search for: ar1_nn_audio

...code compiled from src, +16000 option. ( same phenomenon seen with +16000 +wb option) 5ms 10ms 20ms 40ms ar1_NN_voip 4.314 4.493 4.488 4.488 ar2_NN_voip 4.346 4.442 4.436 4.474 ar3_NN_voip 3.993 4.375 4.414 4.390 ar1_NN_audio 4.292 4.485 -> 4.313 4.313 ar2_NN_audio 4.364 4.460 -> 4.350 4.350 ar3_NN_audio 3.924 4.327 -> 4.218 4.218 Note that this size/type of pesq test is insufficient to draw ANY conclusions. However, it is useful for drawing attention to relative difference...

Hi Kevin, Are you saying that the quality is good at 20 ms and bad at 10 ms, or the reverse? Also, is this speech or music? What tool, what options? In general, it helps a lot if you post the sample (input and output). Cheers, Jean-Marc On 06/03/2016 12:48 PM, Kevin Connor wrote: > Hi Opus list, > > I'm noticing a discontinuity in the quality between use of 10ms and > 20ms