the level of I-cache versus D-cache (instruction fetch versus data fetch). A Harvard architecture machine exposes that to the programmer, which effectively doubles the available address space.

Interesting. File please? Thanks. On Sep 21, 2013 6:01 AM, "Richard Pennington" <rich at pennware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I just updated from r190763 to r191137 and started getting failures in > generated assembly language when debug info is enabled. Here is the test > case: > > // Compile and run for every target. > // RUN: %ecc -g -o %t %s && %t

Hi, I'm new to R and I'm finding it quite a chore trawling through the R documentation to find a function to carry out simple atomic tasks. Is any one aware of R help documentation that is aranged in functional categories for e.g.: String manipulation File I/O Dataframe, List manipulation etc, etc ... Thanks _________________________________________________________________ Get

If it thinks the symbol is in the BSS section, then it should never have tried to use .comm to emit it I think. On x86 it does not try to mix and match, which is why it works. AFAIK comm symbols are regarded as having no section, rather than being bss, so I think it's a bug in whatever code printed that .comm statement. I'll look into this tomorrow. > Eric Christopher

On Tue Mar 10, 2020 at 7:45 PM, David Blaikie wrote: > If you only want code addresses, why not use the CU's > low_pc/high_pc/ranges > - those are guaranteed to be only code addresses, I think? > In the common case, for most targets LLVM supports I think you're right, but for my case, regrettably, not. Because my target is a Harvard Architecture, any code address can have the

There is a very nice Search Engine, with Keywords arranged by topic, that comes with R. If you are under Windows (and have Html help installed), you can find this in the Help menu, under "Html help". (The relevant file can also be found as ...\doc\html\search\SearchEngine.html.) Maybe this helps, Heinrich. > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Neil Osborne

Hello I have a Junghanns ISDN BRI card for incoming calls and use SIP Polycom IP300 phones. My config files look like this: features.conf pickupextn = *8 zapata.conf context=frompstnisdn group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 I also edited sip.conf like this: group=1 callgroup=1 pickupgroup=1 But on internal and incoming calls if I dial *8 from any phone I cannot pickup. Do I need to add

Hello all, Name is Andrew and in desperate need of some info. Setup: - Mandrake 9.1 with three interfaces (eth0 --> WAN) C-class /28 network (with tree virtual addresses which I am DNAT-ing to the DMZ) (eth1 --> LAN) A-class 10.0.0.0/8 (eth2 --> DMZ) A-class subnet 10.1.123.0/24 - Running stock Shorewall ver: shorewall-1.3.14-3.1.91mdk Dilemma: - LAN can not access the DMZ zone

Estimado Jesús Para Fernández En teoría es ese material, lo vi muy rápido y en la parte genética tiene cosas que biológicamente no son así, hay un libro de Falconer, Introducción a la genética cuantitativa, que tiene escrita la parte matemática, hay un abismo entre la biología y los ingenieros que se inspiran en la biología. Yo pensaba en la resolución de un problema real, aunque relativamente

Another example would be .debug_pubnames and .debug_pubtypes sections. Currently these default to omitted for Darwin and PS4, but included everywhere else. My initial patch for "tuning" changes the PS4 platform criterion to the SCE debugger predicate; quite likely the "not Darwin" criterion ought to be "not LLDB" or in other words "on for GDB only."

...port to the Perl module Ogg::Vorbis::Header::PurePerl (because of the simplicity of cross platform use). Seeing as this list would have the most knowledge about the proper methods regarding this task, I'm submitting this for anyone to look at before it (possibly) hits CPAN. http://alus.mine.nu/aRanger/PurePerl.pm Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscr...

Dear R-users, Does anybody know a good way to create and use several graphical devices at the same time in interactive mode? Ideally, I'd like to open 2 to 3 devices and assign names to them. This way, I could make any addition/modification/update to a particular device using its name. I did not see anything like a name argument in ?X11. Is there an alternative? Thanks in advance for your

Comments on the patch raise the following questions, probably better discussed here. First: Should LLVM default to "no tuning" rather than a target-specific default? There are two natural follow-up questions: What would "no tuning" actually mean? Where would the target-specific defaulting occur? I originally came down against the "no tuning" option, in favor of the