search for: ar_rnat

...ipsr: 00001012087a6010 b0: a000000100068a70 b6: a00000010014ff60 b7: e000000000000800 cr_ifs: 800000000000050a ar_unat: 0000000000000000 ar_pfs: 8000000000000209 ar_rsc: 0000000000000008 ar_rnat: 0000000000000000 ar_bspstore: a000000100c19030 ar_fpsr: 0009804c8a70433f event_callback_ip: a000000100067a20 pr: 000000000005aa85 loadrs: 0000000000780000 iva: a000000100008000 dcr: 0000000000007e04 r1: a...

...ULT /* L-unit */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r25,16 /* save ar.unat */ >+ st8 [r17]=r26,16 /* save ar.pfs */ >+ shl r18=r18,16 /* compute ar.rsc to be used for >"loadrs" */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r27,16 /* save ar.rsc */ >+ adds r17=16,r17 /* skip over ar_rnat field */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r17]=r31,16 /* save predicates */ >+ adds r16=16,r16 /* skip over ar_bspstore field */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r29,16 /* save b0 */ >+ st8 [r17]=r18,16 /* save ar.rsc value for "loadrs" */ >+ ;; >+.mem.offset 0,0; st8.spil...

...ULT /* L-unit */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r25,16 /* save ar.unat */ >+ st8 [r17]=r26,16 /* save ar.pfs */ >+ shl r18=r18,16 /* compute ar.rsc to be used for >"loadrs" */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r27,16 /* save ar.rsc */ >+ adds r17=16,r17 /* skip over ar_rnat field */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r17]=r31,16 /* save predicates */ >+ adds r16=16,r16 /* skip over ar_bspstore field */ >+ ;; >+ st8 [r16]=r29,16 /* save b0 */ >+ st8 [r17]=r18,16 /* save ar.rsc value for "loadrs" */ >+ ;; >+.mem.offset 0,0; st8.spil...

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. The patch I send before was too large so that it was dropped from the maling list. I'm sending again with smaller size. This patch set is the xen paravirtualization of hand written assenbly code. And I expect that much clean up is necessary before merge. We really need the feed back before starting actual clean up as Eddie already said before. Eddie discussed how to clean up and suggested

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. I rewrote the patch according to the comments. I adopted generating in-place code because it looks the quickest way. The point Eddie wanted to discuss is how to generate code and its ABI. i.e. in-place generating v.s. direct jump v.s. indirect function call Indirect function call doesn't make sense because ivt.S is compiled multi times. And it is up to pv instances to choose in-place

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements xen/ia64 domU support. Qing He and Eddie Dong also has been woring on pv_ops so that I want to discuss before going further and avoid duplicated work. I suppose that Eddie will also post his own patch. So reviewing both patches, we can reach to better pv_ops interface. - I didn't changed the ia64 intrinsic paravirtulization abi from the last post. Presumably it

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Now all the comments so far have been addressed, but only a few exceptions. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops.

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Please review and comments. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops strategy is appropriate too. Later I'll post the patchset which implements xen domU based on ia64/pv_ops. Currently only ia64/xen pv_ops implementation

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/pv_ops support which is the framework for virtualization support. Changes from take 5 are rebased to Linux 2.6.26-rc3, bug fix ivt.S paravirtualization and multi entry point support. I believe these patches can be applied to the linux ia64 repository. On x86 various ways to support virtualization were proposed, and eventually pv_ops won. So on ia64 the pv_ops

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with Xen hypervisor. - Add some helper functions which is necessary to

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with Xen hypervisor. - Add some helper functions which is necessary to

Hi. This patchset implements ia64/xen domU support based on ia64/pv_ops frame work which was sent as another patchest. Please review and comments. This patchset does the followings. - Some preparation work. Mainly importing header files to define related structures. - Then, define functions related to hypercall which is the way to communicate with Xen hypervisor. - Add some helper functions